Skip to main content
Log in

Formulation and Evaluation of Buccal Patches for Delivery of Atenolol

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buccal patches for the delivery of atenolol using sodium alginate with various hydrophilic polymers like carbopol 934 P, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in various proportions and combinations were fabricated by solvent casting technique. Various physicomechanical parameters like weight variation, thickness, folding endurance, drug content, moisture content, moisture absorption, and various ex vivo mucoadhesion parameters like mucoadhesive strength, force of adhesion, and bond strength were evaluated. An in vitro drug release study was designed, and it was carried out using commercial semipermeable membrane. All these fabricated patches were sustained for 24 h and obeyed first-order release kinetics. Ex vivo drug permeation study was also performed using porcine buccal mucosa, and various drug permeation parameters like flux and lag time were determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoogstrate AJ, Verhoef JC, Tuk B, Pijpers A, van Leengoed LAMG, Verheijden JHM, et al. In vitro buccal delivery of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4400 with glycodeoxycholate as an absorption enhancer in pigs. J Pharm Sci. 1996;85:457–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Design and characterization of chitosan-containing mucoadhesive buccal patches of propranolol hydrochloride. Acta Pharm. 2007;57:61–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vashmi Vishnu Y, Chandrasekhar K, Ramesh G, Madhusudan Rao Y. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of carvedilol. Curr Drug Deliv. 2007;4:27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khairnar A, Jain P, Baviskar D, Jain D. Development of mucoadhesive buccal patch containing aceclofenac: in-vitro evaluation. Int J Pharm Sci. 2009;1(1):91–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hao J, Heng PWS. Buccal delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(8):821–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Budavari S (ed). The Merck Index, 13th edn. Merck & Co. Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2001, p. 147.

  7. The Indian Pharmacopoeia. The Controller of Publications. Ministry of Health. Govt. of India. New Delhi, 1996. Vol I. p. 72.

  8. Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SHS. Binding of acyclic polymer to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure–property relationships. CRC Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Systems. 1988;21:21–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verma N, Wahi AK, Verma A, Chattopadhayay P. Evaluation of a mucoadhesive buccal patch for delivery of atenolol: in vitro screening of bioadhesion. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2007;1:115–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jug M, Beirevi-Laan M, Bengez S. Novel cyclodextrin-based film formulation intended for buccal delivery of atenolol. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2009;35(7):796–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Satishbabu BK, Srinivasan BP. Preparation and evaluation of buccoadhesive films of atenolol. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2008;70(2):175–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nafee NA, Ahemed F, Borale A. Preparation and evaluation of mucoadhesive patches for delivery of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). Acta Pharma. 2003; 199–212.

  13. Attama A, Akpa PA, Onugwu LE, Igwilo G. Novel buccoadhesive delivery system of hydrochlorothiazide formulated with ethyl cellulose hydroxypropyl methylcellulose interpolymer complex. Scientific Res Essay. 2008;3(6):26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of bioadhesion strength of muco-adhesive buccal tablet: design of an in vitro assembly. Indian Drugs. 1992;30:152–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raghuraman S, Velrajan G, Ravi R, Jeyabalan B, Johnson DB, Sankar V. Design and evaluation of propranolol hydrochloride buccal films. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(1):32–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Park H, Robinson JR. Mechanism of bioadhesion of poly (acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm Res. 1987;4:457–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah JC. Analysis of permeation data: evaluation of lag time method. Int J Pharm. 1993;90:161–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks to Principal (Dr. Dilipkumar Pal) and management of Seemanta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jharpokharia, India for providing necessary facilities throughout this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswaranjan Mohanty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adhikari, S.N.R., Nayak, B.S., Nayak, A.K. et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Buccal Patches for Delivery of Atenolol. AAPS PharmSciTech 11, 1038–1044 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9459-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9459-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation