Abstract
Background
Patients with periampullary cancer frequently suffer obstructive jaundice and commonly require preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for relief and to avoid related complications. Although research has established a correlation between PBD and surgical wound infection, the impact of PBD on major infectious complications (intra-abdominal abscess [IAA]) and overall mortality remains debatable. We hypothesized that PBD could lead to IAA and mortality, and evaluated their correlation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Methods
We enrolled patients undergoing PD at an Asian academic medical center between 2007 and 2016. The types of PBD included endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage (PTCD). The primary outcome was IAA, defined as the presence of pus or infected fluid inside the abdominal cavity and with documented infectious pathogens.
Results
There was one (0.1%) 30-day mortality and eight (0.9%) 90-day mortalities among 899 consecutive patients examined. More than one-quarter of patients had PBD (n = 237, 26.4%; 165 ERBD, 72 PTCD). In the ERBD, PTCD, and non-PBD groups, the IAA rates were 37.0%, 16.7%, and 10.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ERBD (odds ratio 3.67; 95% confidence interval 2.22–6.06; p < 0.001) was the only significant factor associated with IAA. No significant factor was found to analyze variables associated with mortality.
Conclusions
ERBD, but not PTCD, is associated with an increased risk of IAA in patients undergoing PD, which suggests that ERBD should be avoided whenever possible to prevent IAA. Further randomized clinical trials should be conducted to validate this relationship.
Similar content being viewed by others
Periampullary cancers (PACs) are malignant diseases that develop near the ampulla of Vater, including cancer of the second part of the duodenum, head and neck of the pancreas, distal end of the common bile duct (CBD), and the ampulla of Vater.1 Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only potentially curative modality for PACs. Obstructive jaundice, the leading symptom in patients with PAC, impairs liver T lymphocytes and mononuclear cell function in mice models, thereby resulting in susceptibility to infection. In particular, it exacerbates the risk of PD infectious complications and mortality in clinical practice.2,3 Consequently, most patients with jaundice undergo preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) to restore biliary flow, including percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage (PTCD) or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), to improve immunity and nutrition.4
However, recent studies have challenged the routine preoperative placement of biliary stents, which correlated with higher rates of infectious complications and mortality.5,6,7,8,–9 The rationale for elevated infectious complication rates in patients undergoing PBD could be attributed to the insertion of foreign-body stents, causing dissemination of infectious pathogens from the duodenum due to sphincterotomy-related reflux cholangitis with ERBD or from patients’ skin by PTCD.10 The aforementioned risks deteriorate the immune system and increase infectious events, and patients with PD require treatment with intravenous antibiotics to control these secondary and potentially recurrent events. Even worse, patients may have colonization with antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.
In this study, we assessed the correlation of PBD types with intra-abdominal abscess (IAA; a major infectious complication) and overall mortality in patients with PD.
Methods
The Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital approved this single-center, retrospective study protocol (201803035RIND). Of 910 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo PD between January 2007 and December 2016, we retrieved data from a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database.11 We excluded 11 cases because the patients underwent ERBD and PTCD concomitantly. We defined PAC according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and pathologic report, as follows: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC; ICD-9-CM code 157.0), distal CBD cancer (code 156.1), ampulla of Vater cancer (code 156.2), and duodenal cancer (code 152.0). We then used the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to calculate further scores for each patient.12 Biliary drainage was achieved via endoscopic placement of a plastic or metal stent. Antibiotic prophylaxis consisted of intravenous cefmetazole 1 g before PD and every 3 h during surgery. In cases of allergy, we used intravenous ciprofloxacin and metronidazole.
Biliary Drainage Procedures
PBD was performed either through ERBD (endoscopic sphincterotomy and placement of an endobiliary stent into the CBD by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography [ERCP]) or PTCD of the biliary tract under radiologic guidance.13,14 A therapeutic duodenoscope (TJF-180 V; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to perform ERCP.
Intra-Abdominal Abscess and Overall Mortality
IAA was defined as a culture-positive fluid collection from percutaneous drainage,8 and the postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined according to the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.15 The overall 30- or 90-day mortality included all deaths occurring within 30 or 90 days postoperatively, and duration of hospital stay.
Statistical Analysis
In this study, all statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as mean (standard deviation [SD]), number (percentage), or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We compared categorical variables using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test if the numbers were < 5. Conversely, continuous data were compared using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test, and some continuous variables were dichotomized according to predetermined thresholds, which were analyzed as categorical variables. In addition, we performed logistic regression analysis to assess the correlation between types of PBD and IAA/overall mortality, adjusting for clinicopathologic, laboratory, and preoperative antibiotic use. All statistics were two-tailed, and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Results
Intra-Abdominal Abscess
Of 899 patients with PD, 56% were males. Mean age at surgery was 62 years. In addition, 237 (26.4%) patients underwent PBD before PD, including 165 ERBD (18.4%) and 72 PTCD (8.0%) procedures. PBD-related immediate adverse effects included cholangitis (Tokyo Guidelines 201316), pancreatitis (abdominal pain and pancreatic enzyme levels ≥ threefold higher than the upper normal limit), bleeding (clinical evidence of bleeding with the need for intervention or blood transfusion), or bowel perforation (free air located in the abdominal cavity revealed by radiography).17,18 Of the 165 patients with ERBD, 33 (20.0%) had immediate adverse effects (16 had cholangitis, 8 had pancreatitis, 8 had bleeding, and 1 had bowel perforation). In contrast, of the 72 patients with PTCD, 15 (20.8%) had immediate adverse effects (8 had cholangitis, 1 had pancreatitis, and 6 had bleeding). There were no significant differences between the two groups.
Furthermore, we categorized the study population into two groups (PBD and non-PBD groups) (Table 1). Mean age (65.2 vs. 60.4 years; p < 0.001) and maximal preoperative serum bilirubin level (10.5 vs. 2.8 mg/dl; p < 0.001) were higher in the PBD group than in the non-PBD group. Furthermore, higher proportions of CCI score > 2 (79.3% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001), PAC (67.5% vs. 48.6%; p < 0.001), and antibiotic use within 1 month before PD (81.9% vs. 45.6%; p < 0.001) were observed for the PBD group compared with the non-PBD group. The data implied that PBD patients were more ill compared with those in the non-PBD group. Regarding outcomes, the PBD group exhibited higher IAA (30.8% vs. 10.6%; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (2.1% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.020) rates compared with the non-PBD group. We then divided PBD into three categories (non-PBD, ERBD, and PTCD) in the multivariate models (Table 2) because of their distinct procedures. ERBD (OR 3.67, 95% CI 2.22–6.06; p < 0.001) was the only significant factor contributing to IAA.
Overall Mortality
In this study, we observed one (0.1%) 30-day and eight (0.9%) 90-day mortalities among 899 consecutive patients with PD. The cause of mortality was IAA-related septic shock in five patients (62.5%), hepatic failure in one patient (12.5%), myocardial infarction in one patient (12.5%), and bowel necrosis in one patient (12.5%). In addition, we selected 90-day mortality as an endpoint for analysis (Table 3). Mean age in the 90-day mortality group was higher than that in the survival group (72.0 vs. 61.5 years, p = 0.029). On multivariate analysis, no variable was associated with 90-day mortality (Table 4).
Discussion
Reportedly, IAA is a major surgical complication that warrants prompt antibiotic treatment, prolonged hospital stays, or interventional drainage, otherwise sepsis/septic shock could occur, posing a danger to patient life.19 This retrospective study assessed whether ERBD or PTCD before PD correlated with a higher rate of IAA or mortality. Although PBD was not associated with mortality, this study illustrated that ERBD, but not PTCD, was the only significant risk factor contributing to IAA development.
To date, several studies have addressed the correlation between PBD and IAA,8,20,21 which are consistent with our findings. In addition, recent studies supported the cause–effect correlation between bile contamination and surgical infectious complications4,20 because bacterial cultures of infected wounds exhibited a strong correlation with microorganisms found in bile cultures obtained during PD.22,23 PD is a complicated procedure involving resection of the distal CBD and pancreatic head followed by construction. Furthermore, at our institute, the proximal CBD is left unclamped before choledochojejunostomy to prevent cholestasis,11 so that bile contamination may spread from the bile duct to the abdominal cavity. In contrast to PTCD, ERBD accounted for more episodes of ascending cholangitis from contamination of enteral pathogens due to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (sphincterotomy/biliary stenting with ERBD), which may partially explain the correlation between PBD and IAA.
However, several other series reported that PBD did not elevate the IAA rate.4,24 The disparity in results could be explained by two reasons. First, a diverse definition of the diagnostic criteria was used in clinical research. Some studies defined IAA based on a radiologically proven collection with clinical febrile episodes. In this study, we used a stricter definition with documented microorganism cultures rather than solely fluid accumulation, which was a common presentation in PD patients because of the occurrence of a pancreatic fistula. Second, the strategy of using antibiotics during PD could affect the surgical infectious outcomes. A study investigating the ascites cultures at the end of a large volume of normal saline irrigation (7000 mL) in patients with PD reported that 21.1% of the patients exhibited positive colonization of ascites, which correlated with the risk of surgical infectious complication.25 This aforementioned report implied that occult microorganisms still existed inside the abdominal cavity so the appropriate use of perioperative antibiotics might attenuate the abdominal cavity contamination and affect IAA occurrence.
Regarding the effect of PBD on mortality, some series reported higher mortality rates in patients undergoing PBD,6,26 whereas some review articles revealed that PBD did not exert a substantial impact on overall mortality.1,24,27 Notably, the mortality rate in the reports mentioned above could be as high as 12%,26 which was almost sixfold that at high-volume centers (approximately 2%). Owing to complex PD, the quality of surgical skills also interfered with clinical outcomes. In addition, other considerable variations, such as the PBD method, time from drainage to PD, or etiology for PD, existed in published studies, which interfered with these conflicting results. Although PBD did not correlate with mortality, restriction of biliary stenting is extensively advocated with strong clinical evidence.5 The current indication for using PBD to relieve jaundice is neoadjuvant therapy, extended waiting periods for PD, or frequent cholangitis.25,28
Traditionally, both ERBD and PTCD were considered as PBD in clinical studies, although the two procedures might have contrary outcomes owing to the drainage mechanisms. For example, pancreatitis mainly occurs after ERBD because of difficult cannulation, sphincterotomy, and unintentional main pancreatic duct injection.29 Notably, during the study period, three planned Whipple operations were converted to biliary bypass because of severe tissue adhesion and friability associated with ERBD-related pancreatitis (not included in this study). Furthermore, cholangitis was more common after ERBD, which caused a retrograde influx of duodenal content into the biliary tree and malfunction of biliary stents. Recently, some studies showed that the outcomes after ERBD differed from those after PTCD in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing PBD.30,y31 Our findings provide an indication of whether outcomes might differ between these two procedures in PAC patients. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ERBD and PTCD may be required to reach a definitive conclusion. Owing to the diverse presentation of PAC, PDAC patients should be considered as the main study population. The primary outcome parameter was the rate of occurrence of preoperative PBD-related complications during the interval period up to surgery (cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding, bowel perforation, or stent-related occlusion), while the secondary endpoints were postoperative surgical complications, such as wound infection, pancreatic fistula, IAA, or mortality. However, several factors associated with the aforementioned outcomes should be adjusted, including the serum bilirubin level, waiting time for surgery, biliary stent type (plastic vs. metal), stent size, and prophylactic antibiotic regimen before PBD.
This study has the following strengths and limitations. The study design was retrospective and was conducted at a single institute, therefore the findings may not be generalizable. Large, prospective, randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate the correlation between PBD and IAA; however, this is challenging to execute because most patients receive PBD before presenting to surgeons. Furthermore, studies should enroll large case numbers because of the stratification of key factors. Consequently, the data from a consecutive collection of PD provided complementary information to address this issue. Moreover, the overall surgical quality (90-day mortality rate of 0.9%) in this study was comparable with that of other large series,22, 24 and this is one of the largest series analyzing PBD (ERBD vs. PTCD) with IAA and overall mortality with the adjustment of potential confounders (e.g. pathologic factor, serum bilirubin levels, or antibiotic use). Next, the choice of biliary stent (plastic vs. metal stents) during ERBD may interfere with the surgical outcomes because metal stents are associated with a higher rate of stent patency.18 Of the 165 patients with preoperative ERBD, only 10 received a metal stent. We could not perform a subgroup analysis between plastic and metal stents because of the extremely different sample size. Currently, we prefer metal stents for patients in whom neoadjuvant therapy is planned. Further works should be conducted to validate this relationship. Finally, the selection of the PBD method might have been biased by the nature of PACs. ERBD commonly fails because of severe biliary stenosis due to external compression of the cancer or duodenal stenosis, and PTCD becomes a rescue procedure to relieve cholestasis. Although our results favored PTCD, ERBD would be more comfortable and physiologically appropriate for patients in whom neoadjuvant therapy is planned. In this study, only four patients underwent the Whipple operation after neoadjuvant therapy, all of whom had undergone ERBD (three plastic stents and one metal stent) to prevent hepatotoxicity from chemotherapeutic agents.
Conclusions
Our study provided further evidence that patients undergoing ERBD before PD are more likely to suffer IAA. This suggested that ERBD should be avoided whenever possible to prevent IAA. Further randomized clinical trials should be conducted to validate this relationship.
References
Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg. 2013;100(12):1589–1596.
Lai EC, Chu KM, Lo CY, et al. Surgery for malignant obstructive jaundice: analysis of mortality. Surgery. 1992;112(5):891–896.
Dixon JM, Armstrong CP, Duffy SW, Davies GC. Factors affecting morbidity and mortality after surgery for obstructive jaundice: a review of 373 patients. Gut. 1983;24(9):845–852.
Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR, et al. Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234(1):47–55.
van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, van Eijck CHJ, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(2):129–137.
Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shirikhande S, Shah RC, Mullerpatan P, Mohandas KM. Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92(3):356–361.
Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D, et al. Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007;142(3):313–318.
Ng ZQ, Suthananthan AE, Rao S. Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on post-operative infectious complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2017;21(4):212–216.
Costi R, De Pastena M, Malleo G, et al. Poor results of pancreatoduodenectomy in high-risk patients with endoscopic stent and bile colonization are associated with E coli, diabetes and advanced age. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(7):1359–1367.
Augenstein VA, Reuter NP, Bower MR, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR, Martin RC. Bile cultures: a guide to infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(5):478–481.
Wu JM, Kuo TC, Yang CY, et al. Resolution of diabetes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with and without pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(1):242–249.
Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):676–682.
Pancreatric Section, British Society of Gastroenterology, Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Pathologists, Special Interest Group for Gastro-Intestinal Radiology. Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl 5:v1–16.
Glenn F, Evans JA, Mujahed Z, Thorbjarnarson B. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Ann Surg. 1962;156:451–462.
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–591.
Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(1):35–46.
Song TJ, Lee JH, Lee SS, et al. Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of malignant biliary obstruction before primary surgical resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(5):814–821.
Tol JA, van Hooft JE, Timmer R, et al. Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2016;65(12):1981–1987.
Fernandez-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D, et al. Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery. 2012;152(3 Suppl 1):S56–S63.
Povoski SP, Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF. Preoperative biliary drainage: Impact on intraoperative bile cultures and infectious morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3(5):496–505.
Hodul P, Creech S, Pickleman J, Aranha GV. The effect of preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2003;186(5):420–425.
Sahora K, Morales-Oyarvide V, Ferrone C, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage does not increase major complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a large single center experience from the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(3):181–187.
Fong ZV, McMillan MT, Marchegiani G, et al. Discordance Between Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Wound Infection Cultures in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Jama Surg. 2016;151(5):432–439.
Iacono C, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, Bortolasi L, Valdegamberi A, Guglielmi A. Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):191–204.
Sugiura T, Mizuno T, Okamura Y, et al. Impact of bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity during pancreaticoduodenectomy on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. 2015;102(12):1561–1566.
Povoski SP, Karpeh MS, Jr., Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF. Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230(2):131–142.
Garcea G, Chee W, Ong SL, Maddern GJ. Preoperative biliary drainage for distal obstruction the case against revisited. Pancreas. 2010;39(2):119–126.
Wu CH, Ho TW, Wu JM, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage associated with biliary stricture after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a population-based study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(6):308–318.
Ding X, Zhang F, Wang Y. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2015;13(4):218–229.
Al Mahjoub A, Menahem B, Fohlen A, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: is percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage safer and more effective than endoscopic biliary drainage? A meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(4):576–582.
Komaya K, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Verification of the oncologic inferiority of percutaneous biliary drainage to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2017;161(2):394–404.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant Number 107-2634-F-002-015 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, which had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
This work was submitted as an original article, and is not based on a previous communication to a society or meeting.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, JM., Ho, TW., Yen, HH. et al. Endoscopic Retrograde Biliary Drainage Causes Intra-Abdominal Abscess in Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: An Important But Neglected Risk Factor. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 1086–1092 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07189-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07189-y