Abstract
Building density is an important factor affecting both urban morphology and urban habitat. Recently, “compact cities” with high density have become the main trend in urban sustainable development. Yet, how to promote effectively high-density city construction through spatial measures remains a challenge. This paper investigates the central urban zones of high-density cities in Asia. The construction scale and block size of 29 central zones in 17 international cities were quantitatively studied to compare their respective relationships with building density; other related factors were also considered (geographical features and urban nature). No direct correlation between construction scale and building density was found. However, a block’s size was strongly correlated with its building density. In general, smaller block size was associated with a higher building density. Based on the results, we conclude that simply compressing scale will not effectively improve building density. Instead, the development of a small-size block may promote high-density spatial construction, thereby, facilitating the realization of compact cities and sustainable urban development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, E.R. 1993. Density measures: A review and analysis. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 10 (3): 181–202.
Auclair, C. 1997. The UNCHS (Habitat) indicators program. Scope-Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment International Council of Scientific Unions 58: 288–292.
Bardhan, R., K. Kurisu, and K. Hanaki. 2015. Does compact urban forms relate to good quality of life in high density cities of India? Case of Kolkata. Cities 48: 55–65.
Beijing Municipal Commission of Planning and Natural Resources (BJMCPNR). 2017. Land bidding and auction project report. http://ghzrzyw.beijing.gov.cn/. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.
Berghauser Pont, M. and Haupt, P. 2010. Spacematrix. Space, Density and Urban Form. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers
Centaline Property. 2017. Statistical report on land transfer price, http://hk.centanet.com/home/index.aspx. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
Charney, I. 2010. Property developers and the robust downtown: The case of four major Canadian downtowns. Canadian Geographer 49 (3): 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2005.00097.x.
Cheng, V. 2009. Understanding density and high density. In Designing high-density cities, 37–51. London: Routledge.
Churchman, A. 1999. Disentangling the concept of density. Journal of Planning Literature 13 (4): 389–411.
Clauretie, T.M., and H. Li. 2019. Land values: Size matters. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 58 (1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-017-9628-x.
Douglass, M., and L. Huang. 2007. Globalizing the city in Southeast Asia: Utopia on the urban edge–the case of Phu My Hung, Saigon. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 3 (2): 1–42.
Dovey, K., and E. Pafka. 2013. The urban density assemblage: Modelling multiple measures. Urban Design International. 19 (1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.13.
Edwards, N. 2010. The Sydney business frontier 1856–92: A building stock approach. Geographical Research 19 (1): 78–98.
Ellis, J.G. 2004. Explaining residential density. Places 16 (2): 34–43.
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (3): 265–294.
Ewing, R.H., and S. Hamidi. 2014. Measuring sprawl 2014. New York: Smart Growth America.
Forsyth, A. 2003. Measuring density: Working definitions for residential density and building intensity. Design Brief 9 (1): 2–8.
Gaigné, C., S. Riou, and J.F. Thisse. 2012. Are compact cities environmentally friendly? Journal of Urban Economics 72 (2–3): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2012.04.001.
Globalization and World Cities Research Network (GaWC). 2016. The world according to 2016, http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2016t.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
Gluszak, M., and R. Zygmunt. 2018. Development density, administrative decisions, and land values: An empirical investigation. Land Use Policy 70: 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.036.
Guan, C., and P.G. Rowe. 2016. The concept of urban intensity and China’s townization policy: Cases from Zhejiang Province. Cities 55: 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.012.
Ho, C.W., and L.L. Sim. 2010. The characteristics and locational patterns of wholesale and service trades in the central area of Singapore. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 1 (1): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.1980.tb00099.x.
Hu, L. 2011. A study on diagrammatic assessment approaches to the sustainable morphology of urban density. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO), https://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/194624. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
Hua, J., X. Zhang, C. Ren, Y. Shi, and T.-C. Lee. 2021. Spatiotemporal assessment of extreme heat risk for high-density cities: A case study of Hong Kong from 2006 to 2016. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102507.
Huang, J., X.X. Lu, and J.M. Sellers. 2007. A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landscape and Urban Planning 82 (4): 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.010.
Jabareen, Y.R. 2006. Sustainable urban form: Their typologies, models and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: 38–52.
Jenks, M., E. Burton, K. Williams, and M. Symes. 1997. The Compact City: A sustainable urban form? Land Use Policy 14 (3): 215.
Karakiewicz, J., B. Shelton, and T. Kvan. 2013. The making of Hong Kong: From vertical to volumetric. New York: Routledge.
Kumar, R. 2017. FAR, density and impact on urban morphology. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 4 (4): 1301–1306.
Lehmann, S. 2016. Sustainable urbanism: Towards a framework for quality and optimal density? Future Cities and Environment 2 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40984-016-0021-3.
Leung, S.M.S., T.W. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2017. Linked podiums affecting street life: A case of tuen mun in Hong Kong. Urban Design International 22 (1): 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0008-6.
Martin, L., and L. March. 1972. Urban space and structures. Cambridge University Press.
Millward, H., and L. Winsor. 2010. Twentieth-century retail change in the Halifax central business district. Canadian Geographer 41 (2): 194–201.
Murakami, A., A.M. Zain, K. Takeuchi, A. Tsunekawa, and S. Yokota. 2005. Trends in urbanization and patterns of land use in the Asian mega cities Jakarta, Bangkok, and Metro Manila. Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (3): 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.021.
Murphy, R.E., and J.E. Vance. 1954. Delimiting the CBD. Economic Geography 30 (3): 189–222.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2011. China Urban Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Ng, E. and Wong, K.S. 2003. Efficiency & livability: Towards sustainable habitation in Hong Kong, in International housing conference in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Housing Authority.
Pei, Y.X., Z.C. Shan, L. Yong, and H.G. Chen. 2000. Functional features and spatial structure of CBDs in Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica 4: 475–486. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2000.04.010.
Peiser, R.B. 1989. Density and urban sprawl. Land Economics 65 (3): 193–204.
Rapoport, A. 1975. Toward a redefinition of density. Environment and Behavior 7 (2): 133–158
Resch, E., R.A. Bohne, T. Kvamsdal, and J. Lohne. 2016 Impact of urban density and building height on energy use in cities. Energy Procedia 96: 800–814.
Schwarz, N. 2010. Urban form revisited—Selecting indicators for characterising European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 96 (1): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.007.
Shi, B., and J. Yang. 2015. Scale, distribution, and pattern of mixed land use in central districts: A case study of Nanjing, China. Habitat International 46: 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.008.
Song, J., B. Huang, J.S. Kim, J. Wen, and R. Li. 2020. Fine-scale mapping of an evidence-based heat health risk index for high-density cities: Hong Kong as a case study. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137226.
Sullivan, B., and K. Chen. 1997. Design for tenant fitout: A critical review of public housing flat design in Hong Kong. Habitat International 21 (3): 291–303.
Tan, Z., and C.Q. Xue. 2014. Walking as a planned activity: Elevated pedestrian network and urban design regulation in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Design 19 (5): 722–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.946895.
TOMTOM Traffic Index. 2019. The world according to traffic, http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/traffic-index/. Accessed 8 June 2019.
Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA). 2003. TCPA Policy Statement: Residential Densities, https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/43295384/download-the-tcpa-policy-statement-on-residential-densities. Accessed 10 Mar 2019.
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). 2015. The state of world population. In: World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. United Nations Population Division, New York.
Xue, C.Q. 2016. Hong Kong architecture 1945–2015: from colonial to global. Singapore: Springer.
Xue, C.Q.L., H. Zhai, and J. Roberts. 2010. An urban island floating on the MTR station: A case study of the west Kowloon development in Hong Kong. Urban Design International 15 (4): 191–207.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the Priority Academic Development Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (1101007003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51608252), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20160628).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, J., Shi, B. Scale or size? An analysis of the factors that affect building density: evidence from high-density central urban zones in Asia. Urban Des Int 26, 220–233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00165-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00165-7