Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is the seventh leading cause of death (sixth leading cause of death by disease) in the US. Approximately 5.9% of the US population has diabetes and one-third of those with diabetes are unaware that they have the condition. Diabetes is the leading cause of adult blindness, end-stage renal disease, and non-traumatic lower extremity amputation.
The annual per-capita incremental cost of diabetes among employees compared with individuals without diabetes has been estimated at $US4410 (1998 values). Furthermore, more than 30% of the costs associated with diabetic employees are attributable to medically related work absences and disability, and this is estimated to cause a one-third reduction in earnings due to reduced workforce participation.
The incidence of diabetes and long term medical complications could be reduced through more effective diabetes education and patient self-management. Intensive management of diabetes can help workers remain productive, decrease costs associated with complications, and reduce associated costs for overtime. Policy complications from this review encourage employers and Medicare/Medicaid to invest in diabetes education and Wellness programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes: disabling, deadly, and on the rise 2002. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2002
Boyle JP, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM, et al. Projection of diabetes burden through 2050. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(11): 1936–40
National Institutes of Health. Many obese youth have condition that precedes type 2 diabetes [news release]. 2003 Mar 13. Available from URL: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/mew/releases/obese.cfm
Sinha R, Fisch G, Teague B, et al. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 802–10
Berg GD, Wadhwa S. Diabetes disease management in a community-based setting. Manag Care 2002; 11(6): 42–50
DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–86
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Making a difference: the business community takes on diabetes. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Services, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1999. Report No.: NPDP pub #33
Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Ericksson JG, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(18): 1343–50
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(6): 393–403
Burton WN, Connerty RN. Worksite-based diabetes disease management program. Disease Management 2002; 5(1): 1–8
Wing RR, Goldstein MG, Acton KJ, Behavioral science research in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24_(1): 117–23
Songer TJ, Ettaro L, Panel EoDP. Studies on the cost of diabetes: a report prepared for division of diabetes translation. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(3): 917–32
Peele P, Lave JR, Songer TJ. Diabetes in employer-sponsored health insurance. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(11): 1964–8
D’Allegro J. $100B diabetes costs grab employers’ attention. National Underwriter/Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits 1998; 102(39): 41
Ramsey S, Summers K, Leong S, et al. Productivity and medical costs of diabetes in a large employer population. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 23–9
Valdmanis V, Smith DW, Page MR. Productivity and economic burden associated with diabetes. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 129–30
Mayfield JA, Deb P, Whitecotton L. Work disability and diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(7): 1105–9
Ng YC, Jacobs P. Johnson JA. Productivity losses associated with diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 257–61
Yassin AS, Beckless GL, Messonnier ML. Disability and its economic impact among adults with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44(2): 136–42
Employers’ Managed Health Care Association. Taking on diabetes: diabetes in the workplace: how employers can implement change. Employers’ Managed Health Care Association, 2002
American Diabetes Association. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the United States in 1997. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 296–309
Fleming B. The diabetes quality improvement project. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1815–20
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(1): 213–29
Rolka DB, Fagot-Campagna A, Narayan KM. Aspirin use among adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(2): 197–200
TRIAD Study Groups. The Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(2): 386–9
Klonoff D, Schwartz D. An economic analysis of interventions for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 390–404
Testa MA, Simonson DC. Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. JAMA 1998; 280(17): 1490–6
Burton W, Connerty C. Evaluation of a worksite-based patient education intervention targeted at employees with diabetes mellitus. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 702–6
Trief PM, Aquilino C, Paradies K, et al. Impact of the work environment on glycemic control and adaptation to diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(4): 569–74
Clark EA. A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care environment improves diabetes outcomes and patient satisfaction. Diabetes Care 2001; 25: 386–9
Gilmer T, O’Connor P, Manning W, et al. The cost to health plans of poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1847–53
Menzin J, Langley-Hawthorne C, Friedman M, et al. Potential short-term economic benefits of improved glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 51–5
Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization: efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(12): 2011–7
Sidorov J, Shull R, Tomcavage J, et al. Does diabetes management save money and improve outcomes? A report of simultaneous short-term savings and quality improvement associated with a health maintenance organization-sponsored disease management program among patients fulfilling health employer data and information set criteria. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 684–9
Selecky C. Integrating technology and interventions in the management of diabetes. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9 Suppl. 1: 39–52
National Institute of Health. Diabetes statistics. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1999
Javitt J, Aiello L. Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1996; 119: 36–41
CDC Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Group. Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2002; 287: 2542–51
Harris M, Cowie CC, Stern MP, et al. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1995
Rodby R, Firth L, Lewis E. An economic analysis of captopril in the treatment of diabetes nephropathy. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 1051–61
Elixhauser A, Weschler J, Kitzmiller JL. Cost-benefit analysis of preconception care for women with established diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 1146–57
Healey BJ, Hromchak M, Akinci F, et al. Diabetes in the workplace. Proceedings of the Academy of Health Care Management. Las Vegas (NV): Allied Academics, 2002 Nov: 1–8
American Diabetes Association. Third-party reimbursement for diabetes care, self-management education, and supplies. Diabetes Care Suppl 2002; 25: S134–5
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the bibliographical and editorial contributions of Ms Jill Royston, WSU Health Policy and Administration Department Program Assistant and the bibliographical development and refinement work by Mr Dan Simonsen, Washington State University Graduate Student in the Health Policy and Administration Department. The authors received no funding for this manuscript and do not have any conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akinci, F., Healey, B.J. & Coyne, J.S. Improving the Health Status of US Working Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 11, 489–498 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200311080-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200311080-00002