Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Responses to Critical Journalistic Interview Requests: An Experimental Study on Crisis Prevention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Journalists sometimes uncover deficiencies, abuses, and mistakes made by companies. As part of their professional duty, journalists usually give companies the opportunity to tell their side of the story; thus, a company has the chance to mitigate an oncoming crisis. The present study tests this idea using the example of a television report about the sugar content of baby food. We vary the company’s applied strategies (primary as well as secondary strategies) and the presentation form (written versus presented by a spokesperson in front of the camera). Our findings show that attacks against journalists are perceived rather negatively, while apologies and justifications are more convincing. Perceptions of the company are also improved when a statement is presented by a spokesperson rather than simply presented in writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora Denner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koch, T., Denner, N., Viererbl, B. et al. Corporate Responses to Critical Journalistic Interview Requests: An Experimental Study on Crisis Prevention. Corp Reputation Rev 22, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0054-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0054-7

Keywords

Navigation