Abstract
Buccal patches for the delivery of atenolol using sodium alginate with various hydrophilic polymers like carbopol 934 P, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in various proportions and combinations were fabricated by solvent casting technique. Various physicomechanical parameters like weight variation, thickness, folding endurance, drug content, moisture content, moisture absorption, and various ex vivo mucoadhesion parameters like mucoadhesive strength, force of adhesion, and bond strength were evaluated. An in vitro drug release study was designed, and it was carried out using commercial semipermeable membrane. All these fabricated patches were sustained for 24 h and obeyed first-order release kinetics. Ex vivo drug permeation study was also performed using porcine buccal mucosa, and various drug permeation parameters like flux and lag time were determined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hoogstrate AJ, Verhoef JC, Tuk B, Pijpers A, van Leengoed LAMG, Verheijden JHM, et al. In vitro buccal delivery of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4400 with glycodeoxycholate as an absorption enhancer in pigs. J Pharm Sci. 1996;85:457–60.
Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Design and characterization of chitosan-containing mucoadhesive buccal patches of propranolol hydrochloride. Acta Pharm. 2007;57:61–72.
Vashmi Vishnu Y, Chandrasekhar K, Ramesh G, Madhusudan Rao Y. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of carvedilol. Curr Drug Deliv. 2007;4:27–39.
Khairnar A, Jain P, Baviskar D, Jain D. Development of mucoadhesive buccal patch containing aceclofenac: in-vitro evaluation. Int J Pharm Sci. 2009;1(1):91–5.
Hao J, Heng PWS. Buccal delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(8):821–32.
Budavari S (ed). The Merck Index, 13th edn. Merck & Co. Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2001, p. 147.
The Indian Pharmacopoeia. The Controller of Publications. Ministry of Health. Govt. of India. New Delhi, 1996. Vol I. p. 72.
Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SHS. Binding of acyclic polymer to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure–property relationships. CRC Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Systems. 1988;21:21–67.
Verma N, Wahi AK, Verma A, Chattopadhayay P. Evaluation of a mucoadhesive buccal patch for delivery of atenolol: in vitro screening of bioadhesion. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2007;1:115–8.
Jug M, Beirevi-Laan M, Bengez S. Novel cyclodextrin-based film formulation intended for buccal delivery of atenolol. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2009;35(7):796–807.
Satishbabu BK, Srinivasan BP. Preparation and evaluation of buccoadhesive films of atenolol. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2008;70(2):175–9.
Nafee NA, Ahemed F, Borale A. Preparation and evaluation of mucoadhesive patches for delivery of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). Acta Pharma. 2003; 199–212.
Attama A, Akpa PA, Onugwu LE, Igwilo G. Novel buccoadhesive delivery system of hydrochlorothiazide formulated with ethyl cellulose hydroxypropyl methylcellulose interpolymer complex. Scientific Res Essay. 2008;3(6):26–33.
Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of bioadhesion strength of muco-adhesive buccal tablet: design of an in vitro assembly. Indian Drugs. 1992;30:152–5.
Raghuraman S, Velrajan G, Ravi R, Jeyabalan B, Johnson DB, Sankar V. Design and evaluation of propranolol hydrochloride buccal films. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002;64(1):32–6.
Park H, Robinson JR. Mechanism of bioadhesion of poly (acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm Res. 1987;4:457–64.
Shah JC. Analysis of permeation data: evaluation of lag time method. Int J Pharm. 1993;90:161–9.
Acknowledgements
Sincere thanks to Principal (Dr. Dilipkumar Pal) and management of Seemanta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jharpokharia, India for providing necessary facilities throughout this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adhikari, S.N.R., Nayak, B.S., Nayak, A.K. et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Buccal Patches for Delivery of Atenolol. AAPS PharmSciTech 11, 1038–1044 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9459-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9459-z