Skip to main content
Log in

On The Relations Among Four Methods of Multidimensional Scaling

  • Published:
Behaviormetrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some intriguing relationships among four methods of metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (MDS) are explicated. It is shown that all four methods of MDS considered here amount to solving, explicitly or implicitly, the stationary point of a matrix which can be generally represented as A’HA, where A is a difference matrix (to be defined), and where H depends on a particular criterion being optimized. H may be a matrix of fixed constants or of functions of unknown parameters (stimulus coordinates) of the representation model. A conceptual distinction is made as to the scale level of measurement in reference to MDS methods and solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carroll, J.D. & Chang, J.J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, T.C. (1967). A general model for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Michigan Mathematical Psychology Program, MMPP 67-3, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. (1966). Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 53, 325–338.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1946). An approach to quantifying paired comparisons and rank order. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 17, 144–163.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, C. (1952). On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 3, 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, C. (1973). eij gata suryoka to Torgerson-Gower no hoho o megutte (On eij-type quantification method and Torgerson-Gower method). Nihon Tokeigakkaishi (Journal of the Japanese Statistical Society), 3, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B., Young, F.W. & Seery, J. (1973). How to use KYST; Unpublished user’s manual, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. (1974). Finding a positive semidefinite matrix of prescribed rank r in a nonlinear differentiable manifold; Technical Report, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. (1975). An alternating least squares approach to squared distance scaling; Unpublished manuscript, The University of Leiden, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. (1976). Applications of convex analysis to multidimensional scaling; Proceedings of thd European Meeting of Statistics, Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J.C. & Roskam, E.E. (1973). A mathematical and empirical analysis of two multidimensional scaling algorithms. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, M. & Toda, J. (1973). Suryokariron 4-rui to shuzahyo bunsekiho (Fourth quantification method and principal coordinate analysis). Nikon Tokeigakkaishi (Journal of the Japanese Statistical Society), 3, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, T., Ogawa, S. & Nojima, E. (1972). Deta kaseki (1): suryoka ni kansuru sogo hokoku (Data analysis I: a summary review article on quantification theory). Soken Kiyo, 2, 23–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics; In S.S. Stevens (ed.). Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., Young, F.W. & de Leeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometirka, 42, 7–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, K. & Yanai, H. (1972). Tahenyyo kaiseki no kiso (Foundations of multivariate analysis); Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinpo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Togerson, W.S. (1952). Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika, 17, 401–419.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Young, F.W. (1968). TORSCA-9: a FORTRAN IV program for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Behavioral Science, 13, 343–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, F.W., de Leeuw, J. & Takane, Y. (1976). Quantifying qualitative data; Psychometric Laboratory Report #49, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. & Householder, A.S. (1938). Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika, 3, 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Takane, Y. On The Relations Among Four Methods of Multidimensional Scaling. Behaviormetrika 4, 29–43 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.4.29

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.4.29

Key Words and Phrases

Navigation