Abstract
Both semantic and syntactic context constraints can influence word processing at the level of lexical integration. In event-related brain potentials (ERPs), semantic integration is reflected by a negativity around 400 msec (N400), whereas phrase structure assignment and syntactic integration are assumed to be reflected by an early left anterior negativity and a late positivity (P600), respectively. An ERP study is presented in which participants read different types of sentences whose terminal verb was either congruent with the preceding context or incongruent due to a phrase structure violation, a semantic violation, or both. The main finding was that only the pure semantic violation condition, but not the combined semantic and syntactic violation condition, elicited a large N400. The two conditions containing phrase structure violations were predominantly characterized by a P600. Both semantic violation conditions, moreover, displayed a late negativity around 700 msec that overlapped with the P600 in the double violation condition. The absence of an N400 effect for elements that are syntactically as well as semantically incongruent with prior context suggests an early influence of phrase structure information on processes of lexical-semantic integration. The present data are discussed in comparison to previous ERP findings, and a new view of lexical integration processes is proposed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., &Boland, J. E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 112–130.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.
Becker, C. A. (1985). What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading? In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & E. M. McKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 125–169). Toronto: Academic Press.
Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials associated with semantic priming.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,60, 343–355.
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., &Carlson, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 774–806.
Brown, C. M., &Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 34–44.
Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: SSN.
Chwilla, D. J., Brown, C. M., &Hagoort, P. (1995). The N400 as a function of the level of processing.Psychophysiology,32, 274–285.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
Coulson, S., King, J., &Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations.Language & Cognitive Processes,13, 21–58.
Cowart, W. (1982). Autonomy and interaction in the language processing system: A reply to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler.Cognition,12, 109–117.
Deutsch, A., &Bentin, S. (1994). Attention mechanisms mediate the syntactic priming effect in auditory word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 595–607.
Elman, J. L., &McClelland, J. L. (1984). Speech as a cognitive process: The interactive activation model. In N. Lass (Ed.),Speech and language (Vol. 10, pp. 337–374). New York: Academic Press.
Foss, D. J., &Speer, S. R. (1991). Global and local context effects in sentence processing. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 115–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frauenfelder, U. H., &Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction.Cognition,25, 1–20.
Frazier, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition.Cognition,25, 157–187.
Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210.
Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics.Cognition,19, 133–166.
Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.Brain & Language,50, 259–281.
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., &Mecklinger, A. (1996). The temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late ERP effects elicited by syntactic anomalies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1–31.
Friederici, A. D., &Kilborn, K. (1989). Temporal constraints on language processing: Syntactic priming in Broca’s aphasia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 262–272.
Friederici, A. D., &Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,25, 157–176.
Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., &Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations.Cognitive Brain Research,1, 183–192.
Friederici, A. D., &Saddy, D. (1993). Disorders of word class processing in aphasia. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, & C. W. Wallesch (Eds.),Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 169–181). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Frisch, S., & Friederici, A. D. (1998).Verb-argument structure processing: The influence of verb-specific and argument-specific constraints. Poster presented at the Eleventh Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, NJ.
Gorrell, P. (1995).Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., &Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics.Psychophysiology,34, 660–676.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., &Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 439–483.
Hahne, A., &Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 193–204.
Halgren, E., &Smith, M. E. (1987). Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processes in human memory formation and retrieval.Human Neurobiology,6, 129–139.
Holcomb, P. J., &Neville, H. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,5, 281–312.
Hopf, J. M., Bayer, J., Bader, M., &Meng, M. (1998). Eventrelated brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 264–280.
Huynh, H., &Feldt, L. A. (1970). Conditions under which square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions.Journal of the American Statistical Association,65, 1582–1589.
Kutas, M. (1997). Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures.Psychophysiology,34, 383–398.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, St. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science,207, 203–205.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, St. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.Nature,307, 161–163.
Kutas, M., Lindamood, T. E., &Hillyard, St.A. (1984). Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.),Preparatory states and processes (pp. 217–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. (1988). Event-related potential studies of language. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 139–187). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process (Vol. 1, pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., &Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.Cognition,8, 1–71.
McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of eventrelated potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 203–208.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
McKinnon, R., &Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 495–523.
Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., &Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials.Memory & Cognition,23, 477–494.
Meyer, D. M., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234.
Mitchell, D. C. (1989). Verb-guidance and other lexical effects in parsing.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, 123–154.
Münte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., &Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 335–344.
Münte, T. F., Matzke, M., &Johannes, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 318–329.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neely, J. H., &Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press.
Neville, H.-J., Mills, D. L., &Lawson, D. L. (1992). Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods.Cerebral Cortex,2, 244–258.
Neville, H.-J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., &Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 155–170.
Nobre, A. C., &McCarthy, G. (1994). Language-related ERPs: Scalp distributions and modulations by word type and semantic priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,6, 233–255.
Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition.Cognition,22, 93–136.
O’Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., &Aronoff, M. (1989).Contemporary linguistics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.
O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1989). The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 73–87.
O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1997). Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 807–828.
Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 785–804.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., &Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 786–803.
Osterhout, L., &Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 739–773.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review,95, 385–408.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., &Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 358–374.
Rayner, K., &Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 657–673.
Rösler, F., Friederici, A. D., Pütz, P., &Hahne, A. (1993). Eventrelated brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 345–362.
Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words.Memory & Cognition,18, 367–379.
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., &Rose, U. (1998). Context effects in visual word recognition: Lexical relatedness and syntactic context.Memory & Cognition,26, 1292–1303.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 1–36.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do listeners compute linguistic representations? In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural language parsing: Psychological, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 359–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., &Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, 211–234.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Kello, C. (1993). Verbspecific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 528–553.
Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 485–531.
Van Petten, C., &Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.Memory & Cognition,18, 380–393.
Van Petten, C., &Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open-closed-class words.Memory & Cognition,19, 95–112.
West, R. F., &Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing.Memory & Cognition,14, 104–112.
Wright, B., &Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure.Memory & Cognition,12, 31–45.
Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.Cognition,32, 25–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work reported was supported by the Leibniz Science Prize, awarded to A.D.F., and by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG FR 519/12-2).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friederici, A.D., Steinhauer, K. & Frisch, S. Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory & Cognition 27, 438–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211539
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211539