Abstract
BACKGROUND: Residency training programs use the night float system increasingly to meet the new resident work hour regulations.
OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare residents’, attendings’, and nurses’ perceptions of the night float system.
DESIGN: A survey study.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seven residents, 48 attendings, and 69 nurses in a university-based multicenter internal medicine residency program.
MEASUREMENTS: Perceived impact on patient care, resident training, and resident performance.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 75%. In general, more residents than both attendings and nurses had positive opinions regarding the night float system, particularly in relation to patient care. Only a small proportion of residents and attendings thought positively about the night float’s impact on training quality (29.9%; 18.2%), daily feedback (23.0%; 9.1%), and end of rotation evaluation (21.8%; 6.1%). Less than half of the nurses had positive perceptions of the night residents’ performance in terms of promptness (40.9%), physical availability (38.6%), familiarity with the patients’ cases, and management plans (15.9%), communication of management plans to nurses (36.4%), professional respect and trust (43.2%), and teamwork (45.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Residents had more positive perceptions than attendings and nurses. Nurses, in particular, had negative perceptions of resident performance in the setting of the night float system.
References
Veasey S, Rosen R, Barzansky B, Rosen I, Owens J. Sleep loss and fatigue in residency training: a reappraisal. JAMA. 2002;288:1116–24.
Weinger MB, Ancoli-Israel S. Sleep deprivation and clinical performance. JAMA. 2002;287:955–7.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education C. Common duty hour standards for programs, 2002. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/. Accessed October 2004.
Morelock JA, Stern DT. Shifting patients: how residency programs respond to residency review committee requirements. Am J Med. 2003;115:163–9.
Bekes CE. A time for work and a time for rest. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:987–8.
Lieu TA, Forrest CB, Blum NJ, Cornfeld D, Polin RA. Effects of a night-float system on resident activities and parent satisfaction. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:307–10.
Schwartz AJ, Black ER, Goldstein MG, Jozefowicz RF, Emmings FG. Levels and causes of stress among residents. J Med Educ. 1987;62:744–53.
Buff DD, Shabti R. The night float system of resident on call: what do the nurses think? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:400–2.
Cavallo A, Ris MD, Succop P. The night float paradigm to decrease sleep deprivation: good solution or a new problem? Ergonomics. 2003;46:653–63.
Lofgren RP, Gottlieb D, Williams RA, Rich EC. Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:501–5.
Griffith CH III, Wilson JF, Rich EC. Intern call structure and patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:308–10.
Akl EA, Maroun N, Klocke RA, Schünemann HJ. Is shorter better? A survey of internal medicine residents and faculty about the duration of attendings’ inpatient rotations. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1133–9.
Barden CB, Specht MC, McCarter MD, Daly JMF, Fahey TJ. Effects of limited work hours on surgical training. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:531–8.
Niederee MJ, Knudtson JL, Byrnes MC, Helmer SD, Smith RS. A survey of residents and faculty regarding work hour limitations in surgical training programs. Arch Surg. 2003;138:663–9.
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
The Research for Health in Erie County Inc., the Graduate Medical Education of the University at Buffalo, and the Italian National Cancer Institute in Rome, Italy, funded this study. The funding source was not involved in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Investigators received salary support from institutional sources.
Author contributions: Conception and design: E.A.A., H.J.S, J.I.; analysis and interpretation of data: E.A.A., H.J.S.; drafting of the article: E.A.A., H.J.S.; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: E.A.A., A.B., E.R., J.I., B.G., H.J.S.; final approval of the article: E.A.A, A.B., E.R., J.I., B.G., H.J.S.; provision of study materials or patients: E.A.A., A.B., E.R., J.I., B.G., H.J.S.; statistical expertise: H.J.S., E.A.; obtaining of funding: E.A., H.J.S, A.B.; administrative, technical, or logistic support: Linda Sachs; collection and assembly of data: E.A., A.B., H.J.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akl, E.A., Bais, A., Rich, E. et al. Brief report: Internal medicine residents’, attendings’, and nurses’ perceptions of the night float system. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 494–497 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00434.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00434.x