Abstract
Background
The benefit of chemotherapy for surgically resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains poorly defined. The present study sought to determine the survival impact of chemotherapy for surgically resected ICC.
Methods
Patients with non-metastatic ICC who underwent surgery were identified from the National Cancer Database (1998–2011) and stratified by receipt of chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were analyzed following propensity score modeling using the greedy matching algorithm.
Results
A total of 2751 patients were identified (median age 64 years); 985 (35.8 %) received chemotherapy. Younger age, advanced tumor stage, R1/R2 surgical margins, and lymph node metastasis were all independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Following propensity score matching, advanced tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/R2 surgical margins were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). Median OS comparing patients who received chemotherapy compared with surgery alone was 23 versus 20 months (p = 0.09). However, when stratified by lymph node status, chemotherapy demonstrated a significant improvement in median OS among N1 patients (19.8 vs. 10.7 months; p < 0.001). In contrast, patients with N0 disease derived no benefit from chemotherapy (29.4 vs. 29 months; p = 0.33). Additional tumor characteristics associated with improved survival with chemotherapy included T3/T4 tumors (21.3 vs. 15.6 months; p < 0.001) and R1/R2 surgical margins (19.5 vs. 11.6 months; p = 0.006).
Conclusion
The use of chemotherapy was associated with a survival benefit only for ICC patients with nodal metastasis, advanced tumor stage, or an inadequate surgical resection. Chemotherapy for resected ICC should be strongly considered for tumors harboring high-risk features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Poultsides GA, Zhu AX, Choti MA, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(4):817–37.
Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, et al. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J Hepatol. 2004;40(3):472–7.
Zhu AX, Borger DR, Kim Y, et al. Genomic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: refining prognosis and identifying therapeutic targets. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3827–34.
Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, et al. Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147(12):1107–13.
Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors after surgical resection. World J Surg. 2009;33(6):1247–54.
Endo I, Gonen M, Yopp AC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):84–96.
Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273–81.
Bergstralh E, Kosanke J. Locally written SAS macros: greedy matching algorithm. 2003. http://www.mayo.edu/research/departments-divisions/department-health-sciences-research/division-biomedical-statistics-informatics/software/locally-written-sas-macros. Accessed 19 Sep 2014.
Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, et al. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):565–74.
de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(23):3140–5.
Fisher SB, Patel SH, Kooby DA, et al. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion as selection criteria for adjuvant therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2012;14(8):514–22.
Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(4):384-91.
Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, et al. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1934–40.
Yang B, House MG, Guo M, et al. Promoter methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(3):412–20.
Ferrone CR, Ting DT, Shahid M, et al. The ability to definitively diagnose intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by utilizing novel branched DNA enhanced albumin RNA in situ hybridization technology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4247-8.
Dhanasekaran R, Hemming AW, Zendejas I, et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2013;29(4):1259–67.
Shimada K, Sano T, Nara S, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection during hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma with negative lymph node involvement. Surgery. 2009;145(4):411-6.
Maithel SK, Gamblin TC, Kamel I, et al. Multidisciplinary approaches to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3929–42.
Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29(6):728–33.
Disclosures
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miura, J.T., Johnston, F.M., Tsai, S. et al. Chemotherapy for Surgically Resected Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 3716–3723 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4501-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4501-8