Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extinguishing a Fictional Fire: Responding to Emotional and Misinformed Audiences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Along with their benefits, social media platforms can present reputational challenges for organizations, including a channel to breed visible, online reputational threats known as paracrises. In 2018, an emotional television episode of This Is Us sparked social media chatter surrounding the popular slow cooker Crock-Pot. Distraught viewers angrily inundated social media with unfounded fears, proclaimed the appliances were unsafe, and vowed to discard them, circulating inaccurate information and creating a hybrid angry customer and misinformation paracrisis for the brand. Crock-Pot quickly transformed the threat into a public relations success and brand-building opportunity by using emotionally-driven messages, modified crisis response strategies, and strategic alliances. This study illustrates the limitations of current paracrisis response strategies for responding to misinformation and emotional audiences and demonstrates that adapting classic crisis responses (i.e., situational crisis communication theory) can be a more effective approach. The findings offer recommendations for how managers can adapt classic crisis responses and integrate communication style elements, including human voice and humor, to manage angry customers and misinformation paracrises effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Akel, A., A. Spitz, and R. West. 2021. The effect of spokesperson attribution on public health message sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 16 (2): E0245100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, L., B.F. Liu, and Y. Jin. 2012. How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research 40 (2): 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte, K.J., D.R. Bernard, and H.D. O’Hair. 2009. Knowing terror: On the epistemology and rhetoric of risk. In Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, ed. R.L. Heath and H.D. O’Hair, 607–628. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogomoletc, E. 2019. Dialogic communication in faux pas paracrises. What do users want to discuss on brands’ official Facebook pages? Journal of Promotional Communications 7 (1): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciolli, J. 2018. The maker of Crock-Pot is plunging as people freak out over a character’s shocking death on ‘This Is Us’. Business Insider, 25 January.

  • Claeys, A.-S., V. Cauberghe, and P. Vyncke. 2010. Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review 36: 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman-Lochner, L. 2018. Crock-Pot owner defends product after ‘This Is Us’ PR nightmare. Bloomberg, 25 January.

  • Coombs, W.T. 2007. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10 (3): 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T. 2014. State of crisis communication: Evidence and the bleeding edge. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations 1(1): 1–12. https://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/CoombsFinalWES.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2020.

  • Coombs, W.T. 2018. Revisiting situational crisis communication theory: The influences of social media on crisis communication theory and practice. In Social media and crisis communication, ed. L. Austin, and Y. Jin, 21–38. New York: Routledge.

  • Coombs, W.T. 2019. Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T. 2020. Situational crisis communication theory: Influences, provenance, evolution, and prospects. In Crisis Communication, ed. F. Frandsen and W. Johansen, 121–140. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2001. An extended examination of the crisis situation: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research 13 (4): 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1304_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2002. Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly 16: 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2012. Amazon.com’s Orwellian nightmare: Exploring apology in an online environment. Journal of Communication Management 16 (3): 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2012b. The paracrisis: The challenges presented by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review 38 (3): 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., and S.J. Holladay. 2016. Digital naturals and crisis communication: Significant shifts of focus. In Strategic Communication, Social Media, and Democracy: The Challenge of the Digital Naturals, ed. W.T. Coombs, J. Falkheimer, M. Heide, and P. Young, 54–62. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T., S.J. Holladay, and R. White. 2021. Corporate crises: Sticky crises and corporations. In Advancing Crisis Communication Effectiveness: Integrating Public Relations Scholarship with Practice, ed. Y. Jin, B.H. Reber, and G.J. Nowak, 35–62. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crock-Pot. 2018. PRSA Award Submission. Provided via email 9 January 2019.

  • Damayanti, R., S. Rodrigues, S. Chua, and A. Pang. 2018. The corporate social media spokesperson: Who should speak on behalf of the organization in times of crisis? In Social Media and Crisis Communication, ed. L. Austin and Y. Jin, 99–113. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman. 2018a. Crock-Pot killed Jack. Client work. https://www.edelman.com/work/newell-brands-crock-pot-killed-jack. Accessed 15 October 2018.

  • Edelman. 2018b. 20 years of trust. https://www.edelman.com/20yearsoftrust. Accessed 20 December 2020.

  • Einwiller, S.A., and S. Steilen. 2015. Handling complaints on social network sites—An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review 41 (2): 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etter, M., P. Winkler, and T. Pleil. 2021. Public relations and social media. In Public Relations, ed. C. Valentini, 159–174. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, K.A. 2019. Death of the slow-cooker or #CROCKPOTISINNOCENT? This Is Us, parasocial grief, and the Crock-Pot crisis. Journal of Communication Inquiry 44 (1): 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919826534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. 2018. Starbucks closes after fake, racially loaded post goes viral. Patch, 9 January.

  • Hafner, J. 2018. Total crock? Death via slow cooker like on ‘This Is Us’ remains unlikely. USA Today, 6 February.

  • Halder, D., D. Pradhan, and H.R. Chaudhuri. 2021. Forty-five years of celebrity credibility and endorsement literature: Review and learnings. Journal of Business Research 125: 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures 1: 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holladay, S.J. 2010. Are they practicing what we are preaching? An investigation of crisis communication strategies in the media coverage of chemical accidents. In The Handbook of Crisis Communication, ed. W.T. Coombs and S.J. Holladay, 159–180. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Honisch, S.V., and L.M. Manchón. 2019. The effects of paracrisis origin and response strategy on Facebook audience’s perceived organizational reputation and behavioural intentions. Corporate Reputation Review 23: 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00070-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javornik, A., R. Filieri, and R. Gumann. 2020. “Don’t forget that others are watching, too!” The effect of conversational human voice and reply length on observers’ perceptions of complaint handling on social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing 50: 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., and B.F. Liu. 2010. The blog-mediated crisis communication model: Recommendations for responding to influential external blogs. Journal of Public Relations Research 22: 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003801420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joest, M. 2018. This Is Us’ Crock-Pot cliffhanger earned the show some of its best ratings yet. Cinema Blend, 30 January.

  • Kelleher, T. 2009. Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication 59: 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01410.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.M. 2016. Social Media Campaigns: Strategies for Public Relations and Marketing. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and Y. Jin. 2016. Understanding emotionally involved publics: The effect of crisis type and felt involvement on publics’ emotional responses to different consumer product crises. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 21 (4): 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2015-0064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., X.A. Zhang, and B.W. Xhang. 2016. Self-mocking crisis strategy on social media: Focusing on Alibaba chairman Jack Ma in China. Public Relations Review 42 (5): 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krystal, B. 2018. Crock-Pot tells ‘This Is Us’ fans: Our slow cookers won’t kill you. The Washington Post, 24 January.

  • Lambret, C.V., and E. Barki. 2018. Social media crisis management: Aligning corporate response strategies with stakeholders’ emotions online. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 26 (2): 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J.S. 2017. How a paracrisis situation is instigated by an online firestorm and visual mockery: Testing a paracrisis development model. Computers in Human Behavior 67: 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.F. 2010. Effective public relations in racially charged crises: Not black or white. In The Handbook of Crisis Communication, ed. W.T. Coombs and S.J. Holladay, 335–358. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.F., Y. Jin, L. Austin, E. Kuligowski, and C.E. Young. 2021. The social-mediated crisis communication (SMCC) model: Identifying the next frontier. In Advancing Crisis Communication Effectiveness: Integrating Public Relations Scholarship with Practice, ed. Y. Jin, B.H. Reber, and G.J. Nowak, 214–230. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C.C. Bracken. 2002. Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28 (4): 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., and Y.-H.C. Huang. 2018. Getting emotional: An emotion-cognition dual-factor model of crisis communication. Public Relations Review 44 (1): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R.L. 2016. Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication 31 (7): 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, L., and P. Theunissen. 2015. Reputations at risk: Engagement during social media crises. Public Relations Review 41 (1): 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallotta, F., and Horowitz, J. 2018. Crock-Pot is in hot water over ‘This Is Us’ plot twist. CNN Business, 25 January.

  • Pang, A., N.B.B.A. Hassan, and A.C.Y. Chong. 2014. Negotiating crisis in the social media environment: Evolution of crises online, gaining credibility offline. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 19 (1): 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2012-0064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., and G.T. Cameron. 2014. Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 9 (3): 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014538827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluative methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popken, B. 2018. Crock-Pot twist on ‘This Is Us’ has brand in bad company. NBC News, 24 January.

  • Rice, L. 2018. The top 50 most-watched shows of the 2017–18 season. Entertainment Weekly, 31 May.

  • Roh, S. 2017. Examining the paracrisis online: The effects of message source, response strategies and social vigilantism on public responses. Public Relations Review 42 (3): 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J., and A.N. Smith. 2019. Branding in the age of social media firestorms: How to create brand value by fighting back online. Journal of Marketing Management 35 (11–12): 1100–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1620839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selaković, M., N. Ljepava, and M. Mateev. 2020. Implications of the paracrises on the companies’ stock prices. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 25 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2019-0080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellnow, T.L., R.R. Ulmer, M.W. Seeger, and R.S. Littlefield. 2009. Effective Risk Communication: A Message-Centered Approach. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., and E. Peters. 2006. Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (6): 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, S., and L. Dang-Xuan. 2013. Emotions and information diffusion in social media: Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems 29: 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, K.D., and E. Metzgar. 2007. Communicating during crisis: Use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relations Review 33: 340–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veil, S.R., T. Buehner, and M.J. Palenchar. 2011. A work-in-progress literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 19 (2): 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veil, S.R., E.L. Petrun, and H.A. Roberts. 2012. Issue management gone awry: When not to respond to an online reputation threat. Corporate Reputation Review 15 (4): 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2012.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. 1986. An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, J. 2018. How Crock-Pot smoothly navigated a brand disaster. AdAge, 10 May.

  • Yang, S.-U., M. Kang, and P. Johnson. 2010. Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication Research 37 (4): 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, S.L., A. Pang, M. Cheong, and J.Q. Yeo. 2020. Emotions in social media: An analysis of tweet responses to MH370 search suspension announcement. International Journal of Business Communication 57 (2): 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419882755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 110 Shanks Hall (0443), 181 Turner Street NW, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Chelsea L. Woods

Authors
  1. Chelsea L. Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsea L. Woods.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woods, C.L. Extinguishing a Fictional Fire: Responding to Emotional and Misinformed Audiences. Corp Reputation Rev 25, 239–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00125-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00125-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation