Skip to main content
Log in

Poverty reduction through entrepreneurship: incentives, social networks, and sustainability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on poverty reduction through entrepreneurship has often emphasized external help from government or charitable institutions. Evidence from China is used to argue that poverty reduction through entrepreneurship is an internal process which helps the poor to undertake positive actions to reduce their poverty. To conventional analyses emphasizing endogeneity and sustainability, social networks rooted in nostalgia are proposed as another determinant of the success of entrepreneurial poverty reduction initiatives. That expanded theoretical framework provides a refined and deeper understanding of how poverty reduction through entrepreneurship succeeds or fails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source Adapted from Webb and Sirmon (2009)

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Strom, R. (2006). Entrepreneurship, growth and public policy, 1st edition: (309–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., & Hanna, R. (2012). Targeting the poor: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, T. H., Mckenny, A. F., & Short, J. C. (2013). The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on micro lending investment: An examination of the warm-glow effect. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 690–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., & Harris, C. J. (1994). Choosing a welfare indicator. American Economic Review, 84(2), 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E. (2006). Three avenues for social entrepreneurship research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2012). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 47(3), 370–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J. L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs’ social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boso, N., Story, V. M., & Cadogan, J. W. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(6), 708–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Si, S. (2014). Entrepreneurship, poverty, and Asia: Moving beyond subsistence entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ketchen, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2013). Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 683–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Khavul, S., & Chavez, H. (2011). Micro lending in emerging economies: Building a new line of inquiry from the ground up. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 718–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2014). Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation & Development, 4(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission, P. (2013). Press note on poverty estimates, 2011–12. Working paper.

  • Corporate author. (2016). Zhejiang statistics yearbook.

  • Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2014). Innovation in informal settings: Reflections and proposals for a research agenda. Innovation & Development, 4(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Mcgahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2004). How legacy firms can introduce radical and disruptive innovations: Theoretical and empirical analyses. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, A1–A6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, M., & Wei, Z. (2015). Studies on the relationship between innovation inclusiveness, dual innovation and market performance in the context of China’s transition. Research and Development Management, 27(6), 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: A recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 785–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. G. (1998). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(2), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, K. J. (2014). Exploring exclusion in innovation systems: Case of plantation agriculture in India. Innovation & Development, 4(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S. R. (2005). Microfinance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G. M., Webb, J. W., Sutter, C. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2011). Microfranchising in Base-of-the-Pyramid markets: Institutional challenges and adaptations to the franchise model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(3), 503–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P. F., Pradhan, M. P., Saadah, F. (2001). Poverty, education, and health in Indonesia: Who benefits from public spending? Policy Research Working Paper 64.

  • Liang, Q., Zou, L., Yang, X., Kong, B. (2016). Research on mechanism of government support on inclusive entrepreneurship: Case study of Jieyang Junpu rural e-commerce entrepreneurial cluster. South China Journal of Economics.

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyara, G., & Jones, E. (2007). Community-based tourism enterprises development in Kenya: An exploration of their potential as avenues of poverty reduction. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(6), 628–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, A. (2002). Microfinance and poverty reduction: The problematic experience of communal banking in Peru. Working paper.

  • Mcmullen, J. S. (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market-based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(1), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. W. H. (2005). Great expectations: Microfinance and poverty reduction in Asia and Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 33(3–4), 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J., Wagner, R. F., Haley, B. (2002). Analysis of the effects of microfinance on poverty reduction. NYU Wagner working paper.

  • Mosley, P., & Hulme, D. (1998). Microenterprise finance: Is there a conflict between growth and poverty alleviation? World Development, 26(5), 783–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. 2000. Can anyone hear us? Voices of the poor.

  • Narayan, D., Patel, R., & Schafft, K. (1999). Can anyone hear us? Voices from 47 countries. Washington, DC: Poverty Group, PREM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navajas, S., Schreiner, M., & Meyer, R. L. (1998). Microcredit and the poorest of the poor: Theory and evidence from Bolivia. Economics & Sociology Occasional Papers, 28(2), 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. L. (2005). Organizational scholarship and the eradication of global poverty. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 970–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2010). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 1(2), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakumar, R. (2002). Micro-credit and rural poverty: An analysis of empirical evidence. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(10), 955–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., & Huang, G. (2016). Constructing inclusive entrepreneurship system including key entrepreneurial factors: Analysis from government. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 33(11), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V., Barry, D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2009). Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L., Dolan, C., Johnstone-Louis, M., Sugden, K., & Wu, M. (2012). Enterprise and inequality: A study of Avon in South Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(3), 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Economics, 50(1), 200–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, G. E. (2016). Inclusive entrepreneurship: A process for improving self-employment for people with disabilities. Journal of Policy Practice, 15(1–2), 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si, S., Yu, X., & Wu, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship and poverty reduction: A case study of Yiwu, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si, X., Zhong, X., Luo, H., & Chen, H. (2017). How to reduce poverty through entrepreneurship: Theory and practice modes. R&D Management, 29(6), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ven, A. H. V. D., Sapienza, H. J., & Villanueva, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial pursuits of self- and collective interests. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., & Sirmon, D. G. (2009). You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 34(3), 492–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner, K. L., Rosa, J. A., & Viswanathan, M. (2010). Marketing to subsistence consumers: Lessons from practice. Journal of Business Research, 63(6), 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Si, S., & Wu, X. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and innovation: Informal debt as an empirical case. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(3), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, Y., Xu, L., & Wang, T. (2017). Study on the path of inclusive innovation to promote regional economic growth based on the perspective of transcending the middle income trap. Research and Development Management, 29(1), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., & Wu, X. (2013). Microscopic mechanism and opportunities for inclusive growth source: Source and the understanding of the metal. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 30(9), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71728003), Macao Foundation (No. MF1711), and University of Macau MYRG (No. MYRG 2016-00207-FBA) for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Si, S. Poverty reduction through entrepreneurship: incentives, social networks, and sustainability. Asian Bus Manage 17, 243–259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0039-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0039-5

Keywords

Navigation