Abstract
This paper describes an intelligent system that performs the JSM automated research support method, which is designed to diagnose pancreatic diseases, that is, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. A preliminary study is presented; further trends for the development of the system are listed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Shesternikova, O.P. and Pankratova, E.S., An intelligent system for detecting patterns in gastroenterological data, Trudy Pyatnadtsatoi natsional’noi konferentsii po iskusstvennomu intellektu s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem KII-2016 (3–7 oktyabrya 2016 g., g. Smolensk, Rossiya) (Proc. Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation KII-2016 (October 3–7, 2016, Smolensk, Russia)), Smolensk, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 396–404.
Finn, V.K. and Shesternikova, O.P., The heuristics of detection of empirical regularities by JSM reasoning, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2018, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 215–247.
DSM-metod avtomaticheskogo porozhdeniya gipotez: Logicheskie i epistemologicheskie osnovaniya, (The JSM Method for Automatic Hypothesis Generation: Logical and Epistemological Foundations), Anshakov, O.M., Ed., Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2009.
Russo, A., Rosell, R., and Rolfo, C., Targeted Therapies for Solid Tumors: A Handbook for Moving Toward New Frontiers in Cancer Treatment, Humana Press, 2015.
Pinho, A.V., Chantrill, L., and Rooman, I., Chronic pancreatitis: A path to pancreatic cancer, Cancer Lett., 2013, vol. 345, no. 2, pp. 203–209.
Finn, V.K., Distributive lattices of inductive JSM procedures, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2014, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 265–295.
Finn, V.K., About heuristics of JSM studies (additions to articles), Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2019.
FUNDING
The study was performed with partial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-29-03063MK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by L. Solovyova
Appendices
APPENDIX 1
The list of features used in the fact base and their data types
No. | Sign name | Data type |
---|---|---|
1. Clinical data | ||
1 | 1.1 Gender | Enumeration |
2 | 1.2 Age | Integer |
3 | 1.3 Body mass index | Number with two decimal digits |
4 | 1.4 Duration of the disease | Number with two decimal digits |
5 | 1.5 Presence of alcohol addiction | Binary type |
6 | 1.6 Availability of tobacco addiction | Binary type |
7 | 1.7 Development of diabetes | Binary type |
8 | 1.8 Pancreatic cancer | Binary type |
2. Laboratory data | ||
2.1 Biochemistry | ||
9 | 2.1.1 Total bilirubin | Number with two decimal digits |
10 | 2.1.2 Direct bilirubin | Number with two decimal digits |
11 | 2.1.3 Indirect bilirubin | Number with two decimal digits |
12 | 2.1.4 Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTP) | Number with two decimal digits |
13 | 2.1.6 Glucose | Number with two decimal digits |
14 | 2.1.5 Total protein | Number with two decimal digits |
15 | 2.1.7 c-peptide | Number with two decimal digits |
16 | 2.1.8 Fecal elastase | Number with two decimal digits |
2.2 General blood test | ||
17 | 2.2.1 Hemoglobin | Number with two decimal digits |
18 | 2.2.2 White blood cells | Number with two decimal digits |
19 | 2.2.3 ESR | Number with two decimal digits |
2.3 Oncomarkers | ||
20 | 2.3.1 CA 19-9 | Number with two decimal digits |
21 | 2.3.2 CA 242 | Number with two decimal digits |
22 | 2.3.3 CEA | Number with two decimal digits |
3. Ultrasound examination | ||
3.1 Reliable signs of pancreatic cancer (PC) | ||
23 | 3.1.1 Identification of a volumetric neoplasm (more often solid), hypo and isoechoic identification | Binary type |
3.2 Indirect signs of PC | ||
24 | 3.2.1 Uniform dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) without pronounced wall compaction | Binary type |
3.3 Direct signs of chronic pancreatitis | ||
25 | 3.3.1 Calcifications | Binary type |
3.4 Signs of chronic pancreatitis | ||
26 | 3.4.1 Hyperechoic structure of the pancreas | Binary type |
27 | 3.4.2 Uneven dilatation of the MPD, compaction of its walls | Binary type |
4. Computed tomography (CT) | ||
28 | 4.1 Neoplasms in the structure of the pancreas | Binary type |
29 | 4.2 Biliary hypertension | Binary type |
4.3 Dilatation of the MPD | ||
30 | 4.3.1 No | Binary type |
31 | 4.3.2 Yes, regular | Binary type |
32 | 4.3.3 Yes, irregular | Binary type |
4.4 Densitometric characteristics for pancreatic cancer in phases, HU | ||
4.4.1 Native | ||
33 | 4.4.1.1 min | Integer |
34 | 4.4.1.1 max | Integer |
4.4.2 Arterial | ||
35 | 4.4.2.1 min | Integer |
36 | 4.4.2.1 max | Integer |
4.4.3 Venous | ||
37 | 4.4.3.1 min | Integer |
38 | 4.4.3.1 max | Integer |
4.4.4 Delayed | ||
39 | 4.4.4.1 min | Integer |
40 | 4.4.4.1 max | Integer |
4.5 Density gradient between tumor and unchanged tissue | ||
4.5.1 Native | ||
41 | 4.5.1.1 min | Integer |
42 | 4.5.1.1 max | Integer |
4.5.2 Arterial | ||
43 | 4.5.2.1 min | Integer |
44 | 4.5.2.1 max | Integer |
4.5.3 Venous | ||
45 | 4.5.3.1 min | Integer |
46 | 4.5.3.1 max | Integer |
4.5.4 Delayed | ||
47 | 4.5.4.1 min | Integer |
48 | 4.5.4.1 max | Integer |
4.6 Gradient average | ||
49 | 4.6.1 Native | Number with two decimal digits |
50 | 4.6.2 Arterial | Number with two decimal digits |
51 | 4.6.3 Venous | Number with two decimal digits |
52 | 4.6.4 Delayed | Number with two decimal digits |
An example of a correct prediction
The source example for prediction:
0—Id | 73 |
1—Gender | M |
2—Age | 72 |
3—BMI | 26.4 |
4—Duration of the disease | 4 |
5—Alcohol | Yes |
6—Smoking | Yes |
7—ID | No |
8—Pancreatic cancer | |
9—Total bilirubin | 12.9 |
10—Direct bilirubin | 2.9 |
11– Indirect bilirubin | 10 |
12– GGTP | 202 |
13—Total protein | 70.7 |
14—Glucose | 5.9 |
15—C-peptide | 0.6 |
16—Fecal elastase | 296 |
17—Hemoglobin | 127 |
18—White blood cells | 6.3 |
19—ESR | 33 |
20—CaA19-9 | 974 |
21—CA 242 | 150 |
22—CEA | 4.5 |
23—Detection of a voluminous neoplasm (more often solid), hypo and isoechoic detection | Yes |
24—(US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of its walls | Yes |
25—(US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of its walls | No |
26—Hyperechoic structure of the pancreas | Yes |
27—(US) Irregular dilatation of the MPD, compaction of its walls | No |
28—Neoplasms in the structure of the pancreas | Yes |
29—Biliary hypertension | Yes |
30—(CT) There is a dilatation of the MPD | No |
31—(CT) Regular dilatation of the MPD | Yes |
32—(CT) Irregular dilatation of the MPD | No |
33—Densitometry (native, min) | 20 |
34—Densitometry (native, max) | 77 |
35—Densitometry (arterial, min) | 16 |
36—Densitometry (arterial, max) | 106 |
37—Densitometry (venous, min) | 24 |
38—Densitometry (venous, max) | 121 |
39—Densitometry (delayed, min) | 37 |
40—Densitometry (delayed, max) | 137 |
41– Gradient (native, min) | 24 |
42—Gradient (native, max) | 8 |
43—Gradient (arterial, min) | 8 |
44—Gradient (arterial, max) | 6 |
45—Gradient (venous, min) | 43 |
46—Gradient (venous, max) | 23 |
47—Gradient (delayed, min) | 22 |
48—Gradient (delayed, max) | 29 |
49—Gradient average (native) | 16 |
50—Gradient average (arterial) | 7 |
51—Gradient average (venous) | 33 |
52—Gradient average (delayed) | 25.5 |
In this example, the system diagnosed PC using the following hypotheses (the signs that have no values in the hypothesis are omitted): | |
Hypothesis 1 | |
22—CEA | 3.1–10.2 |
25—(US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of walls | No |
26—Hyperechoic structure of the gland | Yes |
28—Neoplasms in the structure of the pancreas | Yes |
49—Gradient average (native) | 9–16 |
Hypothesis 2 | |
4—Duration of the disease | 0.45–4 |
14—Glucose | 5.13–6.27 |
23—Detection of a voluminous neoplasm (more often solid), hypo and isoechoic detection | Yes |
25—US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of walls | No |
26—Hyperechoic structure of the gland | Yes |
About this article
Cite this article
Shesternikova, O.P., Finn, V.K., Vinokurova, L.V. et al. An Intelligent System for Diagnostics of Pancreatic Diseases. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 53, 288–294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510551905008X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510551905008X