Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inter-Satellite Communication for LEO CubeSat Network: QoS Parameters and Feasibility of Massive MIMO

  • THEORY AND METHODS OF SIGNAL PROCESSING
  • Published:
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluates inter-satellite communication for a low earth orbit CubeSat network. This paper consists of two parts: determination and estimation of quality of service (QoS) parameters and evaluation of the feasibility of a Massive Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) system for inter-satellite links. CubeSats are low-cost and small satellites that were initially designed by students during the educational process but are now launched for conducting space research and for commercial use. Recently, some companies and research studies promoted CubeSats to build a wireless communication networks for different proposes, such as earth observation, weather forecasting, providing access to the internet, internet of things and machine to machine services. The main distinguishing features of a CubeSat network include low-cost and fast deployment with a consequent advantage: the possibility to build a large network (hundreds of spacecraft) with limited resources. However, due to the limited size and function of CubeSats, the feasibility of a CubeSat network with inter-satellite links is debatable. In this paper, we investigate the QoS parameters for an inter-satellite link and factors affecting it. The theoretical design with a constructive drawing of massive MIMO has been made. The possibility and time duration of inter-satellite communication has been calculated for three different cases using real data and including Massive MIMO. The simulation of orbit movements for groups of CubeSats has been made. The correlation between relative positions of satellites in orbits, parameters of communication channels and the QoS was determined. The feasibility of massive MIMO for CubeSat communications has been estimated. Based on simulation results, suggestions and possible technical and non-technical solutions were highlighted together with future studies and simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Mehrparvar, D. Pignatelli, J. Carnahan, R. Munakat, W. Lan, A. Toorian, and S. Lee, “Cubesat design specification rev. 13,” in The CubeSat Program (Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, US, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. “Characteristics, definitions and spectrum requirements of nanosatellites and picosatellites, as well as stems composed of such satellites,” Report ITU, ITU-R SA 2312-0 (2014).

  3. Danil Bulanov, Yang Wang, and Qian-Bin Chen, “Feasibility of intersatellite communication for CubeSats,” DEStech Trans. on Comput. Sci. Eng. iceit (2017).

  4. “Nanosatellite & Cubesat Database,” nanosats.eu. [Online]. Available: http://www.nanosats.eu/ [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2018].

  5. “Planet–Company,” planet.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.planet.com/company/ [Accessed: Jun. 12, 2017].

  6. “Startup planet labs controls the most private satellites-edgy labs,” edgylabs.com. [Online]. Available: https://edgylabs.com/2017/03/02/planet-labs-private-satellites/ [Accessed: Jun. 12, 2017].

  7. D. G. Pantenkov and N. V. Gusakov, “Computer simulation of active phased array antenna,” Kosmich. Tekh. Tekhnol., No. 1, 34–39 (2013).

  8. “CelesTrak: ”More frequently asked questions,” celestrak.com. [Online]. Available: http:// celestrak.com/columns/v04n05/ [Accessed: Jun. 12, 2017].

  9. D. Vallado, P. Crawford, R. Hujsak, and T. S. Kelso, “Revisiting spacetrack report# 3,” in Proc. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conf. and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-Located Conf., Keystone, Colo, USA, Aug. 2006 (Am. Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006), p. 6753.

  10. Hoots, Felix R., Ronald L. Roehrich, and T. S. Kelso, “Spacetrack report No. 3,” in Project Spacetrack Reports, Office of Astrodynamics, Aerospace Defense Center, ADC/DO6 (Peterson AFB, CO 80914, 1980).

  11. V. A. Chagina, D. A. Grishko, and V. I. Maiorova, “Satellite’s trajectory propagation at near circular orbits using TLE files in the simplified SGP model,” Sci. Education of Bauman MGTU, No. 1, 52–66 (2016). doi 10.7463/0116.0830533

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Björnson, “Massive MIMO bringing the magic of asymptotic analysis to wireless networks,” in Int. Workshop on Computer-Aided Modeling Analysis and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) Dec. 1, 2014.

  13. Ta-Sung Lee, Massive MIMO and Its Applications in 5G Systems (Inst. Communications Engineering, National Chiao Tung Univ., 2016).

  14. R. Heath, N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. Sayeed, “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,” IEEE J. of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 10, 436-453 (2016). doi 10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2523924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Fokin, D. Volgushev, A. Kireev, D. Bulanov, and V. Lavrukhin, “Designing the MIMO SDR-based LPD transceiver for long-range robot control applications,” in Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT), 2014 6th Int. Congress, 2014 (IEEE, 2014). doi 10. 1109/ICUMT.2014.7002144.

  16. Assembly, ITU-R R12-CPM15.02-R-0001: “CPM Report on technical, operational and regulatory/procedural matters to be considered by the World Radiocommunication Conference”, Report (ITU, 862, 2015).

  17. P. Muri and J. McNair, “A survey of communication sub-systems for intersatellite linked systems and CubeSat missions.” JCM 7, 290–308 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. “Single CubeSat solar panels”, isispace.nl. [Online]. Available https://www.isispace.nl/product/isis-cubesat-solar-panels/ [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2018].

  19. A. Akimov, V. Chazov, L. Kurakhtenkov and S. Smirnov. “Mobile satellite communication system Iridium: 18 years on service in space,” Zh. Tekh. i Sredstva Svyazi, No. 2, 56–61, (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was financially supported by the Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunication Science Foundation (A2014-31 A2015-28), Chongqing Education Committee Fund (KJ1600417).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Communication and Information Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 400065, Chongqing, China

    D. Bulanov, Y. Wang & Q.-Bin Chen

  2. R&D Center “Lartech Telecom”, 194100, St. Petersburg, Russia

    K. Ocheretyanyy

Authors
  1. D. Bulanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Ocheretyanyy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Q.-Bin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Bulanov.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulanov, D., Ocheretyanyy, K., Wang, Y. et al. Inter-Satellite Communication for LEO CubeSat Network: QoS Parameters and Feasibility of Massive MIMO. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 63, 1174–1182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226918100054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226918100054

Keywords:

Search

Navigation