Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring relationships between nation branding and foreign direct investment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the influence of nation branding on a country’s ability to send and receive foreign direct investment (FDI). Employing Anholt’s Nation Brand Index (NBI) and FDI data, the relationship is analyzed using valued exponential random graph models (ERGM) to account for interdependence between FDI flows while simultaneously estimating the changes in FDI flows in respect to differences in NBI scores. The study finds that while a stronger nation brand does contribute positively to both incoming and outgoing FDI flows, there are important differences in how different categories of nation branding contribute to FDI flows. Namely, the Export category is strongly associated with outgoing FDI, the Investment, Government, and Culture categories are positively associated with incoming FDI, and that the People and Tourism categories are negatively associated with incoming FDI. This study contributes to the nascent literature on place branding in that it combines the prominent Eclectic Paradigm for FDI from the economics literature with marketing and communication literature’s theories on nation branding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/anholt-ipsos-nation-brands-index.pdf.

  2. https://www.futurebrand.com/futurebrand-country-index.

  3. Full model results are provided in the Appendix.

References

  • Aizenman, Joshua, and Ilan Noy. 2006. FDI and trade: Two-way linkages? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46 (3): 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allee, Todd, and Clint Peinhardt. 2011. Contingent credibility: The impact of investment treaty violations on foreign direct investment. International Organization 65 (3): 401–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anholt, Simon. 2004. Nation-brands and the value of provenance. Destination Branding, 26–39.

  • Anholt, Simon. 2005. Anholt nation brands index: How does the world see America? Journal of Advertising Research 45 (3): 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anholt, Simon. 2006. Brand new justice. Milton Park: Routledge.

  • Arel-Bundock, Vincent. 2017. The political determinants of foreign direct investment: A firm-level analysis. International Interactions 43 (3): 424–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronczyk, Melissa. 2013. Branding the nation: The global business of national identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ayuningtias, Vidya. 2018. Nation Branding Through Investment Promotion. PhD diss., Oklahoma State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard E. 2006. Globalisation: the great unbundling (s). Technical report. Economic council of Finland.

  • Bose, Sunny, Sudeepta Pradhan, Makhmoor Bashir, and Sanjit K Roy. 2021. Customer-based place brand equity and tourism: A regional identity perspective. Journal of Travel Research.

  • Bose, Sunny, Sanjit Kumar Roy, and Abhay Kumar Tiwari. 2016. Measuring customer-based place brand equity (CBPBE): An investment attractiveness perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing 24 (7): 617–634.

  • Busse, Matthias, and Carsten Hefeker. 2007. Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büthe, Tim, and Helen V. Milner. 2008. The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: Increasing FDI through international trade agreements? American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 741–762.

  • Büthe, Tim, and Helen V Milner. 2014. Foreign direct investment and institutional diversity in trade agreements: Credibility, commitment, and economic flows in the developing world, 1971–2007. World Politics 66 (01): 88–122.

  • Desmarais, Bruce A., and Skyler J Cranmer. 2012. Micro-level interpretation of exponential random graph models with application to estuary networks. Policy Studies Journal 40 (3): 402–434.

  • Dunning, John H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, John H. 2001. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International journal of the economics of business 8 (2): 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, Andreas, Leonardo Baccini, and Manfred Elsig. 2014. The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. The Review of International Organizations 9 (3): 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, Robert C., Robert Inklaar, and Marcel P. Timmer. 2015. The next generation of the Penn world table. American Economic Review 105 (10): 3150–3182.

  • Fullerton, Jami, and Alice Kendrick. 2017. Country reputation as a moderator of tourism advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications 23 (3): 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibler, Douglas M. 2009. International military alliances, 1648-2008. CQ Press.

  • Graham, Benjamin A. T., Noel P. Johnston, and Allison F. Kingsley. 2018. Even constrained governments take: The domestic politics of transfer and expropriation risks. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (8): 1784–1813.

  • Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz, and Stephen R. Yeaple. 2004. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94 (1): 300–316.

  • International Monetary Fund. 2021. Balance of payments database. The World Ban. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:26447.

  • Jacobsen, Björn P. 2012. Place brand equity: A model for establishing the effectiveness of place brands. Journal of Place Management and Development.

  • Jakobsen, Jo, and Indra De Soysa. 2006. Do foreign investors Punish Democracy? Theory and empirics, 1984–2001. Kyklos 59 (3): 383–410.

  • Jensen, Nathan M. 2003. Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization 57 (03): 587–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Leslie, and Rachel L Wellhausen. 2016. Under one roof: Supply chains and the protection of foreign investment.American Political Science Review 110 (1): 31–51.

  • Kahouli, Bassem, and Samir Maktouf. 2015. The determinants of FDI and the impact of the economic crisis on the implementation of RTAs: A static and dynamic gravity model. International Business Review 24 (3): 518–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamova, Margarita M, and Kai A Konrad. 2010. Nation brands and foreign direct investment. Kyklos 63, (3): 400–431.

  • Kavaratzis, Mihalis, and Gregory J. Ashworth. 2006. City branding: An effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Place Branding 2 (3): 183–194.

  • Keller, Kevin Lane. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing 57 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindra, Gurprit Singh, Nicolino Strizzi, and Norma Mansor. 1998. The role of marketing in FDI generation: Evidence from ASEAN countries. International Business Review 7 (4): 399–421.

  • Krivitsky, Pavel N. 2012. Exponential-family random graph models for valued networks. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6: 1100.

  • Kurtishi-Kastrati, Selma. 2013. The effects of foreign direct investments for host country’s economy. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 5 (1).

  • Lahrech, Abdelmounaim, Sami Zaki Alabdulwahab, and Safaâ Bouayach. 2020. Nation branding and how it is related to foreign direct investment inflows. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 10 (2): 248.

  • Li, Quan, Erica Owen, and Austin Mitchell. 2018. Why do democracies attract more or less foreign direct investment? A metaregression analysis. International Studies Quarterly 62 (3): 494–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Quan, and Tatiana Vashchilko. 2010. Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (5): 765–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Wai-Kwan, and Robert S. Wyer Jr. 1994. The role of country of origin in product evaluations: Informational and standard-of-comparison effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology 3 (2): 187–212.

  • Liu, Fang, Jamie Murphy, and Jing Li. 2017. Country of origin, country image, and wine. in Shaping international public opinion: A model for nation branding and public diplomacy, 133–148. Peter Lang Publishing.

  • Mariutti, Fabiana Gondim. 2017. The placement of country reputation towards place management. Journal of Place Management and Development.

  • Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers. 2010. Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2008, July http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.

  • Medvedev, Denis. 2012. Beyond trade: The impact of preferential trade agreements on FDI inflows. World Development 40 (1): 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, Marc J. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6): 1695–1725.

  • Morisset, Jacques, and Kelly Andrews-Johnson. 2004. The effectiveness of promotion agencies at attracting foreign direct investment. Vol. 16. World Bank Publications.

  • Narula, Rajneesh, and Nigel Driffield. 2012. Does FDI cause development? The ambiguity of the evidence and why it matters. The European Journal of Development Research 24 (1): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2016. Bilateral trade in goods by industry and end-use (BTDIxE), ISIC Rev.4. http://www.oecd.org/trade/bilateraltradeingoodsbyindustryandend-usecategory.htm.

  • Osnago, Alberto, Nadia Rocha, and Michele Ruta. 2016. Do deep trade agreements boost vertical FDI? The World Bank Economic Review 30 (Supplement 1): S119–S125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A., and Alain J. P. Jolibert. 1995. A meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (4): 883–900.

  • Pilny, Andrew, and Yannick Atouba. 2018. Modeling valued organizational communication networks using exponential random graph models. Management Communication Quarterly 32 (2): 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneman, John, Boliang Zhu, and Bruce A Desmarais. 2020. Complex dependence in foreign direct investment: Network theory and empirical analysis. Political Science Research and Methods 1–17.

  • Schooler, Robert D. 1965. Product bias in the Central American common market. Journal of marketing research 2 (4): 394–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Hyunjin. 2015. Uncovering the structural underpinnings of political discussion networks: Evidence from an exponential random graph model. Journal of Communication 65 (1): 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., and P. W. J. Verlegh. 1999. A review and meta-analysis of countryof-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (5): 521–546.

  • The Economist. 2021. China seems intent on decoupling its companies from Western markets. The Economist, July. https://www.economist.com/business/2021/ 07/10/china-seems-intent-on-decoupling-its-companies-fromwestern-markets.

  • UNCTAD. 2014. Bilateral FDI Statistics. New York: United Nations.

  • Wright, Joseph, and Boliang Zhu. 2018. Monopoly rents and foreign direct investment in fixed assets. International Studies Quarterly 62 (2): 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Long, Zuanshi Liu, William Wei, and Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan. 2017. FDI out-flows, exports and financial development. Journal of Economic Studies.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jami Fullerton.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Summary statistics

Summary statistics

See Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4figure 4figure 4

Frequency count bar-plots for binary variables and distribution plots for continuous variables

Country list

See Table 1.

Table 1 List of Countries included in sample N = 40

Full model results

See Figs. 5, 6 and 7.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Estimates of network control terms in Poisson ERGMs. Bars span 95% confidence intervals. Some confidence intervals are not visible due to being small and the large range

Fig. 6
figure 6

Estimates of exogenous edge terms in Poisson ERGMs. Bars span 95% confidence intervals. Some confidence intervals are not visible due to being small and the large range

Fig. 7
figure 7

Estimates of exogenous node terms in Poisson ERGMs. Bars span 95% confidence intervals. Some confidence intervals are not visible due to being small and the large range

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schoeneman, J., Fullerton, J. Exploring relationships between nation branding and foreign direct investment. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 266–279 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00264-4

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00264-4

Keywords

Navigation