Abstract
Physical constraints produce variations in the shapes of biological objects that correspond to their sizes. Bingham (in press-b) showed that two properties of tree form could be used to evaluate the height of trees. Observers judged simulated tree silhouettes of constant image size appearing on a ground texture gradient with a horizon. According to the horizon ratio hypothesis, the horizon can be used to judge object size because it intersects the image of an object at eye height. The present study was an investigation of whether the locus of the horizon might account for Bingham’s previous results. Tree images were projected to a simulated eye height that was twice that used previously. Judgments were not halved, as predicted by the horizon ratio hypothesis. Next,the original results were replicated in viewing conditions that encouraged the use ofthe horizon ratio by including correct eye height, gaze level, and visual angles. The heights of cylinders were inaccurately judged when they appeared with horizon but without trees. Judgments were much more accurate when the cylinders also appeared in the context of trees.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bingham, G. P. (in press-a). Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.),Mind asmotion: Dynamics, behavior and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bingham, G. P. (in press-b). Perceiving the size of trees: Form as information about scale.Journal of Erperimenral Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Borchert, R.,.&Honda, H. (1984). Control of development in the bifurcating branch system of tabebuia rosea: A computer simulation.Botanical Gazette,145, 184–195.
Boring, E. G. (1940). Size-constancy and Emmert’s law.American Journal of Psychology,53, 293–294.
Calder, W. A. (1984).Size, function, and life history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1950).The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gogel, W. C. (1977). The metric of visual space. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visualperception (pp. 129–181). New York: Wiley.
Hildebrand, M., Bramble, D. M., Liem, K. F., &Wake, D. B. (1985).Functional vertebrate morphology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kilpatrick, F. P., &Ittelson, W. H. (1953). The size-distance invariance hypothesis.Psychological Review,60, 223–231.
Kira, T. (1978). Community architecture and organic matter dynamics in tropical lowland rain forests of Southeast Asia with special reference to Pasoh Forest, West Malaysia. In P. B. Tomlinson & M. H. Zimmermann (Eds.),Tropical trees as living systems (pp. 561–590). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow.Vision Research,26, 161–180.
Mark, L. S. (1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing.Journal of E.xperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 683–703.
Mark, L. S., Balliett, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., &Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting.Ecological Psychology,2, 325–366.
Matin, L., &Fox, C. R. (1989), Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.Vision Research,29, 315–324.
McMahon, T. A. (1975). The mechanical design of trees.Scientific American,223, 97–102.
McMahon, T. A. (1984).Muscles, reflexes, and locomotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McMahon, T. A., &Bonner, J. T. (1983).On size and life. New York: Scientific American Books.
McMahon, T. A., &Kronauer, R. E. (1976). Tree structures: Deducing the principle of mechanical design.Journal of Theoretical Biology,59, 443–466.
Nakayama, K., &Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis.Perception,3, 63–80.
Niklas, K. J. (1992).Plant biomechanics: An engineering approach to plant form and function. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norberg, R. A. (1988). Theory of growth geometry of plants and selfthinning of plant populations: Geometric similarity, elastic similarity and different growth modes of plant parts.The American Naturalist,131, 220–256.
Peters, R. H. (1983).The ecological implications ofbody size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, S., &Costall, A. (1983). On the horizon ratio: Picture perception and Gibson’s concept of information.Leonardo,16, 180–182.
Runeson, S. (1988). The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 295–304.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984).Scaling: Why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sedgwick, H. (1980). The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation. In M. A. Hagen (Ed.),The perception ofpictures (Vol. I. pp. 33–90). New York: Academic Press.
Stoper, A. E., & Bautista, A. (1992. May).Apparent height as a function of pitched environment and task. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, FL.
Stoper, A. E., &Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 469–475.
Stoper, A. E., &Cohen.M. M. (1991). Optical, gravitational and kinesthetic determinants ofjudged eye level. In S. Ellis, M. Kaiser, & A. Grunwald (Eds.),Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Szücs, E. (1980).Similitude and modelling. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Thompson, D. A. (1961).On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turrell, F. M. (1961). Growth of the photosynthetic area of citrus.Botanical Gazette,122, 284–298.
Wainwright, S. A., Brigs, W. D., Currsy, J. D., &Gosline, J. M. (1976).Mechanical design in organisms. New York: Wiley.
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance in stair climbing.Journal of Experienental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 683–703.
Warren, W. H., &Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 371–383.
White, J. (1981). The allometric interpretation ofthe self-thinning rule.Journal of Theoretical Biology,89, 475–500.
Zimmermann, M. H. (1978a). Hydraulic architecture ofsome diffuseporous trees.Canadian Journal of Botany,56, 2286–2295.
Zimmermann, M. H. (1978b). Structural requirements for optimal water conduction in tree stems. In P. B. Tomlinson & M. H. Zimmermann (Eds.),Tropical trees as living systems (pp. 517–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS-9020590 and by the Institute for the Study of Human Capabilities at Indiana University. Michael Stassen programmed the simulations, consulted on the models and mathematics, and guided observers about in the winter cold. Send
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bingham, G.P. Perceiving the size of trees: Biological form and the horizon ratio. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 485–495 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211771
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211771