Abstract
Threshold elevations (TE) were determined for three Os at a test site on the left thigh with a masker placed singly at each of 10 widespread loei on the trunk. Although lateral changes in masker placement did not produce a significant alteration in TE (p> .10), there was a systematic decrease in TE with longitudinal separation between masker and test sites on the body. Appropriate manipulations of the time interval between masker and test signals were found effective in offsetting these decreases. It appeared that longitudinal separations were differentially affecting temporal delays by producing unequal neural distances from the test and masker sites to the CNS. There were, however, some spatial changes that could not be accounted for by temporal offsets. Thresholds at a finger test site were significantly less elevated (p< .01) by contralateral placement of maskers than by ipsilateral placement, and the particular test site chosen for threshold determinations, either index finger or thigh, determined the amount of TE.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALLUISI, E. A., MORGAN, B., & HAWKES, G. Masking of cutaneous sensations in multiple stimulus presentations.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 3945.
BEKESY, G. V. Human skin perception of traveling waves similar to those on the cochlea.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 155–161.
BENDER, M. B.Disorders in perception. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1952.
CRAIG, J. C. Vibrotactile loudness addition.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 185–190.
GELDARD, F. A. Cutaneous coding of optical signals: The optohapt.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 377–381.
GELDARD, F. A., & SHERRICK, C. E. Multiple cutaneous stimulation: The discrimination of vibratory patterns.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 37, 797–801.
GILSON, R. D. Some factors affecting the spatial discrimination of vibrotactile patterns.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 131–136.
GOLLA, F., & ANTONOVITCH, S. The rate of conduction in the human motor nerve.Brain, 1931, 54, 492–507.
HALLIDAY, A. M., & MINGAY, R. Retroactive raising of a sensory threshold by a contralateral stimulus.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 13, 1–11.
MAYER, R. F. Nerve conduction studies in man.Neurology, 1963, 13, 1021–1030.
ROSNER, B. S. Neural factors limiting cutaneous spatiotemporal discriminations. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.),Sensory communication. New York: Wiley, 1961.
SCHMID, E. Temporal aspects of cutaneous interaction with two-point electrical stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 61, 400–409.
SHERRICK, C. E. Observations relating to some common psychophysical functions as applied to the skin. In G. R. Hawkes (Ed.),Symposium on cutaneous sensitivity. U. S. Army Medical Research Laboratory, Ft. Knox, Ky., 1960.
SHERRICK, C. E. Effects of double simultaneous stimulation of the skin.American Journal of Psychology, 1964, 77, 42–53.
SHERRICK, C. E. Simple electromechanical vibration transducer.Review ofScientific Instruments, 1965, 36, 1893–1894.
UTTAL, W. R. Inhibitory interaction of responses to electrical stimuli in the fingers.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 1960, 53, 47–51.
YAI, H. The effects of side-pressure on pressure sensation.Japanese Journal of Psychology, 1959, 29, 303–312.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant NB-04755 from the National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilson, R.D. Vibrotactile masking: Some spatial and temporal aspects. Perception & Psychophysics 5, 176–180 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209553
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209553