Skip to main content
Log in

Refining of nonionic surfactant micellization theory based on the law of mass action

  • Published:
Colloid Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two approaches to determining critical micelle concentration (CMC) are assessed, i.e., from the inflection point in the curve for the concentration dependence of the degree of micellization and as K 1/(1–n), where K is the constant of the law of mass action and n is the aggregation number. The latter approach makes the theory simpler, while the former explicitly expresses the critical degree of micellization via the aggregation number. The concentrations of monomers and micelles are analyzed as functions of the overall concentration of a surfactant in a micellar solution. These functions look much simpler in the graphical form as compared with their complex exact analytical representation. This has resulted in derivation of simple analytical approximations for these functions, with these approximations being useful for calculations. The concentration dependence of the surfactant diffusion coefficient has been considered based on these approximations. It turned out that this dependence not only provides the known method for determining the diffusion coefficient of micelles, but also gives the possibility in principle to determine the aggregation number from the slope of the dependence of the diffusion coefficient on the inverse concentration (counted from the CMC in the CMC units). This new method for determining the aggregation number has been tested using the literature data on the diffusion coefficient of penta(ethylene glycol)-1-hexyl ether in an aqueous solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rusanov, A.I., Mitselloobrazovanie v rastvorakh poverkhnostno-aktivnykh veshchestv (Micellization in Surfactant Solutions), St. Petersburg: Khimiya, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lindman B. and Wennerström, H., Top. Curr. Chem., 1980, vol. 87, pp. 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eicke H.-F., Top. Curr. Chem., 1980, vol. 87, pp. 85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rusanov, A.I., Langmuir, 2014, vol. 30, pp. 14443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, D.F., Mukherjee, S., Mitchell, D.J., and Ninham, B.W., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1983, vol. 93, pp. 184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rusanov, A.I., Colloid J., 2016, vol. 78, pp. 102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinheimer, R.M., Evans, D.F., and Cussler, E.L., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1981, vol. 80, pp. 357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rusanov, A.I. and Fainerman, V.B., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1989, vol. 308, pp. 651.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sutherland, E., Mercer, S., Everist, M., and Leaist, D., J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2009, vol. 54, pp. 272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paduano, L., Sartorio, R., Vitagliano, V., and Costantino, L., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1997, vol. 189, pp. 189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Rusanov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.I. Rusanov, 2016, published in Kolloidnyi Zhurnal, 2016, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 358–364.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rusanov, A.I. Refining of nonionic surfactant micellization theory based on the law of mass action. Colloid J 78, 371–377 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061933X16030133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061933X16030133

Navigation