Abstract
In what senses can the academy be said to be a site of culture? Does that very idea bear much weight today? Perhaps the negative proposition has more substance, namely that the academy is no longer (if indeed it ever was) a place of culture. After all, we live in dark times-of unbridled power, tyranny, domination and manipulation. Some say that we have entered an age of the posthuman or even the inhuman. It just may be, however, that in such a world, the academic community is needed more than ever for it offers a culture of justified revelation. It is a culture that reveals the world to us in new ways, but in ways that are attested and contested; its judgements emerge out of a critical and unworldly pedantry. With some hesitancy, we can legitimately therefore speak of not just a culture of the academic community but, indeed, the culture of the academic community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, R. (Ed.). (2012). The future university: Ideas and possibilities. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Stony Stratford: Open University Press/SRHE.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C. (1979/1964). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C. (1990/1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Boutang, Y. M. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
Brady, M., & Pritchard, D. (Eds.). (2003). Moral and epistemic virtues. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging knowledge: The university in the knowledge society. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
Finnegan, R. (2005). Participating in the knowledge society: Researchers beyond the university walls. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gellner, E. (1992). Reason and culture: The historic role of rationality and rationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gouldner, A. (1979). The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1989). The theory of communicative action: The critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Kagan, J. (2009). The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and hegemony: the role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek. Contingency, hegemony and universality. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2007/1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Leavis, F. R. (1969). English literature in our time and the university. London: Chatto and Windus.
Lyotard, J-F. (1993/1988). The inhuman: Reflections on time. Cambridge: Polity.
Maxwell, N. (2012). Creating a better world: Towards the university of wisdom. In R. Barnett, op cit.
McNay, I. (2012). Leading strategic change in higher education — closing the implementation gap. Leadership and Governance in Higher Education, issue 4.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University.
Peters, M.A., Gietzen, G., & Ondercin, D. J. (2012). Knowledge socialism: Intellectual commons and openness, in R. Barnett, op cit.
Readings, B. (1997). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Zizek, S. (2000). Class struggle or postmodernism? Yes, please! In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Zizek. Contingency, hegemony and universality. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Barnett, R. The very idea of academic culture: What academy? What culture?. Humaff 24, 7–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0202-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0202-4