ABSTRACT
Background
Focused exploration (FE) and bilateral parathyroid exploration (BE) are the standard surgical options for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. However, the relative risk of recurrence, persistence, overall failure, reoperation, and any complications associated with either surgical approach is unclear. This study compared the outcomes and complication rates after FE and BE for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
Methods
PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing these outcomes between FE and BE. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Published data were pooled using the DerSimonian random-effect model, and results were presented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
A total of 12,743 patients from 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. In comparison with BE, the FE arm had comparable rates of recurrence (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.59–2.00; p = 0.80; n = 9 studies), persistence (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.58–1.35; p = 0.58; n = 13), overall failure (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.58–1.34; p = 0.56; n = 13), and reoperation (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.25–4.32; p = 0.95, n = 4). The operative time was significantly shorter (mean difference = −39.86; 95% CI −53.05 to −26.84; p < 0.01, n = 9), with a lower overall complication rate in the FE arm (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.15–0.84; p = 0.02; n = 12). The latter was attributed predominantly to a lower risk of transient hypocalcemia (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14–0.90; p = 0.03; n = 9). There was a significant heterogeneity among these studies for all outcomes except for disease recurrence.
Conclusions
Compared with BE, FE has similar recurrence, persistence, and reoperation rates but significantly lower overall complication rates and shorter operative time.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Hodin R, Angelos P, Carty S, et al. No need to abandon unilateral parathyroid surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:297.
Siperstein A, Berber E, Barbosa GF, et al. Predicting the success of limited exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism using ultrasound, sestamibi, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone: analysis of 1158 cases. Ann Surg. 2008;248:420–8.
Norman J, Lopez J, Politz D. Abandoning unilateral parathyroidectomy: why we reversed our position after 15,000 parathyroid operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:260–9.
Noureldine SI, Gooi Z, Tufano RP. Minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. Gland Surg. 2015;4:410–9.
Chen H, Sokoll LJ, Udelsman R. Outpatient minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a combination of sestamibi-SPECT localization, cervical block anesthesia, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay. Surgery. 1999;126:1012–6.
Norman J, Chheda H, Farrell C. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: decreasing operative time and potential complications while improving cosmetic results. Am Surg. 1998;64:391–6.
Lowney JK, Weber B, Johnson S, Doherty GM. Minimal incision parathyroidectomy: cure, cosmesis, and cost. World J Surg. 2000;24:1442–5.
O’Leary DP, Clover AJ, Galbraith JG, Mushtaq M, Shafiq A, Redmond HP. Adhesive strip wound closure after thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2016;153:408–12.
Bergenfelz A, Lindblom P, Tibblin S, Westerdahl J. Unilateral versus bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002;236:543–51.
Schneider DF, Mazeh H, Chen H, Sippel RS. Predictors of recurrence in primary hyperparathyroidism: an analysis of 1386 cases. Ann Surg. 2014;259:563–8.
Udelsman R. Six hundred fifty-six consecutive explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg. 2002;235:665–70.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006–12.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.
Norlén O, Wang KC, Tay YK, et al. No need to abandon focused parathyroidectomy. Ann Surg. 2015;261:991–6.
Bergenfelz A, Kamigiesser V, Zielke A Nies C, Rothmund M. Conventional bilateral cervical exploration versus open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy under local anaesthesia for primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg. 2005;92:190–7.
Beyer TD, Solorzano CC, Starr F, Nilubol N, Prinz RA. Parathyroidectomy outcomes according to operative approach. Am J Surg. 2007;193:368–72.
Irvin GL, Carneiro DM, Solorzano CC. Progress in the operative management of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism over 34 years. Ann Surg. 2004;239:704–8.
Grant CS, Thompson G, Farley D, van Heerden J.. Primary hyperparathyroidism surgical management since the introduction of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Arch Surg. 2005;140:472–8.
Karakas E, Schneider R, Rothmund M, Bartsch DK, Schlosser K. Initial surgery for benign primary hyperparathyroidism: an analysis of 1,300 patients in a teaching hospital. World J Surg. 2014;38:2011–8.
Hughes DT, Miller BS, Park PB, Cohen MS, Doherty GM, Gauger PG. Factors in conversion from minimally invasive parathyroidectomy to bilateral parathyroid exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2015;154:1428–35.
Bagul A, Patel HP, Chadwick D, Harrison BJ, Balasubramanian SP. Primary hyperparathyroidism: an analysis of failure of parathyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:534–41.
Slepavicius A, Beisa V, Janusonis V, Strupas K. Focused versus conventional parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2008;393:659–66.
McGill J, Sturgeon C, Kaplan SP, Chiu B, Kaplan EL, Angelos P. How does the operative strategy for primary hyperparathyroidism impact the findings and cure rate? A comparison of 800 parathyroidectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:246–9.
Westerdahl J, Bergenfelz A. Unilateral versus bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg. 2007;246:976–81.
Yew MK, Thompson IJ. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: an audit of a change in clinical practice. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:24–6.
Palmer RM, Lokey JS. Is minimally invasive parathyroidectomy reasonable in the nonuniversity setting? Am J Surg. 2006;192:865–8.
Burkey SH, Snyder WH 3rd, Nwariaku F, Watumull L, Mathews D. Directed parathyroidectomy: Feasibility and performance in 100 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Arch Surg. 2003;138:604–9.
Genc H, Morita E, Perrier ND, et al. Differing histologic findings after bilateral and focused parathyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:535–40.
Adler JT, Sippel RS, Chen H. The influence of surgical approach on quality of life after parathyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1559–65.
Russell CFJ, Dolan SJ, Laird JD. Randomized clinical trial comparing scan-directed unilateral versus bilateral cervical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism due to solitary adenoma. Br J Surg. 2006;93:418–21.
Smit PC, Borel Rinkes IH, van Dalen A, van Vroonhoven TJ. Direct, minimally invasive adenomectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: an alternative to conventional neck exploration? Ann Surg. 2000;231:559–65.
Schneider DF, Mazeh H, Sippel RS, Chen H. Is minimally invasive parathyroidectomy associated with greater recurrence compared to bilateral exploration? Analysis of more than 1000 cases. Surgery. 2012;152:1008–15.
Irvin GL 3rd, Dembrow VD, Prudhomme DL. Operative monitoring of parathyroid gland hyperfunction. Am J Surg. 1991;162:299–302.
Ospina NMS, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Maraka S, et al. Outcomes of parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2016;40:2359–77.
Leiker AJ, Yen TW, Eastwood DC, et al. Factors that influence parathyroid hormone half-life: determining if new intraoperative criteria are needed. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:602–6.
Lee NC, Norton JA. Multiple-gland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism: a function of operative approach? Arch Surg. 2002;137:896–900.
Tang T, Dolan S, Robinson B, Delbridge L. Does the surgical approach affect quality of life outcomes? A comparison of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy with open parathyroidectomy. Int J Surg. 2007;5:17–22.
Norman J, Politz D. Prospective study in 3000 consecutive parathyroid operations demonstrates 18 objective factors that influence the decision for unilateral versus bilateral surgical approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:244–9.
Hessman O, Westerdahl J, Al-Suliman N, Christiansen P, Hellman P, Bergenfelz A. Randomized clinical trial comparing open with video-assisted minimally invasive parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg. 2010;97:177–84.
Okoh AK, Sound S, Berber E. Robotic parathyroidectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:240–2.
Reeve TS, Babidge WJ, Parkyn RF, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70:244–50.
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jinih, M., O’Connell, E., O’Leary, D.P. et al. Focused Versus Bilateral Parathyroid Exploration for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 1924–1934 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5694-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5694-1