Skip to main content
Log in

An Intelligent System for Diagnostics of Pancreatic Diseases

  • THE JSM METHOD OF AUTOMATED RESEARCH SUPPORT AND ITS APPLICATION IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICINE
  • Published:
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper describes an intelligent system that performs the JSM automated research support method, which is designed to diagnose pancreatic diseases, that is, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. A preliminary study is presented; further trends for the development of the system are listed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Shesternikova, O.P. and Pankratova, E.S., An intelligent system for detecting patterns in gastroenterological data, Trudy Pyatnadtsatoi natsional’noi konferentsii po iskusstvennomu intellektu s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem KII-2016 (3–7 oktyabrya 2016 g., g. Smolensk, Rossiya) (Proc. Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence with International Participation KII-2016 (October 3–7, 2016, Smolensk, Russia)), Smolensk, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 396–404.

  2. Finn, V.K. and Shesternikova, O.P., The heuristics of detection of empirical regularities by JSM reasoning, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2018, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DSM-metod avtomaticheskogo porozhdeniya gipotez: Logicheskie i epistemologicheskie osnovaniya, (The JSM Method for Automatic Hypothesis Generation: Logical and Epistemological Foundations), Anshakov, O.M., Ed., Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russo, A., Rosell, R., and Rolfo, C., Targeted Therapies for Solid Tumors: A Handbook for Moving Toward New Frontiers in Cancer Treatment, Humana Press, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinho, A.V., Chantrill, L., and Rooman, I., Chronic pancreatitis: A path to pancreatic cancer, Cancer Lett., 2013, vol. 345, no. 2, pp. 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finn, V.K., Distributive lattices of inductive JSM procedures, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2014, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 265–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finn, V.K., About heuristics of JSM studies (additions to articles), Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2019.

Download references

FUNDING

The study was performed with partial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-29-03063MK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to O. P. Shesternikova, V. K. Finn, L. V. Vinokurova, K. A. Les’ko, G. G. Varvanina or E. Yu. Tyulyaeva.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Solovyova

Appendices

APPENDIX 1

The list of features used in the fact base and their data types

No.

Sign name

Data type

 

1. Clinical data

 

1

1.1 Gender

Enumeration

2

1.2 Age

Integer

3

1.3 Body mass index

Number with two decimal digits

4

1.4 Duration of the disease

Number with two decimal digits

5

1.5 Presence of alcohol addiction

Binary type

6

1.6 Availability of tobacco addiction

Binary type

7

1.7 Development of diabetes

Binary type

8

1.8 Pancreatic cancer

Binary type

 

2. Laboratory data

 
 

2.1 Biochemistry

 

9

2.1.1 Total bilirubin

Number with two decimal digits

10

2.1.2 Direct bilirubin

Number with two decimal digits

11

2.1.3 Indirect bilirubin

Number with two decimal digits

12

2.1.4 Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTP)

Number with two decimal digits

13

2.1.6 Glucose

Number with two decimal digits

14

2.1.5 Total protein

Number with two decimal digits

15

2.1.7 c-peptide

Number with two decimal digits

16

2.1.8 Fecal elastase

Number with two decimal digits

 

2.2 General blood test

 

17

2.2.1 Hemoglobin

Number with two decimal digits

18

2.2.2 White blood cells

Number with two decimal digits

19

2.2.3 ESR

Number with two decimal digits

 

2.3 Oncomarkers

 

20

2.3.1 CA 19-9

Number with two decimal digits

21

2.3.2 CA 242

Number with two decimal digits

22

2.3.3 CEA

Number with two decimal digits

 

3. Ultrasound examination

 
 

3.1 Reliable signs of pancreatic cancer (PC)

 

23

3.1.1 Identification of a volumetric neoplasm (more often solid), hypo and isoechoic identification

Binary type

 

3.2 Indirect signs of PC

 

24

3.2.1 Uniform dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) without pronounced wall compaction

Binary type

 

3.3 Direct signs of chronic pancreatitis

 

25

3.3.1 Calcifications

Binary type

 

3.4 Signs of chronic pancreatitis

 

26

3.4.1 Hyperechoic structure of the pancreas

Binary type

27

3.4.2 Uneven dilatation of the MPD, compaction of its walls

Binary type

 

4. Computed tomography (CT)

 

28

4.1 Neoplasms in the structure of the pancreas

Binary type

29

4.2 Biliary hypertension

Binary type

 

4.3 Dilatation of the MPD

 

30

4.3.1 No

Binary type

31

4.3.2 Yes, regular

Binary type

32

4.3.3 Yes, irregular

Binary type

 

4.4 Densitometric characteristics for pancreatic cancer in phases, HU

 
 

4.4.1 Native

 

33

4.4.1.1 min

Integer

34

4.4.1.1 max

Integer

 

4.4.2 Arterial

 

35

4.4.2.1 min

Integer

36

4.4.2.1 max

Integer

 

4.4.3 Venous

 

37

4.4.3.1 min

Integer

38

4.4.3.1 max

Integer

 

4.4.4 Delayed

 

39

4.4.4.1 min

Integer

40

4.4.4.1 max

Integer

 

4.5 Density gradient between tumor and unchanged tissue

 
 

4.5.1 Native

 

41

4.5.1.1 min

Integer

42

4.5.1.1 max

Integer

 

4.5.2 Arterial

 

43

4.5.2.1 min

Integer

44

4.5.2.1 max

Integer

 

4.5.3 Venous

 

45

4.5.3.1 min

Integer

46

4.5.3.1 max

Integer

 

4.5.4 Delayed

 

47

4.5.4.1 min

Integer

48

4.5.4.1 max

Integer

 

4.6 Gradient average

 

49

4.6.1 Native

Number with two decimal digits

50

4.6.2 Arterial

Number with two decimal digits

51

4.6.3 Venous

Number with two decimal digits

52

4.6.4 Delayed

Number with two decimal digits

An example of a correct prediction

The source example for prediction:

0—Id

73

1—Gender

M

2—Age

72

3—BMI

26.4

4—Duration of the disease

4

5—Alcohol

Yes

6—Smoking

Yes

7—ID

No

8—Pancreatic cancer

 

9—Total bilirubin

12.9

10—Direct bilirubin

2.9

11– Indirect bilirubin

10

12– GGTP

202

13—Total protein

70.7

14—Glucose

5.9

15—C-peptide

0.6

16—Fecal elastase

296

17—Hemoglobin

127

18—White blood cells

6.3

19—ESR

33

20—CaA19-9

974

21—CA 242

150

22—CEA

4.5

23—Detection of a voluminous neoplasm (more often solid), hypo and isoechoic detection

Yes

24—(US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of its walls

Yes

25—(US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of its walls

No

26—Hyperechoic structure of the pancreas

Yes

27—(US) Irregular dilatation of the MPD, compaction of its walls

No

28—Neoplasms in the structure of the pancreas

Yes

29—Biliary hypertension

Yes

30—(CT) There is a dilatation of the MPD

No

31—(CT) Regular dilatation of the MPD

Yes

32—(CT) Irregular dilatation of the MPD

No

33—Densitometry (native, min)

20

34—Densitometry (native, max)

77

35—Densitometry (arterial, min)

16

36—Densitometry (arterial, max)

106

37—Densitometry (venous, min)

24

38—Densitometry (venous, max)

121

39—Densitometry (delayed, min)

37

40—Densitometry (delayed, max)

137

41– Gradient (native, min)

24

42—Gradient (native, max)

8

43—Gradient (arterial, min)

8

44—Gradient (arterial, max)

6

45—Gradient (venous, min)

43

46—Gradient (venous, max)

23

47—Gradient (delayed, min)

22

48—Gradient (delayed, max)

29

49—Gradient average (native)

16

50—Gradient average (arterial)

7

51—Gradient average (venous)

33

52—Gradient average (delayed)

25.5

In this example, the system diagnosed PC using the following hypotheses (the signs that have no values in the hypothesis are omitted):

Hypothesis 1

22—CEA

3.1–10.2

25—(US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of walls

No

26—Hyperechoic structure of the gland

Yes

28—Neoplasms in the structure of the pancreas

Yes

49—Gradient average (native)

9–16

Hypothesis 2

4—Duration of the disease

0.45–4

14—Glucose

5.13–6.27

23—Detection of a voluminous neoplasm (more often solid), hypo and isoechoic detection

Yes

25—US) Regular dilatation of the MPD without pronounced compaction of walls

No

26—Hyperechoic structure of the gland

Yes

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shesternikova, O.P., Finn, V.K., Vinokurova, L.V. et al. An Intelligent System for Diagnostics of Pancreatic Diseases. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 53, 288–294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510551905008X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510551905008X

Keywords:

Navigation