Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the healthcare costs of women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) with those of women who did not.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 904 women treated for stage I–III breast cancer with or without CPM. Women were matched according to age, year at diagnosis, stage, and receipt of chemotherapy. We included healthcare costs starting from the date of surgery to 24 months. We identified whether care was immediate or delayed (CPM within 6 months or 6–24 months after initial surgery, respectively). Costs were converted to approximate Medicare reimbursement values and adjusted for inflation. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of CPM on total breast cancer care costs adjusting for patient characteristics and accounting for matched pairs.

Results

The mean difference between the CPM and no-CPM matched groups was $3,573 (standard error [SE] $455) for professional costs, $4,176 (SE $1,724) for technical costs, and $7,749 (SE $2,069) for total costs. For immediate and delayed CPM, the mean difference for total costs was $6,528 (SE $2,243) and $16,744 (SE $5,017), respectively. In multivariable analysis, the CPM group had a statistically significant increase of 16.9 % in mean total costs compared with the no-CPM group (p < 0.0001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu-positive status, receipt of radiation, and reconstruction were associated with increases in total costs.

Conclusions

CPM significantly increases short-term healthcare costs for women with unilateral breast cancer. These patient-level cost results can be used for future studies that evaluate the influence of costs of CPM on decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, Wallace J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD002748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5203–5209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1362–1367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2697–2704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yi M, Hunt KK, Arun BK, et al. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3(8):1026–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, Stephens J, Farrar WB, Agnese DM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2691–2696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2158–2164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewster AM, Parker PA. Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(7):935–941.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz SJ, Morrow M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: addressing peace of mind. JAMA. 2013;310(8):793–794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson K, Jacobson JS, Heitjan DF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preventive strategies for women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(6):397–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grann VR, Patel PR, Jacobson JS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125(3):837–847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC. Benefit of prophylactic mastectomy for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. JAMA. 2000;283(23):3070–3072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zendejas B, Moriarty JP, O’Byrne J, Degnim AC, Farley DR, Boughey JC. Cost-effectiveness of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus routine surveillance in patients with unilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(22):2993–3000.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS): Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2000–2001. Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp.

  15. Frost MH, Slezak JM, Tran NV, et al. Satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: the significance of mastectomy type, reconstructive complications, and body appearance. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(31):7849–7856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barton MB, West CN, Liu IL, et al. Complications following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:61–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crosby MA, Garvey PB, Selber JC, et al. Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1025–1033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brewster AM, Bedrosian I, Parker PA, et al. Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status. Cancer. 2012;118(22):5637–5643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burkhardt JH, Sunshine JH. Core-needle and surgical breast biopsy: comparison of three methods of assessing cost. Radiology. 1999;212(1):181–188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(1):102–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Federal Register. Statewide average operating cost-to-charge ratios for urban and rural hospitals. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services; 1997–2010.

  22. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer price index—all urban consumers; 2010. http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/consumer-price-index-and-annual-percent-changes-from-1913-to-2008/. Accessed 6 May 2014.

  23. Khoo A, Kroll SS, Reece GP, et al. A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(4):964–968;discussion 969-970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Geel AN. Prophylactic mastectomy: the Rotterdam experience. Breast. 2003;12(6):357–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee MC, Bhati RS, von Rottenthaler EE, et al. Therapy choices and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors: a short-term follow-up. Am J Surg. 2013;206(5):625–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Elting LS, Shih YC, Stiff PJ, et al. Economic impact of palifermin on the costs of hospitalization for autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant: analysis of phase 3 trial results. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13(7):806–813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nigrovic LE, Chiang VW. Cost analysis of enteroviral polymerase chain reaction in infants with fever and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(8):817–821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zupancic JA, Richardson DK, O’Brien BJ, Eichenwald EC, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness analysis of predischarge monitoring for apnea of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):146–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Neumann PJ, Palmer JA, Nadler E, Fang C, Ubel P. Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologists. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(1):196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gimbel RW, Fontelo P, Stephens MB, et al. Radiation exposure and cost influence physician medical image decision making: a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 2013;51(7):628–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Robert Prater for research data support, and Zach Bohannan and Dawn Chalaire for editorial contributions that enhanced the quality of the manuscript. Financial support for this study was provided by grant number 5 R21 CA149803 (AMB, PAP) from the National Cancer Institute, and National Institute of Health Cancer Center Support grant P30CA016672 for shared resources. The funding agreements ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, and writing and publishing the report.

Disclosure

Ashish A. Deshmukh, Scott B. Cantor, Melissa A. Crosby, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Susan K. Peterson, Patricia A. Parker, and Abenaa M. Brewster declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott B. Cantor PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deshmukh, A.A., Cantor, S.B., Crosby, M.A. et al. Cost of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2823–2830 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3759-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3759-6

Keywords

Navigation