Abstract
No catalog of words currently available contains normative data for large numbers of words rated low or high in affect. A preliminary sample of 1,545 words was rated for pleasantness by 26–33 college students. Of these words, 274 were selected on the basis of their high or low ratings. These words, along with 125 others (Rubin, 1981), were then rated by additional groups of 62–76 college students on 5-point rating scales for the dimensions of pleasantness, imagery, and familiarity. The resulting mean ratings were highly correlated with the ratings obtained by other investigators using some of the same words. However, systematic differences in the ratings were found for male versus female raters. Females tended to use more extreme ratings than did males when rating words on the pleasantness scale. Also, females tended to rate words higher on the imagery and familiarity scales. Whether these sex differences in ratings represent cognitive differences between the sexes or merely differences in response style is a question that can be determined only by further research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,9, 272–279.
Anisfeld, M., &Lambert, W. E. (1966). When are pleasant words learned faster than unpleasant words?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 132–141.
Banaji, M. R.,Bellezza, F S., &Greenwald, A. G. (1985, May).Are women more emotional? Gender differences in reported emotional response do not translate to recall. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Bousfield, W. A. (1950). The relationship between mood and the production of affectively toned associations.Journal of General Psychology,42, 67–85.
Broadbent, D. E., &Gregory, M H. P. (1967). The perception of emotionally toned words.Nature,215, 581–584.
Brown, A. S. (1976). Catalog of scaled verbal material.Memory & Cognition,4(1B), 1S-45S.
Brown, W. P., &Ure, D. M. J. (1969). Five rated characteristics of 650 word association stimuli.British Journal of Psychology,60, 233–249.
Cason, H., &Lungren, F C. (1932). Memory for pleasant, unpleasant, and indifferent words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 728–732.
Isen, A. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kanungo, R. N., &Dutta, S. (1966). Retention of affective material: Frame of reference or intensity?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,4, 27–35.
Ledgerwood, R. (1932). A comparison of methods in determining the affective value of words.American Journal of Psychology,44, 796–797.
Levinger, G., &Clark, J. (1961). Emotional factors in the forgetting of word associations.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,62, 99–105.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt.
Paivio, A.,Yuille, J. C, &Madigan, S A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76(1, Pt. 2).
Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of behavior.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 736–755.
Rubin, D. C. (1981). Norms for 34 properties of 125 words.JASA Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,11, 19. (Ms. No. 2213)
Silverstein, A., &Dienstbier, R. A. (1968). Rated pleasantness and association value of 101 English nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 81–86.
Teasdale, J. D., &Russell, M. L. (1983). Differential aspects of induced mood on the recall of positive, negative, and neutral words.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,22, 163–171.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
White, M. M. (1936). Some factors influencing the recall of pleasant and unpleasant words.American Journal of Psychology,48, 134–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant to the first author from the Field-Wiltsie foundation. The authors would like to thank Ronald Sokol for his help in collecting and scoring the data. Thanks also go to Ohio University Computing and Learning Services for making computer time and their facilities available.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bellezza, F.S., Greenwald, A.G. & Banaji, M.R. Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 18, 299–303 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204403
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204403