Skip to main content
Log in

How a Corporate Influencer Co-creates Brand Meaning: The Case of Pawel Dillinger from Deutsche Telekom

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the internal anchorage of a brand constitutes an important building block of the brand management discipline. Considering this, the increasing importance of a positive overall brand experience along all brand touch points has resulted in a parallel increase in the importance of how employees can live the brand. Corporate influencers, an area of study that is to date underresearched, could be a vehicle to authentically bring a brand’s identity closer not only to customers but also to employees. Therefore, our research focuses on the question of how a corporate influencer expresses the positioning of a corporate brand to internal audiences. To gain a deeper understanding of the instruments and tactics of an impactful corporate influencer, we chose an in-depth case study approach. We selected Pawel Dillinger, an informal corporate influencer of the German telecommunication brand Deutsche Telekom, and deeply analyzed his use of an internal social media platform to promote the corporate brand. Our research presents content categories and communication styles, underpins the role of authenticity in internal brand management, and illustrates how a brand ambassador contributes to the enacting of the values of a corporate brand. We do so by offering seven propositions characterizing the communication habits of a corporate influencer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashforth, B.E., and F. Mael. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASMC. 2019. Corporate Influencer. The power of employees communicating for their organizations. Communication Snapshots, June 2019.

  • Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. and Watts, D. J. 2011. Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, ACM, 65–74.

  • Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentince-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M., and B.J. Avolio. 1993. Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly 17: 112–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarth, C., and M. Schmidt. 2010. How strong is the business-to-business brand in the workforce? An empirically-tested model of ‘internal brand equity’ in a business-to-business setting. Industrial Marketing Management 39 (8): 1250–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekhet, A.K., and J.A. Zauszniewski. 2012. Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data. Nurse Researcher 20 (2): 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. 2018. Brand management: Co-Creating meaningful brands. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudana, S., and E. Segev. 2017. Theorizing provocation narratives as communication strategies. Communication Theory 27 (4): 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, E., M. Kavaratzis, and S. Zenker. 2013. My city–my brand. The different roles of residents in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development 6 (1): 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brexendorf, T., and K. Keller. 2017. Leveraging the corporate brand: The importance of corporate brand innovativeness and brand architecture. European Journal of Marketing 51 (9/10): 1530–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmann, C., M. Jost-Benz, and N. Riley. 2009. Towards an identity-based brand equity model. Journal of Business Research 62 (3): 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmann, C., and S. Zeplin. 2005. Building brand commitment: A behavioural approach to internal brand management. The Journal of Brand Management 12 (4): 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Causon, J. 2004. The internal brand. Successful cultural change and employee empowerment. Journal of Change Management 4 (4): 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R.B. 1993. Influence: The psychology of persuasion, 3rd ed. New York: Quill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five designs. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., and J. Van Den Bergh. 1996. The communication effects of provocation in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising 15 (3): 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessart, L. 2018. Do ads that tell a story always perform better? The role of character identification and character type in storytelling ads. International Journal of Research in Marketing 35 (2): 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doss, S.K. 2014. Spreading the good word. Toward an understanding of brand evangelism. Journal of Management and Marketing Research 14 (1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss, S.K., and D.S. Carstens. 2014. Big five personality traits and brand evangelism. International Journal of Marketing Studies 6 (3): 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. 2011. How humor in advertising works: A meta-analytic test of alternative models. Marketing Letters 22 (2): 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feick, L.F., and L.L. Price. 1987. The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing 51 (1): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-Buttinger, C., and C. Vallaster. 2008. Brand ambassadors. Strategic diplomats or tactical promoters? In Marketing metaphors and metamorphosis, ed. P.J. Kitchen, 132–145. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. and A. L. Hamilton. 2012. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organization Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31.

  • Gibson, D.E. 2004. Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior 65 (1): 134–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. 2017. Relationship marketing and service: An update. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 27 (3): 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., and F.V. Wangenheim. 2018. The big four of influencer marketing. A typology of influencers. Marketing Review St. Gallen 2: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational and Technology Journal 29 (2): 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz. 2010. Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance. Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R.H. 1993. Interpersonal attraction in the absence of explicit attitudinal information. Social Cognition 11: 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur, W.M., K.H. Ahn, and M. Kim. 2011. Building brand loyalty through managing brand community commitment. Management Decision 49 (7): 1194–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, O., N. Ind, and M. Alfaro. 2017. The organic view of the brand. A brand value co-creation model. In Advances in corporate branding, ed. J.M. Balmer, S.M. Powell, J. Kernstock, and T. Brexendorf, 148–174. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. 2007. Living the brand: How to transform every member of your organization into a brand champion. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N. 2014. Living the brand. In The definitive book of branding, ed. K. Kompella, 199–216. Indoa: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N., and H.J. Schmidt. 2019. Co-creating brands: Brand management from a co-creative cerspective. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, B., and W. Kunz. 2012. How to transform consumers into fans of your brand. Journal of Service Management 23 (3): 344–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H.R., S.M.C. Loureiro, and A. Manarioti. 2016. Exploring behavioural branding, brand love and brand co-creation. Journal of Product & Brand Management 25 (6): 516–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. 1999. Brand mantras. Rationale, criteria and examples. Journal of Marketing Management 15 (1–3): 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, C., D. Grace, and S. Weaven. 2013. Developing brand champions. A franchisee perspective. Journal of Marketing Management 29 (11–12): 1308–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koiso-Kanttila, N. 2004. Digital content marketing: A literature synthesis. Journal of Marketing Management 20 (1–2): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löhndorf, B., and A. Diamantopoulos. 2014. Internal branding. Social identity and social exchange perspectives on turning employees into brand champions. Journal of Service Research 17 (3): 310–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrilees, B. 2016. Internal branding. Dissecting, re-analysing and re-directing the literature. In The Rotledge companion to contemporary brand management, ed. F. Dallolmo Riley, J. Singh, and C. Blankson, 356–369. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morhart, F.M., W. Herzog, and T. Tomczak. 2009. Brand-specific leadership: Turning employees into brand champions. Journal of Marketing 73 (5): 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrick, N.R. 2000. Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patriotta, G. 2003. Sensemaking on the shop floor: Narratives of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Management Studies 40 (2): 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pera, R., N. Occhiocupo, and J. Clarke. 2016. Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Research 69 (10): 4033–4041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.D., and M.A. Zimmerman. 1995. Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology 23 (5): 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. 1998. Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing 32 (9/10): 785–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piehler, R., D. Grace, and C. Burmann. 2018. Internal brand management. Introduction to the special issue and directions for future research. Journal of Brand Management 25 (3): 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F. 2009. It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. 2008. Understanding digital content marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 24 (5–6): 517–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem, F., and O. Iglesias. 2016. Mapping the domain of the fragmented field of internal branding. Journal of Product & Brand Management 25 (1): 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, R.F., J.S. Adams, S.S. Carley, and F.A. Wiebe. 1989. Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13 (3): 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.J., and C. Baumgarth. 2018. Strengthening internal brand equity with brand ambassador programs. Development and testing of a success factor model. Journal of Brand Management 25 (3): 250–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selfhout, M., J. Denissen, S. Branje, and W. Meeus. 2009. In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (6): 1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., and T.J. Kamalanabhan. 2012. Internal corporate communication and its impact on internal branding: Perception of Indian public sector employees. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 17 (3): 300–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J.N., and R.S. Sisodia. 2015. Does marketing need reform? Fresh perspectives on the future. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J.E., and P.J. Burke. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63: 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research, vol. 5. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swap, W., D. Leonard, M. Shields, and L. Abrams. 2001. Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1): 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, K., L. de Chernatony, L. Arganbright, and S. Khan. 1999. The buy-in benchmark. How staff understanding and commitment impact brand and business performance. Journal of Marketing Management 15 (8): 819–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallaster, C., and S. von Wallpach. 2013. An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation. Journal of Business Research 66 (9): 1505–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, M.G., and C.S. Gulas. 1992. The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising 21 (4): 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L., C. King, and R. Piehler. 2013. That’s not my job: Exploring the employee perspective in the development of brand ambassadors. International Journal of Hospitality Management 35: 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakimova, R., F. Mavondo, S. Freeman, and H. Stuart. 2017. Brand champion behaviour. Its role in corporate branding. Journal of Brand Management 24 (6): 575–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 1981. The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (1): 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Y. Jiang, R. Shabbir, and M. Du. 2015. Building industrial brand equity by leveraging firm capabilities and co-creating value with customers. Industrial Marketing Management 51: 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M.A. 2000. Empowerment theory. In Handbook of community psychology, ed. J. Rappaport and E. Seidman, 43–63. Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers. Their comments and advice were extremely helpful. We would also like to thank the interviewees and in particular Pawel Dillinger for his willingness to support our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Hesse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author (Andreas Hesse) states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hesse, A., Schmidt, H.J. & Baumgarth, C. How a Corporate Influencer Co-creates Brand Meaning: The Case of Pawel Dillinger from Deutsche Telekom. Corp Reputation Rev 24, 191–204 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00103-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00103-3

Keywords

Navigation