Abstract
Data are presented from two magnitude estimation experiments in which the geographical areas of Brazilian states were judged. In Experiment 1 observers estimated the areas of the states in three conditions: in the presence of a map (perceived area), using memory following study of a map (remembered area), and using only general knowledge of Brazilian geography (inferred area). The results showed that the psychophysical power law describes well the inferred, remembered, and perceived magnitude estimates of areas of states. As had been found previously for areas of states, the remembered exponent approximated the square of the perceived exponent. Experiment 2 examined the correlations of the power functions exponents for observers who estimated areas of states on two sessions separated by an interval of 1 month. As in Experiment 1, observers estimated the areas from inference, from memory following study of a map, or in the presence of a map. Again, comparison of remembered and perceived psychophysical functions showed that for both sessions the remembered exponent was equal to the square of the perceived exponent. Since the correlations between Sessions 1 and 2 were fairly high and positive, the results also showed that all modes of judgments manifest temporal stability for an interval of at least 1 month between sessions. Stable individual differences can be shown for the exponent of the psychophysical power function for magnitude estimates of inferred, remembered, and perceived area. Although the exponent varies from one individual to another, the power function accurately describes the data of all observers in all conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, J. C. (1970). Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon Press.
Baird, J. C., Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 277–289.
Borg, G. (1986). Interindividual and intermodal comparison of perceptual intensities. In B. Berglund, U. Berglund, & R. Teghtsoonian (Eds.), Fechner Day86(pp. 123-128). Stockholm, Sweden: International Society for Psychophysics.
Da Silva, J. A., Dos Santos, R. A., & Da Silva, C. B. (1983). Análíse psicofisca do espaço visual- teoria e pesquisa: Tributo a S. S. Stevens. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 35, 3–53.
Da Silva, J. A., & Fukusima, S. S. (1986). Stability of individual psychophysical functions for perceived distance in natural indoor and outdoor settings. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 63, 891–902.
Da Silva, J. A., & Macedo, L. (1983). Efeitos de algumas variáveis experimentais sobre a invariância das escalas perceptivas. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 39, 48–70.
Kerst, S. M., & Howard, J. H., Jr. (1978). Memory psychophysics for visual area and length. Memory & Cognition, 6, 327–335.
Kerst, S. M., & Howard, J. H., Jr. (1984). Magnitude estimates of perceived and remembered length and area. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 517–520.
Lundberg, V., & Ekman, G. (1972). Geographical data as psychophysical stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 81–88.
Moyer, R. S., Bradley, D. R., Sorensen, M. H., Whiting, J. C, & Mansfield, D. P. (1978). Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered size. Science, 200, 330–332.
Moyer, R. S., Sklarew, P., & Whiting, J. (1982). Memory psychophysics. In H. G. Gussler & P. Petzold (Eds.), Psychophysical judgment and the process of perception (pp. 35-46). Berlin, West Germany: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Mulholland, T. M., Da Silva, J. A., Janczura, G. A., & Penso, M. A. (1981, October). Estimação de razão de distância em escala geográfica. Paper presented at the XIV Rãeunio Anual da Sociedade de Psicologia de Ribeirão Prêto, Ribeirão Prêto.
Osaka, N. (1983). Memory psychophysics for perceived length and area: A psychophysical approach to memory processes. Faculty of Letter Review, 17, 15–28.
Teghtsoonian, M. (1965). The judgment of size. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 392–402.
Teghtsoonian, M., & Teghtsoonian, R. (1971). How repeatable are Stevens’ power law exponents for individual subjects? Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 147–149.
Teghtsoonian, M., & Teghtsoonian, R. (1983). Consistency of individual exponents in cross-modal matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 203–214.
Teghtsoonian, R., & Teghtsoonian, M.(1986). Individual differences in the judgment of perceived magnitude. In B. Berglund, U. Berglund, & R. Teghtsoonian (Eds.), Fechner Day 86 (pp. 129-134). Stockholm, Sweden: International Society for Psychophysics.
Verrillo, R. T. (1983). Stability of line-length estimates using the method of absolute magnitude estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 261–266.
Wiest, W. M., & Bell, B. (1985). Stevens’ exponent for psychophysical scaling of perceived, remembered, and inferred distance. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 457–470.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants 85/2135-9, 85/2199-7, and 85/1625-2 from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estadode Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil. The preparation of the manuscript was supported by Grant 30.0567-85 from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifco e Tecnológico(CNPq). We thank Jack M. Loomis for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Da Silva, J.A., Marques, S.L. & Ruiz, E.M. Subject differences in exponents of psychophysical power functions for inferred, remembered, and perceived area. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 25, 191–194 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330325
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330325