Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Young driver enforcement within graduated driver licensing systems: a scoping review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

Young drivers have the highest crash rates when compared with other groups of drivers. One countermeasure that has successfully reduced these crash rates is graduated driver licensing. However, young drivers’ compliance with graduated driver licensing requirements decreases as they gain driving experience. This paper systematically reviews the literature in order to identify how enforcement practices can be used to influence the compliance of young drivers within graduated driver licensing systems. The review identified 21 relevant studies with all bar one of these being conducted in the USA or Australia. Additionally, young drivers and parents perceive that police enforcement of young drivers within graduated driver licensing systems is inconsistent. As young drivers are more concerned about their parents finding out that they broke the road rules, there appears to be scope for greater parental involvement in this area. The use of P plates or decals for drivers on an intermediate licence may also help to facilitate police enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agent, K., J. Pigman, L. Steenbergen, et al. 2000. Evaluation of the Kentucky graduated driver licensing system. Kentucky: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Reesi, H., A. Al Maniri, K. Plankermann, et al. 2013. Risky driving behavior among university students and staff in the Sultanate of Oman. Accident Analysis and Prevention 58: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, B., and L. Spainhour. 2009. Contributing factors for young at fault drivers in fatal traffic crashes in Florida. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 1: 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S., K. Murphy, and L. Bates. 2017. What drives compliance? The effect of deterrence and shame emotions on young drivers’ compliance with road laws. Policing and Society 27: 884–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Reesi, H., K. Armstrong, J. Edwards, et al. 2015. Social influences on risky driving behaviours among young drivers in Oman. In 2015 Australasian road safety conference. Gold Coast.

  • Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8: 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkworth, J., and K. Murphy. 2015. Procedural justice policing and citizen compliance behaviour: The importance of emotion. Psychology Crime and Law 21: 254–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., S. Allen, and B. Watson. 2016a. The influence of the elements of procedural justice and speed camera enforcement on young novice driver self-reported speeding. Accident Analysis and Prevention 92: 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., M. Darvell, and B. Watson. 2017a. Young and unaffected by road policing strategies: Using deterrence theory to explain provisional drivers’ (non)compliance. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 50: 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., J. Davey, B. Watson, et al. 2014. Factors contributing to young driver crashes: A review. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal 14: 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., A. Filtness, and B. Watson. 2018. Driver education and licensing programs. In Safe mobility: Challenges, methodology and solutions, ed. D. Lord and S. Washington. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A., S. Matthews, G. Simpson, et al. 2016b. Brain injury as the result of violence: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation 15: 305–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., B. Scott-Parker, S. Allen, et al. 2016c. Young driver perceptions of police traffic enforcement and self-reported driving offences. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 39: 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., B. Scott-Parker, M. Darvell, et al. 2017b. Provisional drivers’ perceptions of the impact of displaying P plates. Traffic Injury Prevention 18: 820–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., D. Soole, and B. Watson. 2012. The effectiveness of traffic policing in reducing traffic crashes. In Policing and security in practice: Challenges and achievements, ed. T. Prenzler. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L., B. Watson, and M. King. 2010. Mobility and safety are conflicting goals for transport policy makers when making decisions about graduated driver licensing. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education 48: 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. 1999. Self-reported drink driving and deterrence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 32: 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, D.J., and S. Stephenson. 2003. Graduated driver licensing: the New Zealand experience. Journal of Safety Research 34: 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, D., J. Snortum, R. Homel, et al. 1990. Deterrence and prevention of alcohol-impaired driving in Australia, the United States and Norway. Justice Quarterly 7: 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., K. Hohl, J. Jackson, et al. 2015. Obeying the rules of the road: Procedural justice, social identity, and normative compliance. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 31: 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookland, R., and D.J. Begg. 2011. Adolescent, and their parents, attitudes towards graduated driver licensing and subsequent risky driving and crashes in young adulthood. Journal of Safety Research 42: 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookland, R., D. Begg, J. Langley, et al. 2014. Parental influence on adolescent compliance with Graduated Driver Licensing conditions and crashes as a restricted licensed driver: New Zealand Drivers Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention 69: 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, E.A., S.V. Masten, and K. Browning. 2014. Crash and traffic violation rates before and after licensure for novice California drivers subject to different driver licensing requirements. Journal of Safety Research 50: 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, N., A. Williams, and W. Nissen. 2007. Evaluation and compliance of passenger restrictions in a graduated driver licensing program. Washington: Preusser Research Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N., R. Steinbach, J. Green, et al. 2017. Pathways linking car transport for young adults and the public health in Northern Ireland: A qualitative study to inform the evaluation of graduated driver licensing. BMC Public Health 17: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K., and G. Smith. 2017. An evaluation of the effect of Ohio’s graduated driver licensing law on motor vehicle crashes and crash outcomes involving drivers 16 to 20 years of age. Traffic Injury Prevention 18: 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curcio, A., A. Mak, and A. George. 2017. Predictors of delinquency among adolescents and young adults: A new psychosocial control perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 50: 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., M.R. Elliott, M. Pfeiffer, et al. 2015a. Long-term changes in crash rates after introduction of a graduated driver licensing decal provision. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 48: 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., C. Peek-Asa, C. Hamann, et al. 2015b. Effectiveness of parent-focused interventions to increase teen driver safety: A critical review. Journal of Adolescent Health 57: S6–S14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., M. Pfeiffer, D. Durbin, et al. 2015c. Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase. Accident Analysis and Prevention 80: 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., M. Pfeiffer, and M.R. Elliott. 2017. Compliance with and enforcement of graduated driver licensing restrictions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52: 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., M. Pfeiffer, M.R. Elliott, et al. 2015d. Association between New Jersey’s Graduated Driver Licensing decal provision and crash rates of young drivers with learners’ permits. Injury Prevention 21: 421–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., M. Pfeiffer, R. Localio, et al. 2013. Graduated Driver Licensing Decal Law: Effect on young probationary drivers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, J., and J. Freeman. 2011. Improving road safety through deterrence-based initiatives: A review of research. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal 11: 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePesa, C., T. Raybould, S. Hurwitz, et al. 2017. The impact of the 2007 graduated driver licensing law in Massachusetts on the rate of citations and licensing in teenage drivers. Journal of Safety Research 61: 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvik, R. 2010. Why some road safety problems are more difficult to solve than others. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42: 1089–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eustace, D., and H. Wei. 2010. The role of driver age and gender in motor vehicle fatal crashes. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 2: 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, S. 2010. Teen driver safety. Washington, DC.

  • Freeman, J., E. Szogi, V. Truelove, et al. 2016. The law isn’t everything: The impact of legal and non-legal sanctions on motorists’ drink driving behaviors. Journal of Safety Research 59: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C., I. Lewis, and K. White. 2014. Concealing their communication: Exploring psychosocial predictors of young drivers’ intentions and engagement in concealed texting. Accident Analysis and Prevention 62: 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C., I. Lewis, K. White, et al. 2016. Young drivers’ engagement with social interactive technology on their smartphone: Critical beliefs to target in public education messages. Accident Analysis and Prevention 96: 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A.H., and R. Foss. 2004. Graduated driver licensing restrictions: awareness, compliance, and enforcement in North Carolina. Journal of Safety Research 35: 367–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A.H., J.K. Wells, R. Foss, et al. 2006. Encouraging compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions. Journal of Safety Research 37: 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbeck, E., and A.I. Glendon. 2013. How reinforcement sensitivity and perceived risk influence young drivers’ reported engagement in risky driving behaviors. Accident Analysis and Prevention 54: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbeck, E., A.I. Glendon, and T. Hine. 2017. Reward versus punishment: Reinforcement sensitivity theory, young novice drivers’ perceived risk and risky driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 47: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartos, J.L., K.H. Beck, and B. Simons-Morton. 2004. Parents’ intended limits on adolescents approaching unsupervised driving. Journal of Adolescent Health 19: 591–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartos, J.L., B. Simons-Morton, K.H. Beck, et al. 2005. Parent-imposed limits on high-risk adolescent driving: Are they stricter with graduated driver licensing? Accident Analysis and Prevention 37: 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtenlehner, H., and K. Treiber. 2017. Can situational action theory explain the gender gap in adolescent shoplifting? Results from Austria. International Criminal Justice Review 27: 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, A., R.A. Shults, and G. Bhat. 2016. Parental perceptions of teen driving: Restrictions, worry and influence. Journal of Safety Research 59: 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., D.J. Begg, and S. Palmer. 2013. Reducing young driver crash casualties in Great Britain—Use of routine police crash data to estimate the potential benefits of graduated driver licensing. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 20: 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., G. Simpson, L. Briggs, et al. 2016. Does spirituality facilitate adjustment and resilience among individuals and families after SCI? Journal of Disability and Rehabilitation 38: 921–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kergoat, M., P. Delhomme, and T. Meyer. 2017. Appraisal of speed-enforcement warning messages among young drivers: Influence of automatic versus human speed enforcement in a known or unknown location. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 46: 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloeden, C. 2008. The crash and offence experience of newly licensed young drivers. Sydney: Austroads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, A., L. Bates, D. Belsham, et al. 2016. Third party parental policing of graduated driver licensing in the Australian Capital Territory. Report to the NRMA-ACT Road Safety Trust. Brisbane: CARRS-Q.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levac, D., H. Colquhoun, and K. O’Brien. 2010. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 5: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Evans, B. 2010. Crash involvement during the different phases of the New Zealand Graduated Driver Licensing System (GDLS). Journal of Safety Research 41: 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, S., and B. Bradford. 2015. Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: Results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland. Journal of Experimental Criminology 11: 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, E., B. Lowrey, and D. Johnson. 2017. Evaluating the relative impact of positive and negative encounters with police: A randomized experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology 13: 367–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D., H.M. Simpson, and A. Pak. 2003. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35: 683–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., L. Bates, S. Bennett, et al. 2015. Optimising the length of random breath tests: Results from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 48: 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., S. Bennett, E. Antrobus, et al. 2012. Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology 8: 343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartt, A., N. Oesch, A. Williams, et al. 2013. New Jersey’s license plate decal requirement for graduated driver licenses: Attitudes of parents and teenagers, observed decal use, and citations for teenage driving violations. Traffic Injury Prevention 14: 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F. 2018. Do low levels of confidence suppress the tendency to violate? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 55: 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naz, S., and B. Scott-Parker. 2017. Obstacles to engaging in young driver licensing: Perspectives of parents. Accident Analysis and Prevention 99: 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, F., and R. Paternoster. 2014. Contemporaneous and lagged effects of life domains and substance use: A Test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Journal of Criminology 2014: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouimet, M.C., A. Pradhan, A. Brooks-Russell, et al. 2015. Young drivers and their passengers: A systematic review of epidemiological studies on crash risk. Journal of Adolescent Health 57: S24–S35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., and B. Scott-Parker. 2018. The sex disparity in risky driving: A survey of Colombian young drivers. Traffic Injury Prevention 19: 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., C. Godfrey, H. Khalil, et al. 2015. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Health Care 13: 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J., P. Pearce, L. Ferguson, et al. 2017. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners 29: 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A., and R. Paternoster. 1998. An application of Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence to drinking and driving. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 35: 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, P., M. Johns, G. Golembiewski, et al. 2007. Evaluation of Oregon’s graduated driver licensing program. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, N., K. Pivik, and M. Sutton. 2015. Risky driving among young male drivers: The effects of mood and passengers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 28: 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, R., E. Andrews, P. Harris, et al. 2016. Identifying beliefs underlying pre-drivers’ intentions to take risks: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention 59: 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, N., A. Braga, R. Apel, et al. 2017. The impact of procedurally-just policing on citizen perceptions of police during traffic stops: The Adana randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 33: 701–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, E., K. Murphy, J. Davis, et al. 2012. Legitimacy and policing. In Policing and security in practice: Challenges and achievements, ed. T. Prenzler, 20–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J., and S. Mastrofski. 2005. Police leniency in traffic enforcement encounters: Exploratory findings from observations and interviews. Journal of Criminal Justice 33: 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Parker, B., and O. Oviedo-Trespalacios. 2017. Young driver risky behaviour and predictors of crash risk in Australia, New Zealand and Colombia: Same but different? Accident Analysis and Prevention 99A: 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Parker, B., and K. Rune. 2016. Review of the graduated licensing programs in Australasia. Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety 27: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Parker, B., B. Watson, M. King, et al. 2012. Young, inexperienced and on the road: do novice drivers comply with road rules? Transportation Research Record 2318: 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senserrick, T. 2009. Australian graduated driver licensing systems. Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety 20: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shope, J.T. 2007. Graduated driver licensing: Review of evaluation results since 2002. Journal of Safety Research 38: 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shope, J.T., and C.R. Bingham. 2008. Teen Driving: Motor-Vehicle Crashes and Factors That Contribute. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35: s261–s271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, M., J. Bush, S. Thygerson, et al. 2014. Graduated driver licensing provisions: An analysis of state policies and what works. Traffic Injury Prevention 15: 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, L., P. Kidd, S. Pollak, et al. 2001. Kentucky’s graduated driver licensing program for young drivers: Barriers to effective local implementation. Injury Prevention 7: 286–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O., and C. Patten. 2005. Mobile phones and driving: A review of contemporary research. Cognition, Technology & Work 7: 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watling, C., G. Palk, J. Freeman, et al. 2010. Applying Stafford and Warr’s reconceptualization of deterrence theory to drug driving: Can it predict those likely to offend? Accident Analysis and Prevention 42: 452–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B., V. Siskind, J. Fleiter, et al. 2010. Different approaches to measuring specific deterrence: some examples from speeding offender management. In Australasian road safety research, policing and education conference. Canberra.

  • Webster, J., P. Mazerolle, J. Ransley, et al. 2017. Disrupting domestic ‘ice’ production: Deterring drug runners with a third-party policing intervention. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy 9: 1025–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H., S. Kaplan, and C. Prato. 2014. Analysis of factors associated with injury severity in crashes involving young New Zealand drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 65: 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. 2003. Teenage drivers: Patterns of risk. Journal of Safety Research 34: 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. 2006. Young driver risk factors: Successful and unsuccessful approaches for dealing with them and an agenda for the future. Injury Prevention 12: i4–i8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. 2009. Licensing age and teenage driver crashes: A review of the evidence. Traffic Injury Prevention 10: 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., W.A. Leaf, B. Simons-Morton, et al. 2006. Parents’ views of teen driving risks, the role of parents, and how they plan to manage the risks. Journal of Safety Research 37: 221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., and A. McCartt. 2014. Views of New Jersey teenagers about their state’s policies for beginning drivers. Journal of Safety Research 48: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., A. McCartt, and L. Sims. 2016. History and current status of state graduated driver licensing (GDL) laws in the United States. Journal of Safety Research 59: 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., and D. Preusser. 1997. Night driving restrictions for youthful drivers: A literature review and commentary. Journal of Public Health Policy 18: 334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M., P. Cummings, S. Zhao, et al. 2015. The association of graduated driver licensing with miles driven and fatal crash rates per miles driven among adolescents. Injury Prevention 21: e23–e27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane, QLD, 4122, Australia

    Lyndel Bates

  2. Centre of Accident Research and Road Safety – Queensland (CARRS-Q), Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    Lyndel Bates, David Rodwell & Sarah Matthews

Authors
  1. Lyndel Bates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Rodwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyndel Bates.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bates, L., Rodwell, D. & Matthews, S. Young driver enforcement within graduated driver licensing systems: a scoping review. Crime Prev Community Saf 21, 116–135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-019-00061-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-019-00061-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation