Skip to main content
Log in

Correlating Cellulose Derivative Intrinsic Viscosity with Mechanical Susceptibility of Swollen Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrophilic matrix tablets are prone to mechanical stress while passing through the gastrointestinal tract, which may result in inappropriate drug-release characteristics. Intrinsic viscosity is a physical polymer property that can be directly compared across various types and grades of polymers and correlated with the mechanical susceptibility of swollen matrix tablets. Five tablet formulations containing different HPMC and HPC polymers were prepared and analyzed using an in vitro glass bead manipulation test. The dissolution rate results were modeled using the Korsmeyer–Peppas equation and a correlation was found between the fit constants k and n, goodness-of-fit measure parameters, and intrinsic viscosity. Moreover, the dissolution profiles were used to calculate the degree of mechanical susceptibility for each formulation, defined as the ratio of the average dissolution rate after manipulation and the initial dissolution rate before manipulation. It was confirmed that an increased intrinsic viscosity polymer value resulted in a decrease in mechanical susceptibility. Considering this, two simple rules were defined for designing robust matrix tablets with respect to mechanical stresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu P, Ju T, Qiu Y. Diffusion-controlled drug delivery systems. In: Li X, Jasti BR, editors. Design of controlled release drug delivery systems. United States: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 107–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Z, Shmeis RA. Dissolution controlled drug delivery systems. In: Li X, Jasti BR, editors. Design of controlled release drug delivery systems. United States: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 139–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Hydrophilic matrices for controlled drug delivery: an improved mathematical model to predict the resulting drug release kinetics (the “Sequential Layer” model). Pharm Res. 2000;17(10):1290–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgartner S, Kristl J, Peppas N. Network structure of cellulose ethers used in pharmaceutical applications during swelling and at equilibrium. Pharm Res. 2002;19:1084–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner S, Lahajnar G, Sepe A, Kristl J. Investigation of the state and dynamics of water in hydrogels of cellulose ethers by 1H NMR spectroscopy. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2002;3(4):E36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumgartner S, Lahajnar G, Sepe A, Kristl J. Quantitative evaluation of polymer concentration profile during swelling of hydrophilic matrix tablets using 1H NMR and MRI methods. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005;59:299–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McConnell EL, Fadda HM, Basit AW. Gut instincts: explorations in intestinal physiology and drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2008;364:213–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrahamsson B, Alpsten M, Bakec B, Larsson A, Sjoegren J. In vitro and in vivo erosion of two different hydrophilic gel matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;46:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mudie DM, Amidon GL, Amidon GE. Physiological parameters for oral delivery and in vitro testing. Mol Pharm. 2010;7(5):1388–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weitschies W, Blume H, Mönnikes H. Magnetic marker monitoring: high resolution real-time tracking of oral solid dosage forms in the gastrointestinal tract. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74:93–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman K, Hodges LA, Band J, Stevens HNE, Weitschies W, Wilson CG. Assessing gastrointestinal motility and disintegration profiles of magnetic tablets by a novel magnetic imaging device and gamma scintigraphy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74:84–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamba M, Seta Y, Kusai A, Nishimura K. Comparison of the mechanical destructive force in the small intestine of dog and human. Int J Pharm. 2002;237:139–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abrahamsson B, Albery T, Eriksson A, Gustafsson I, Sjoberg M. Food effects on tablet disintegration. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22:165–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abrahamsson B, Pal A, Sjoberg AM, Carlsson M, Laurell E, Brasseur JG. A novel in vitro and numerical analysis of shear-induced drug release from extended-release tablets in the fed stomach. Pharm Res. 2005;22:1215–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sako K, Sawada T, Nakashima H, Yokohama S, Sonobe T. Influence of water soluble fillers in hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices on in vitro and in vivo drug release. J Con Rel. 2002;81:165–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garbacz G, Wedemeyer R, Nagel S, Giessmann T, Mönnike H, Wilson CG, Siegmund W, Weitschies W. Irregular absorption profiles observed from diclofenac extended release tablets can be predicted using a dissolution test apparatus that mimics in vivo physical stresses. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;70:421–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Campos-Aldrete ME, Villafuerte-Robles L. Influence of the viscosity grade and the particle size of HPMC on metronidazole release from matrix tablet. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1997;43:173–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel VF, Patel NM. Statistical evaluation of influence of viscosity and content of polymer on dipyridamole release from floating matrix tablets: a technical note. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2007;8(3):E69.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell SA, Balwinski KM. A framework to investigate drug release variability arising from hypromellose viscosity specifications in controlled release matrix tablets. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:2277–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fettaka M, Issaadi R, Moulai-Mostefa N, Dez I, Le Cerf D, Picton L. Thermo sensitive behavior of cellulose derivatives in dilute aqueous solutions: From macroscopic to mesoscopic scale. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;357(2):372–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hiemenz PC, Lodge TP. Polymer Chemistry, Second Edition. Florida: CRC, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton. 2007; p. 338–339.

  22. Feller RM, Wilt M. Evaluation of Cellulose Ethers for Conservation. The Getty Conservation Institute. 1990. http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/ethers.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  23. USP-NF Online. US Pharmacopoeia, Rockville. http://www.uspnf.com. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.

  24. R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2010. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 16 Dec 2011.

  25. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm. 1983;15:25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saša Baumgartner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klančar, U., Horvat, M. & Baumgartner, S. Correlating Cellulose Derivative Intrinsic Viscosity with Mechanical Susceptibility of Swollen Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 13, 903–910 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9811-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9811-6

Key words

Navigation