Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the Health Status of US Working Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

A Review

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Disease Management & Health Outcomes

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is the seventh leading cause of death (sixth leading cause of death by disease) in the US. Approximately 5.9% of the US population has diabetes and one-third of those with diabetes are unaware that they have the condition. Diabetes is the leading cause of adult blindness, end-stage renal disease, and non-traumatic lower extremity amputation.

The annual per-capita incremental cost of diabetes among employees compared with individuals without diabetes has been estimated at $US4410 (1998 values). Furthermore, more than 30% of the costs associated with diabetic employees are attributable to medically related work absences and disability, and this is estimated to cause a one-third reduction in earnings due to reduced workforce participation.

The incidence of diabetes and long term medical complications could be reduced through more effective diabetes education and patient self-management. Intensive management of diabetes can help workers remain productive, decrease costs associated with complications, and reduce associated costs for overtime. Policy complications from this review encourage employers and Medicare/Medicaid to invest in diabetes education and Wellness programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes: disabling, deadly, and on the rise 2002. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2002

  2. Boyle JP, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM, et al. Projection of diabetes burden through 2050. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(11): 1936–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institutes of Health. Many obese youth have condition that precedes type 2 diabetes [news release]. 2003 Mar 13. Available from URL: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/mew/releases/obese.cfm

  4. Sinha R, Fisch G, Teague B, et al. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 802–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berg GD, Wadhwa S. Diabetes disease management in a community-based setting. Manag Care 2002; 11(6): 42–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Making a difference: the business community takes on diabetes. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Services, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1999. Report No.: NPDP pub #33

  9. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Ericksson JG, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(18): 1343–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(6): 393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burton WN, Connerty RN. Worksite-based diabetes disease management program. Disease Management 2002; 5(1): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wing RR, Goldstein MG, Acton KJ, Behavioral science research in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24_(1): 117–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Songer TJ, Ettaro L, Panel EoDP. Studies on the cost of diabetes: a report prepared for division of diabetes translation. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(3): 917–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peele P, Lave JR, Songer TJ. Diabetes in employer-sponsored health insurance. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(11): 1964–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Allegro J. $100B diabetes costs grab employers’ attention. National Underwriter/Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits 1998; 102(39): 41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramsey S, Summers K, Leong S, et al. Productivity and medical costs of diabetes in a large employer population. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 23–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valdmanis V, Smith DW, Page MR. Productivity and economic burden associated with diabetes. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 129–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayfield JA, Deb P, Whitecotton L. Work disability and diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(7): 1105–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng YC, Jacobs P. Johnson JA. Productivity losses associated with diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 257–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yassin AS, Beckless GL, Messonnier ML. Disability and its economic impact among adults with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44(2): 136–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Employers’ Managed Health Care Association. Taking on diabetes: diabetes in the workplace: how employers can implement change. Employers’ Managed Health Care Association, 2002

  23. American Diabetes Association. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the United States in 1997. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fleming B. The diabetes quality improvement project. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1815–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(1): 213–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rolka DB, Fagot-Campagna A, Narayan KM. Aspirin use among adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(2): 197–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. TRIAD Study Groups. The Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(2): 386–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klonoff D, Schwartz D. An economic analysis of interventions for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 390–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. JAMA 1998; 280(17): 1490–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Burton W, Connerty C. Evaluation of a worksite-based patient education intervention targeted at employees with diabetes mellitus. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 702–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Trief PM, Aquilino C, Paradies K, et al. Impact of the work environment on glycemic control and adaptation to diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(4): 569–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Clark EA. A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care environment improves diabetes outcomes and patient satisfaction. Diabetes Care 2001; 25: 386–9

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gilmer T, O’Connor P, Manning W, et al. The cost to health plans of poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1847–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Menzin J, Langley-Hawthorne C, Friedman M, et al. Potential short-term economic benefits of improved glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 51–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization: efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(12): 2011–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sidorov J, Shull R, Tomcavage J, et al. Does diabetes management save money and improve outcomes? A report of simultaneous short-term savings and quality improvement associated with a health maintenance organization-sponsored disease management program among patients fulfilling health employer data and information set criteria. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 684–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Selecky C. Integrating technology and interventions in the management of diabetes. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9 Suppl. 1: 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  38. National Institute of Health. Diabetes statistics. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1999

  39. Javitt J, Aiello L. Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1996; 119: 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  40. CDC Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Group. Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2002; 287: 2542–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Harris M, Cowie CC, Stern MP, et al. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rodby R, Firth L, Lewis E. An economic analysis of captopril in the treatment of diabetes nephropathy. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 1051–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Elixhauser A, Weschler J, Kitzmiller JL. Cost-benefit analysis of preconception care for women with established diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 1146–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Healey BJ, Hromchak M, Akinci F, et al. Diabetes in the workplace. Proceedings of the Academy of Health Care Management. Las Vegas (NV): Allied Academics, 2002 Nov: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  45. American Diabetes Association. Third-party reimbursement for diabetes care, self-management education, and supplies. Diabetes Care Suppl 2002; 25: S134–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the bibliographical and editorial contributions of Ms Jill Royston, WSU Health Policy and Administration Department Program Assistant and the bibliographical development and refinement work by Mr Dan Simonsen, Washington State University Graduate Student in the Health Policy and Administration Department. The authors received no funding for this manuscript and do not have any conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fevzi Akinci Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akinci, F., Healey, B.J. & Coyne, J.S. Improving the Health Status of US Working Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 11, 489–498 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200311080-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200311080-00002

Keywords

Navigation