Abstract
This article explores the design, organization, decision-making processes and the final products of the first phase of the Project for Planning for Climate Change in Peru (PlanCC Project) between 2012 and 2014. It sheds light on a set of institutional factors that the author suggests are observed when dealing with the implantation of climate change mitigation policies and plans in a developing country context. This project confronted from its beginning, a series of institutional challenges that posed political, technical and administrative difficulties. This fact forced public officials to opt for a mixed public–private solution for the technical coordination and administration of the project, one that allowed PlanCC to deliver its proposed outputs on time. The article highlights key lessons learnt from this experience and suggests the importance of focusing on the diverse institutional, political and development contexts in order to enhance opportunities for aligning national and regional development priorities around global climate change mitigation goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Bicentennial Plan is a national strategic planning instrument intended to organize a set of main national objectives and goals having as a horizon the year 2021, the bicentennial Independence celebration for the Peruvian republic.
References
Earl, S., F. Carden and T. Smutylo. 2001. Outcome mapping building learning and reflection into development programs. International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada. https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/outcome-mapping-building-learning-and-reflection-development-programs.
PlanCCPeru. 2014. Memoirs and reports PlanCC phase I. PlanCCPeru, Lima. http://planccperu.org/fase-i-2.
Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros. 2015. Informe Final de la Comisión Multisectorial. Resolución Suprema Nº 129-2015-PCM. Lima. http://www.minam.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Informe-Técnico-Final-CM-_-R-S-129-2015-PCM_Secretar%C3%ADa-Técnica-18-09-2015-vf.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chávez Granadino, J. Institutional and Political Factors in Creating a Community of Practice on Mitigation: The Case of PlanCC, Peru. Development 59, 342–349 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0108-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0108-7