Abstract
Two experiments investigated the ability of subjects to identify a moving, tactile stimulus. In both experiments, the subjects were presented with a target to their left index fingerpad and a nontarget (also moving) to their left middle fingerpad. Subjects were instructed to attend only to the target location and to respond “1” if the stimulus moved either to the left or up the finger, and to respond “2” if the stimulus moved either right or down the finger. The results showed that accuracy was better and reaction times were faster when the target and nontarget moved in the same direction than when they moved in different directions. When the target and nontarget moved in different directions, accuracy was significantly better and reaction times were significantly faster when the two stimuli had the same assigned response than when they had different responses. The results provide support for the conclusion that movement information is processed across adjacent fingers to the level of incipient response activation, even when subjects attempt to focus their attention on one location on the skin.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertelson, P. (1967). The time course of preparation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,19, 272–279.
Bjork, E. L., &Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing.Psychological Review,84, 472–484.
Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information.Acta Psychologica,50, 253–290.
Cholewiak, R. W., &Craig, J. C. (1984). Vibrotactile pattern recognition and discrimination at several body sites.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 503–514.
Craig, J. C. (1974). Vibrotactile difference thresholds for intensity and the effect of a masking stimulus.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 123–127.
Craig, J. C. (1980). Modes of vibrotactile pattern generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 151–166.
Craig, J. C. (1982). Vibrotactile masking: A comparison of energy and pattern maskers.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 523–529.
Craig, J. C., &Evans, P. M. (1987). Vibrotactile masking and the persistence of tactual features.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 309–317.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1991). Target-distractor separation and feature integration in visual attention to letters.Acta Psychologica,76, 101–119.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W., (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 278–286.
Estes, W. K. (1974). Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letters.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 53–60.
Evans, P. M., &Craig, J. C. (1991). Tactile attention and the perception of moving tactile stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 355–364.
Gathercole, S. E., &Broadbent, D. E. (1987). Spatial factors in visual attention: Some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.Perception,16, 433–443.
Gescheider, G. A., Herman, D. D., &Phillips, J. N. (1970). Criterion shifts in the measurement of tactile masking.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 433–436,
Gilson, R. D. (1969). Vibrotactile masking: Some spatial and temporal aspects.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 176–180.
Johnston, W. A., &Dark, V. J. (1982). In defense of intraperceptual theories of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 407–421.
Keren, G., O’Hara, W. P., &Skelton, J. M. (1977). Level of noise processing and attentional control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 653–664.
Miller, J. (1982). Effects of noise letters on decisions: Discrete or continuous flow of information?Perception & Psychophysics,31, 227–236.
Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 419–434.
Neill, W. T. (1978). Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 80–84.
Posner, M. I., &Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention.Psychological Review,78, 391–408.
Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 413–419.
Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena.Psychological Review,88, 291–326.
Rueckl, J. G., Suzuki, S., &Yeh, S. (1991). On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 412–421.
Sherrick, C. E. (1964). Effects of double simultaneous stimulation of the skin.American Journal of Psychology,77, 42–53.
Sherrick, C. E., &Cholewiak, R. W. (1986). Cutaneous sensitivity. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 12-1–12-58). New York: Wiley.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Geisler, W. A. (1973). Visual recognition in a theory of information processing. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 53–101). Washington, DC: Winston.
Snyder, R. E. (1977). Vibrotactile masking: A comparison of psychophysical procedures.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 471–475.
St.James, J. D. (1991). Observations on the microstructure of response conflict.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 517–524.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Treisman, A. M. (1964). Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,3, 449–459.
Van Der Heuden, A. H. C. (1981).Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Weisenberger, J. M. (1981).Tactile pattern similarity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant DC-00095 from the National Institutes of Health and was conducted while the first author was a visiting scholar in the Institute for the Study of Human Capabilities at Indiana University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, P.M., Craig, J.C. Response competition: A major source of interference in a tactile identification task. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 199–206 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212244
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212244