Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘It Sells, But It Does Not Fly’: An Early Assessment of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

  • Dialogue
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

In September 2015 the United Nations General Assembly formally accepted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. More commonly known as the ‘Sustainable Development Goals’, the 2030 Agenda will reflect the values and direct the actions and the resources of the global development industry for the next decade and a half. We interviewed key informants—civil society representatives, government officials, and development practitioners—who were either part of or closely observed the process leading up to the publication of the SDGs. We asked them what their early assessment of Agenda 2030 was, and whether in their view, it would indeed, eliminate poverty, inequalities, and inequities by 2030. We have integrated these assessments with those published in the academic literature that has emerged since September 2015, to map the emerging narratives—critical and supportive. We have found some optimism about the broad outlines of the development project, but also significant scepticism about its detail. For the SDGs to be deemed a success, real development should aim to subvert reactionary elements, whilst at the same time working creatively, to forge new alliances in seeking out new agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. For instance, see Edelman (1988), Fischer (2003), Schön and Rein (1994), Rochefort and Cobb (1995), Stone (2002), Ingram and Schneider (2005).

  2. See Starrs (2015), Cornwall and Rivas (2015), Denney (2015), Esquivel and Sweetman (2016), Esquivel (2016), Razavi (2016), Fukuda-Parr (2016), Koehler (2016), Stuart and Woodroffe (2016), Bidegain Ponte and Rodríguez Enríques (2016), Gabizon (2016), Rosche (2016).

  3. ‘…Agenda 2030 combines progressive gender equality targets with targets on women’s economic empowerment which limit themselves to addressing liberal concerns in the existing profoundly unequal global economy. As such, Agenda 2030 has an ambivalent nature from a feminist standpoint’ (Esquivel 2016: 19).

References

  • Bacchi, Carol. 2009. Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidegain Ponte, Nicole, and Corina Rodríguez Enríquez. 2016. Agenda 2030: A bold enough framework towards sustainable, gender-just development? Gender & Development 24 (1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briant Carant, Jane. 2016. Unheard voices: A critical discourse analysis of the millennium development goals, evolution into the sustainable development goals. Third World Quarterly. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01436597.2016.1166944. Accessed August 14, 2016.

  • Civil Society Response to the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development. 2015. Addis Ababa, 16 July.

  • Cornwall, Andrea, and Althea-Maria Rivas. 2015. From “gender equality and women’s empowerment” to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly 36 (2): 396–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denney, J. Michael. 2015. Gender and the sustainable development goals: moving beyond women as a “Quick Fix” for development. In Governance and sustainable issue brief series: Brief 11. Center for Governance and Sustainability. University of Massachusetts Boston.

  • Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel, Valeria. 2016. Power and the sustainable development goals: A feminist analysis. Gender & Development 24 (1): 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel, Valeria, and Caroline Sweetman. 2016. Gender and the sustainable development goals. Gender & Development 24 (1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2016. From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: Shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender & Development 24 (1): 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabizon, Sascha. 2016. Women’s movements’ engagement in the SDGs: Lessons learned from the women’s major group. Gender & Development 24 (1): 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, Stuart, and Sandeep Prasad. 2014. The shifting politics in multilateral development and human rights negotiations and the absence of accountability. Reproductive Health Matters 22 (44): 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Helen, and Anne Schneider. 2005. Deserving and entitled: Social construction and public policy. New York: University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, Gabrielle. 2016. Tapping the sustainable development goals for progressive gender equity and equality policy? Gender & Development 24 (1): 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Manique, Colleen, and Pieter Fourie. 2016a. Gender justice and the MDGs: South Africa and Canada considered. Politikon 43 (1): 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Manique, Colleen and Pieter Fourie. 2016b. ‘Affirming our world: gender justice, social reproduction, and the sustainable development goals’. Development. doi:10.1057/s41301-017-0066-0.

  • Razavi, Shahra. 2016. The 2030 Agenda: Challenges of implementation to attain gender equality and women’s rights. Gender & Development 24 (1): 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, David, and Roger Cobb (eds.). 1995. The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosche, Daniela. 2016. Agenda 2030 and the sustainable development goals: Gender equality at last? An Oxfam perspective. Gender & Development 24 (1): 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, Donald, and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrs, Ann. 2015. A lancet commission on sexual and reproductive health and rights: Going beyond the sustainable development goals. The Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00250-0.

  • Stone, Deborah. 2002. Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Elizabeth, and Jessica Woodroffe. 2016. Leaving no-one behind: can the sustainable development goals succeed where the millennium development goals lacked? Gender & Development 24 (1): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziai, Aram. 2016. Development discourse and global history: From colonialism to the sustainable development goals. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), Canada [Grant Number 55-51431].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Pieter Fourie

  2. Trent University, Peterborough, Canada

    Colleen O’Manique

Authors
  1. Pieter Fourie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Colleen O’Manique
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pieter Fourie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fourie, P., O’Manique, C. ‘It Sells, But It Does Not Fly’: An Early Assessment of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Development 59, 274–279 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0100-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0100-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation