Skip to main content
Log in

A retrospective on Culture’s Consequences: The 35-year journey

  • Retrospective
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our 2006 Journal of International Business Studies article, “A Quarter Century of Culture’s Consequences: A Review of the Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Cultural Values Framework,” provided a comprehensive review of 180 empirical journal articles and edited volume chapters published between 1980 and June 2002 that incorporated Hofstede’s cross-cultural values framework. We examined empirical research that positioned culture as either a main or moderating effect. The review attempted to make sense of the almost quarter century of research examining the impact of culture at the individual, group/organization, and country levels. In the present commentary, we provide: (a) a summary of the progress that has been made in the intervening decade, and most importantly, (b) a new set of recommendations for the next decade to guide those wishing to study the role of national culture in organizations.

Résumé

Notre article de 2006 publié dans Journal of International Business Studies, “A Quarter Century of Culture’s Consequences: A Review of the Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Cultural Values Framework,” a proposé une analyse complète de 180 articles de revues et chapitres d’ouvrages collectifs empiriques publiés entre 1980 et juin 2002 qui ont intégré le cadre théorique des valeurs cross-culturelles de Hofstede. Nous avons examiné les recherches empiriques qui considéraient la culture comme un effet principal ou modéré. L’analyse visait à donner du sens à la recherche de près d’un quart de siècle, étudiant l’impact de la culture aux niveaux individuel, des groupes/organisationnel et des pays. Dans le présent commentaire, nous livrons : (a) une synthèse du progrès qui a été réalisé durant la période d’étude et, de manière plus importante, (b) un nouvel ensemble de recommandations pour la prochaine décennie afin de guider ceux qui souhaitent étudier le rôle de la culture nationale dans les organisations.

Resumen

Nuestro artículo del 2006 en el Journal of International Business Studies,Un cuarto de siglo de las Consecuencias de la Cultura: Una revisión de la Investigación Empírica Incorporado el Marco de Valores Culturales de Hofstede” proporcionó una revisión exhaustiva de 180 artículos empíricos y capítulos en volúmenes editados publicados entre 1980 y junio del 2002 que incorporaban el marco de valores culturales. Examinamos la investigación empírica que sitúo la cultural ya sea como efecto principal o moderador. La revisión intentó dar sentido del casi cuarto de siglo de investigación examinando el impacto de la cultura en los niveles individual, grupo/organización, y país. En este presente comentario, damos: (a) un resumen del progreso que se ha hecho una década después, y lo más importante, (b) un nuevo conjunto de recomendaciones para la próxima década para guiar a quienes deseen estudiar el rol de la cultura nacional en las organizaciones.

Resumo

Nosso artigo de 2006 do Journal of International Business Studies intitulado, “A Quarter Century of Culture’s Consequences: A Review of the Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Cultural Values Framework” forneceu uma revisão abrangente de 180 artigos científicos empíricos e capítulos editados publicados entre 1980 e Junho de 2002, que incorporaram a estrutura de valores interculturais de Hofstede. Nós examinamos a pesquisa empírica que posicionou cultura como o efeito principal ou moderador. A revisão tentou dar sentido a quase um quarto de século de pesquisas examinando o impacto da cultura nos níveis individual, grupo/organizacional e nacional. No presente comentário, nós fornecemos: (A) um resumo do progresso que tem sido feito na década, e mais importante, (B) um novo conjunto de recomendações para a próxima década para orientar aqueles que desejam estudar o papel da cultura nacional nas organizações.

概要

我们2006年的国际商务研究杂志文章,“文化的后果的四分之一世纪:运用霍夫斯泰德文化价值观框架的实证研究综述”,对1980年至2002年6月间发表的180篇运用了霍夫斯泰德跨文化价值观框架的实证研究期刊文章和书章进行了全面的综述。我们审查了将文化定位于主要作用或者调节作用的实证研究。该综述试图解读在个人、团体/组织、和国家层面上近四分之一世纪的调查文化影响力的研究。在本评论中,我们提供:a)对其间十年中取得进展的总结,最重要的是,(b)针对下个十年的一组新的建议,以指导对国家文化在组织里的作用的研究。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. 2014. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4): 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. 1937. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2008. Innovation in multinational firms: Does cultural fit enhance performance? Management International Review, 48(2): 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R. F. 2003. Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martinez, V. 2012. Multiculturalism: Cultural, personality, and social processes. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 623–648). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. 2002. Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5): 492–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H. 2004. Culture and aggression – from context to coercion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1): 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. 2003. Unpacking country effects: On the need to operationalize the psychological determinants of cross-national differences. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 333–367). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprar, D. V. 2011. Foreign locals: A cautionary tale on the culture of MNC local employees. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 608–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprar, D. V., Devinney, T. M., Kirkman, B. L., & Caligiuri, P. 2015. Conceptualizing and measuring culture in international business and management: From challenges to potential solutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9): 1011–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, G. T., & Moon, H. 2005. The cultural mosaic: A metatheory for understanding the complexity of culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6): 1128–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., & Hunt, R. G. 1997. Testing the effects of vertical and horizontal collectivism: A study of reward allocation preferences in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(1): 44–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., & Hui, H. 1998. Deciding on equity or parity: A test of situational, cultural, and individual factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(2): 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Geluykens, R., & Choi, C. 2006. The importance of language in global teams: A linguistic perspective. MIR: Management International Review, 46(6): 679–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kim, K., Farh, C. I. C., & Tangirala, S. 2010. When does cross-cultural motivation enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support and cultural distance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 1110–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chreim, S., Williams, B. E., & Hinings, C. R. 2007. Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1515–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. 2010. Multi-level analysis of peer support, Internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes – The contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55(1): 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. 2014. An embedded model of cultural adaptation in global teams. Organization Science, 25(4): 1056–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, R. D., & Gibson, C. B. 2012. Margins, membership and mobility: Re-defining boundaries in collective endeavors. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 715–726). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, R., & Gibson, C. B. 2013. Collaboration for the common good: An examination of challenges and adjustment processes in multicultural collaborations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6): 764-790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, R. D., & Gibson, C. B. 2014. The collaboration conundrum: A new theory for an emerging organizational form. In J. A. Miles (Ed.), New directions for management and organization theory (pp. 143–180). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Erez, M. 1997. The transplanted executive. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. 2002. Multinational teams: A new perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, K., & Cranston, N. 2009. Managing transnational education: Does national culture really matter? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(1): 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. 1993. Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. 2011. Whence differences in value priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7): 1127–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, S. R. 2013. Multicultural employees: A framework for understanding how they contribute to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4): 525–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielidis, C., Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Dos Santos Pearson, V., & Villareal, L. 1997. Preferred styles of conflict resolution: Mexico and the US. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(6): 661–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., & Raver, J. L. 2006. On the nature and importance of cultural tightness–looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1225–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. In M. I. Posner & M. K. Rothbart (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 58, pp. 479–514). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. M., & Fehr, R. 2008. To prosper, organizational psychology should adopt a global perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(4): 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. 1994. The impact of national culture on organization structure: Evidence from cross-cultural interviews. In S. B. Prasad (Ed.), Advances in international comparative management (Vol. 9, pp. 3–37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. 1999. Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2): 138-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. 2003. Quality of team service: The role of field independent culture, quality orientation, and quality improvement focus. Small Group Research, 34(5): 619–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Dibble, R. D. 2008. Culture inside and out: Developing the collective capability to externally adjust. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Advances in cultural intelligence (pp. 221–240). New York: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. 2006. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3): 451–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Grubbs, A. 2005. Turning the tides in multinational teams. In D. L. Shapiro, M. A. Von Glinow, & J. L. C. Cheng (Eds.), Managing multinational teams: Global perspectives, advances in international management (Vol. 18, pp. 69–95). Bingley: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Marcoulides, G. A. 1995. The cultural contingency approach to leadership: Examining the invariance of a leadership model across four countries. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7(2): 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & McDaniel, D. 2010. Moving beyond conventional wisdom: Advancements in cross-cultural organizational behavior theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4): 450–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. 2001. Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2): 274–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. 2002. Minding your metaphors: Applying the concept of teamwork metaphors to the management of teams in multicultural contexts. Organizational Dynamics, 31(2): 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., Conger, J., & Cooper, C. 2001. Perceptual distance: Impacts of differences in team leader and member perceptions across cultures. In W. H. Mobley & M. McCall (Eds.), Advances in global leadership (Vol. 2, pp. 245–276). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Schwab, D. P. 2003. Team effectiveness in multinational organizations: Evaluation across contexts. Group & Organization Management, 28(4): 444–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., Waller, M. J., Carpenter, M., & Conte, J. 2007. Antecedents, consequences, and moderators of time perspective heterogeneity for knowledge management in MNO teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8): 1005–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., Maznevski, M. L., & Kirkman, B. L. 2009. When does culture matter? In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 46–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. 2014. Where global and virtual meet: The value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first century teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., Dunlop, P., Caprar, D., & Raghav, S. 2016. Multiple identities in global team: Exploring the role of identity synergy in team processes and outcomes. In 2016 Academy of Management. Anaheim, CA.

  • Hall, E. T. 1976. Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. 2004. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hjaro, A., Gibson, C. B., & Pudelko, M. 2016. The relationship between organizational diversity climate, knowledge exchange processes and effectiveness in multicultural teams. Academy of Management Journal (forthcoming).

  • Hobson, C. J., & Gibson, F. W. 1983. Policy capturing as an approach to understanding and improving performance appraisal: A review of the literature. Academy of Management Review, 8(4): 640–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. 2009. Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1): 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization on World Migration (IOM). 2015. World Migration Report: Migrants and cities: New partnerships to management mobility. Geneva: Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & de Luque, M. S. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 897–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. 2015. Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. K., & Mastin, T. 2008. How cultural difference affects international tourism public relations websites: A comparative analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Public Relations Review, 34(1): 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., Leung, K., Sia, C. L., & Lee, M. K. O. 2004. Is eCommerce boundary-less? Effects of individualism–collectivism and uncertainty avoidance on Internet shopping. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 545–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. 2001. The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. 2006. A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural value framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. 2009. Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4): 744–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. 2012. Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual teams research. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), Oxford handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 789–858). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Shapiro, D. L., Lu, S., & McGurrin, D. P. 2016. Culture and teams. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8(April): 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S. 2002. Culture and basic psychological processes – Toward a system view of culture. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1): 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. 1954. Culture and behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., Bhagat, R., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. 2011. Beyond national culture and culture-centricism: A reply to Gould and Grein (2009). Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1): 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. 2004. Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 119–197). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Morris, M. W. 2015. Values, schemas, and norms in the culture-behavior nexus: A situated dynamics framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9): 1028–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. 2005. Culture and international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4): 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. 2007. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2): 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, G., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2014. Multiculturalism from a cognitive perspective: Patterns and implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2): 169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H., & Janssens, M. 1995. A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 167–214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu, C., Yuen, D. C. Y., & Zhang, X. 2016. Individualist–collectivist culture, ownership concentration and earnings quality. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics. doi:10.1080/16081625.2015.1129281.

  • Maznevski, M. L. 1994. Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations, 47(5): 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. 2000. Bridging space over time: Global virtual-team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5): 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. R. 2011. The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, D., & Gibson, C. B. 2012. Emergent ideas in emerging markets: The process of discovery in organizational research. In C. L. Wang, D. J. Ketchen Jr., & D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 8, pp. 39–59). Bingley: Emerald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1): 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parades, A. A. P., & Wheatley, C. M. 2016. The influence of culture on real earnings management. International Journal of Emerging Markets (in press).

  • Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 589–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. 2003. A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2): 169–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. 2014. Rethinking the concept and measurement of societal culture in light of empirical findings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2014. Data taken from the database of Seoul Metropolitan Government, http://stat.seoul.go.kr.

  • Smith, P. B. 2002. Culture’s Consequences: Something old and something new. Human Relations, 55(1): 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, A. M., Farhangmehr, M., & Shoham, A. 2007. Hofstede’s dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of Business Research, 60(3): 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., et al. 2001. Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well-being: An ecological level international study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8): 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. 2010. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 690–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, T., & Gibson, C. B. 2009. The role of cultural elements in virtual teams. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 272–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., & Ones, D. S. 2002. Personality and happiness: A national-level analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3): 767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., & Taras, V. 2010. Culture as consequence: A multi-level multivariate meta-analysis of the effects of individual and country characteristics on work-related cultural values. Journal of International Management, 16(2): 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., Burgess, L., & Louviere, J. J. 2005. Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(4): 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., & Steel, P. 2009. Beyond Hofstede: Challenging the 10 testaments of cross-cultural research. In C. Nakata (Ed.), Beyond Hofstede: Culture frameworks for global marketing and management (pp. 40–61). Chicago, IL: Macmillan/Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. 2010. Examining the impact of Culture’s Consequences: A three-decade, multi-level, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3): 405–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. 2010. Negative practice-value correlations in the GLOBE data: Unexpected findings, questionnaire limitations and research directions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8): 1330–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. 2011. Three decades of research on national culture in the workplace: Do the differences still make a difference? Organizational Dynamics, 40(3): 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Rowney, J., & Steel, P. 2012. Work-related acculturation: Change in individual work-related cultural values following immigration. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1/2): 130–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. 2012. Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstede’s dimensions. Journal of World Business, 47(3): 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. 2016. Does country equal culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56(4): 455–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C., & Albert, R. D. 1987. Cross-cultural perspectives. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putman, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 264–295). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. 2014. Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2): 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). 2013. International Migration 2013. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Report (UNDP). 2009. Human Development Report 2009 – Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 2012. Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.census.gov.

  • van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. 2007. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1): 515–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glinow, M. A., Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. 2004. Can we talk, and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. Academy of Management Review, 29(4): 578–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vough, H. 2012. Not all identifications are created equal: Exploring employee accounts for workgroup, organizational and professional identification. Organization Science, 23(3): 778–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, P., & Chaturvedi, S. 2009. The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Management, 35(5): 1228–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. 2007. Procedural justice climate and group power distance: An examination of cross-level interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3): 681–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Gibson, C. B. 2006. Multinational organizational context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Gibson, C. B. 2014. How does culture matter? A process view of cultural interaction in groups. In M. Yuki & M. Brewer (Eds.), Frontiers of culture and psychology series: Culture and group processes (pp. 166–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., Brass, D. J., Choi, J., & Zhang, Z. 2009. Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6): 1544–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley L Kirkman.

Additional information

Accepted by John Cantwell, Editor-in-Chief, on 21 August 2016. This article has been single-blind reviewed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B. & Gibson, C.B. A retrospective on Culture’s Consequences: The 35-year journey. J Int Bus Stud 48, 12–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0037-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0037-9

Keywords

Navigation