Abstract
Visual cuing studies have been widely used to demonstrate and explore contributions from both object- and location-based attention systems. A common finding has been a response advantage for shifts of attention occurring within an object, relative to shifts of an equal distance between objects. The present study examined this advantage for within-object shifts in terms of engage and disengage operations within the object- and location-based attention systems. The rationale was that shifts of attention between objects require object-based attention to disengage from one object before shifting to another, something that is not required for shifts of attention within an object or away from a location. One- and two-object displays were used to assess object-based contributions related to disengaging and engaging attention within, between, into, and out of objects. The results suggest that the “object advantage” commonly found in visual cuing experiments in which shifts of attention are required is primarily due to disengage operations associated with object-based attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 818–833.
Arrington, C. M., Carr, T. H., Mayer, A. R., &Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object-based selection of a region in space.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12(Suppl. 2), 106–117.
Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1604–1612.
Brown, J. M., Breitmeyer, B. G., Leighty, K. A., &Denney, H. I. (2006). The path of visual attention.Acta Psychologica,121, 199–209.
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., &Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human parietal cortex.Nature Neuroscience,3, 292–297.
Corbetta, M., &Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,3, 201–215.
Davis, G., Driver, J., Pavani, F., &Shepherd, A. (2000). Reappraising the apparent costs of attending to two separate visual objects.Vision Research,40, 1323–1332.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., &Starrveveld, Y. (1994). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for object-based attention.Psychological Science,5, 380–383.
Goldsmith, M., &Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 897–918.
Lamy, D., &Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 52–66.
Lavie, N., &Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 1238–1251.
Law, M. B., &Abrams, R. A. (2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 1017–1027.
Leek, E. C., Reppa, I., &Tipper, S. P. (2003). Inhibition of return for objects and locations in static displays.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 388–395.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Reppa, I., &Leek, E. C. (2003). The modulation of inhibition of return by object-internal structure: Implications for theories of object-based attentional selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 493–502.
Serences, J. T., Liu, T., &Yantis, S. (2005). Parietal mechanisms of attentional control: Locations, features, and objects. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.),Neurobiology of attention (pp. 35–41). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shomstein, S., &Yantis, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting?Perception & Psychophysics,64, 41–51.
Shomstein, S., &Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 247–253.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Drive, and Rafal (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 316–320.
Vecera, S. P. (2000). Toward a biased competition account of object-based segregation and attention.Brain & Mind,1, 353–384.
Vecera, S. P., &Behrmann, M. (2001). Attention and unit formation: A biased competition account of object-based attention. In T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman (Eds.),From fragments to objects: Segregation and grouping in vision (pp. 145–180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Vecera, S. P., &Flevaris, A. V. (2005). Attention control parameters following parietal-lobe damage: Evidence from normal subjects.Neuropsychologia,43, 1189–1203.
Weisstein, N., &Harris, C. S. (1974). Visual detection of line segments: An object-superiority effect.Science,186, 752–755.
Williams, A., &Weisstein, N. (1978). Line segments are perceived better in a coherent context than alone: An object-line effect in visual perception.Memory & Cognition,6, 85–90.
Yantis, S., Schwarzbach, J., Serences, J. T.,Carlson, R. L., Steinmetz, M. A., Pekar, J. J., &Courtney, S. M. (2002). Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts.Nature Neuroscience,5, 995–1002.
Yantis, S., &Serences, J. T. (2003). Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control.Current Opinion in Neurobiology,13, 187–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, J.M., Denney, H.I. Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 606–618 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193918
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193918