Abstract
Governments sponsor student-mobility programs with the expectation that students will build a more favorable and informed opinion of the host country which, in turn, will determine more favorable behavior towards the host country. Nevertheless, assessments of this logic are rare. Based on a survey of the Korean Government Scholarship Program’s alumni (n = 579), we analyze the alumni’s country image of South Korea and how this image determines their relationship maintenance behavior with South Korean people. Our findings show that the KGSP alumni’s image of South Korea partly explains the variance in their personal and professional relationship maintenance with South Koreans. Our findings show that the alumni’s emotions about South Korea influence their personal relationship maintenance behavior more than does each of the cognitive dimensions of the country image, while the functional dimension, which evaluates their beliefs about the country’s competencies and the competitiveness of its economic and political systems, has the highest influence on the alumni’s professional relationship maintenance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology, ed. J. Kuhl, and J. Beckmann. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179–211.
Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Miadenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Astfalk, T., and B. Müller-Hilke. 2018. Same same but different—A qualitative study on the development and maintenance of personal networks among German and international medical students. GMS Journal for Medical Education 35(5): Doc58.
Ayhan, K.J. 2019. The boundaries of public diplomacy and non-state actors: A taxonomy of perspectives. International Studies Perspectives 20(1): 63–83.
Ayhan, K.J. 2020. A typology of people-to-people diplomacy. https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/typology-people-people-diplomacy. Accessed 23 June 2020.
Aziz, N., H. Ilhan, B.A. Friedman, N. Bayyurt, and İ. Keleş. 2016. Universities as stakeholders that influence students’ intention to visit a place. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 12(4): 249–267.
Bachner, D., and U. Zeutschel. 2009. Long-term effects of international educational youth exchange. Intercultural Education 20(1): 45–58.
Banks, R. 2011. A resource guide to public diplomacy evaluation. CPD perspectives on public diplomacy 19.
Bevis, T.B. 2013. A history of higher education exchange: China and America. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bollen, K.A. 1984. Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship? Quality and Quantity. 18(4): 377–385.
Boyd, B.L., C. Giebler, M. Hince, Y. Liu, N. Mehta, R. Rash, and Y. Yanta. 2001. Does study abroad make a difference? An impact assessment of the international 4-H youth exchange program. Journal of Extension 39(5): n5.
Brown, R. 2013. The politics of relational public diplomacy. In Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift, ed. R.S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, and A. Fisher, 44–55. New York, NY: Routledge.
Buhmann, A. 2016. Measuring country image. Fribourg: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Buhmann, A., and D. Ingenhoff. 2015. The 4D Model of the country image: An integrative approach from the perspective of communication management. International Communication Gazette 77(1): 102–124.
Byun, K., and M. Kim. 2011. Shifting patterns of the government’s policies for the internationalization of Korean higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education 15(5): 467–486.
Cai, J., and T. Loo. 2014. Decision making in international tertiary education: The role of national image. Advances in Journalism and Communication 2(03): 109.
Chin, W.W. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 295(2): 295–336.
China Power Project. 2016. Is China both a source and hub for international students?https://chinapower.csis.org/china-international-students/. Accessed 14 Sept 2019.
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behaviors science, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Cull, N.J. 2013. The long road to public diplomacy 2.0: The internet in US public diplomacy. International Studies Review 15(1): 123–139.
Diamantopoulos, A., and H.M. Winklhofer. 2001. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 269–277.
Eder, J., W.W. Smith, and R.E. Pitts. 2010. Exploring factors influencing student study abroad destination choice. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 10(3): 232–250.
Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fitzpatrick, K.R. 2007. Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2(3): 187–211.
Fornell, C., and F. Bookstein. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research. 19(4): 440–452.
Fornell, C., B.-D. Rhee, and Y. Yi. 1991. Direct regression, reverse regression, and covariance structure analysis. Marketing Letters 2(3): 309–320.
Garson, D. 2016. Partial least squares (PLS-SEM). Asheboro, NC: Statistical Publishing.
Gregory, B. 2008. Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 274–290.
Hair, J.F., G.T.M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Hair, J.F., J.J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C.M. Ringle. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review 31(1): 2–24.
Ingenhoff, D., T. Zhang, A. Buhmann, C. White, and S. Kiousis. 2018. Analyzing value drivers and effects of 4d country images on stakeholders’ behavior across three different cultures. In Bridging disciplinary perspectives of country image reputation, brand, and identity: Reputation, brand, and identity, ed. D. Ingenhoff, C. White, A. Buhmann, and S. Kiousis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jiang, J., and W. Shen. 2019. International mentorship and research collaboration: Evidence from European-trained Chinese PhD returnees. Frontiers of Education in China 14(2): 180–205.
Kim, S.B., and K.J. Kwon. 2018. Examining the relationships of image and attitude on visit intention to Korea among Tanzanian college students: The moderating effect of familiarity. Sustainability 10(2): 360.
Lane, P. 2013. French scientific and cultural diplomacy. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
Leonard, M., C. Stead, and C. Smewing. 2002. Public diplomacy. London, UK: Foreign Policy Centre.
Ley, P. 1972. Quantitative aspects of psychological assessment. London, UK: Duckworth.
Li, J., F. Liu, and J.I. Rojas-Méndez. 2013. How international students select offshore programs: The influence of image, attitude, subject norm, and perceived behavioral control. Asia Pacific Education Review 14(3): 381–390.
MOFA. 2016. 2016 diplomatic white paper. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/brd/m_5684/view.do?seq=317960&srchFr=&. Accessed 7 May 2019.
Nadeau, J., and A.H. Olafsen. 2015. Country image evaluations and migration intentions. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11(4): 293–308.
NIIED. 2018. Korean Government Scholarship Program. https://www.studyinkorea.go.kr/en/sub/gks/allnew_invite.do. Accessed 2 Oct 2019.
Nye, J. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: Public affairs.
Nye, J. 2008. The powers to lead. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Pahlavi, P.C. 2007. Evaluating public diplomacy programmes. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2(3): 255–281.
Olberding, J.C., and D.J. Olberding. 2010. “Ripple effects” in youth peacebuilding and exchange programs: Measuring impacts beyond direct participants. International Studies Perspectives 11(1): 75–91.
Pamment, J. 2018. Public diplomacy. In The encyclopedia of diplomacy, vol. 3, ed. G. Martel, 1–12. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pamment, J. 2014. Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands. Public Relations Review 40(1): 50–59.
Pietsch, T. 2010. Wandering scholars? Academic mobility and the British world, 1850–1940. Journal of Historical Geography 36(4): 377–387.
Rahman, M.S., H. Hassan, A. Osman-Gani, F.A.M. Abdel Fattah, and M.A. Anwar. 2017. Edu-tourist’s perceived service quality and perception—The mediating role of satisfaction from foreign students’ perspectives. Tourism Review 72(2): 156–170.
Scott-Smith, G. 2008. Exchange programs and public diplomacy. In Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, ed. N. Snow and P. Taylor, 70–76. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sevin, E. 2017. Public diplomacy and the implementation of foreign policy in the U.S., Sweden and Turkey. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shafaei, A., and N.A. Razak. 2016. International postgraduate students’ cross-cultural adaptation in Malaysia: Antecedents and outcomes. Research in Higher Education 57(6): 739–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9404-9.
Snow, N. 2008. International exchanges and the US image. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 198–222.
Snow, N. 2010. Public diplomacy: New dimensions and implications. In Global communication: Theories, stakeholders and trends, 3rd ed, ed. T.L. McPhail, 84–102. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sunal, D.W., and C.C. Sunal. 1991. Professional and personal effects of the American Fulbright experience in Africa. African Studies Review 34(2): 97–123.
Thomas, A.E., B. Pflanzl, and A. Völkl. 2016. Broadening the mind: Beneficial effects of sojourn experiences and contact with visiting international students on prospective teachers’ motivation to avoid prejudiced behavior. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 50: 89–95.
Van Ham, P. 2014. Social power in public diplomacy. In Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy, ed. R.S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, and A. Fisher, 31–42. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wang, C.L., D. Li, B.R. Barnes, and J. Ahn. 2012. Country image, product image and consumer purchase intention: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Business Review 21(6): 1041–1051.
Wilson, I. 2014. International education programs and political influence: Manufacturing sympathy?. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yiǧit Gülseven, A. 2017. Rethinking Russian pan-Slavism in the Ottoman Balkans: NP Ignatiev and the Slavic Benevolent Committee (1856–77). Middle Eastern Studies 53(3): 332–348.
Yousaf, S., X. Fan, and F. Laber. 2020. Branding China through the internationalization of higher education sector: An international students’ perspective from China. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1710890.
Yun, S.-H. 2006. Toward public relations theory-based study of public diplomacy: Testing the applicability of the excellence study. Journal of Public Relations Research 18(4): 287–312.
Yun, S.-H., and E.L. Toth. 2009. Future sociological public diplomacy and the role of public relations: Evolution of public diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist 53(4): 493–503.
Yun, S.-H. 2014. Do international students’ direct experiences with the host country lead to strong attitude-behavior relations? Advancing public diplomacy research and beyond. International Journal of Communication 8: 787–809.
Zaharna, R.S. 2009. Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives: Information and relational communication frameworks. In Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, ed. N. Snow and P.M. Taylor, 86–100. New York: Routledge.
Zaharna, R.S. 2010. Battles to bridges: US strategic communication and public diplomacy after 9/11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zaharna, R.S. 2011. The public diplomacy challenges of strategic stakeholder engagement. In Trials of engagement: The future of US public diplomacy, ed. A. Fisher and S. Lucas, 201–229. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Zaharna, R.S., A. Fisher, and A. Arsenault. 2013. Introduction: The connective mindshift. In Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift, ed. R.S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, and A. Fisher, 1–14. New York, NY: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
This project is supported by the 2018 and 2019 Korea Foundation Support for Policy-Oriented Research grants. We would like to thank Hyelim Lee and Tom Norris for invaluable research assistance; Moamen Gouda, Nancy Snow, Jeongnam Kim, Yeunjae Lee, Alexander Buhmann, Seong-Hun Yun, Rhonda Zaharna, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix 1: Questionnaire
Formative dimension items | How much do you agree with this statement? [Strongly disagree—1, Strongly agree—7] |
---|---|
functional1 | South Korea’s economy is highly innovative and fit for the future |
functional2 | South Korea produces very high-quality goods and services |
functional3 | South Korea has highly competent entrepreneurs |
functional4 | South Korea is very wealthy |
functional5 | South Korea is technologically highly advanced |
functional6 | South Korea holds a strong position in the global economy |
functional7 | The labor markets in South Korea are equipped with highly competent people |
functional8 | South Korea has a globally influential culture |
functional9 | Athletes and sports teams from South Korea are internationally known for their success |
functional10 | Competent officials govern South Korean politics |
functional11 | South Korea has a very stable political system |
functional12 | South Korea has a well-functioning infrastructure |
functional13 | South Korea provides well-functioning welfare systems and pension plans |
functional14 | South Korea is highly innovative in science and research |
functional15 | South Korea provides great educational opportunities |
functional16 | The level of education in South Korea is very high |
normative1 | South Korea is very active in protecting the environment |
normative2 | South Korea is known for its strong commitment to social issues (e.g., development aid, civil rights) |
normative3 | South Korea has high ethical standards |
normative4 | South Korea is a socially responsible member of the international community |
normative5 | South Korea respects the values of other nations and peoples |
normative6 | South Korea takes responsibility for helping out in international crises |
normative7 | South Korea is a welcoming country |
normative8 | South Korea has excellent civil rights |
normative9 | South Korea has a very just welfare system |
normative10 | South Korea acts very fairly in international politics |
aesthetic1 | South Korea is home to beautiful cultural assets (e.g., arts, architecture, music, film etc.) |
aesthetic2 | South Korea has delicious foods and a wonderful cuisine |
aesthetic3 | South Korea has a very fascinating history |
aesthetic4 | South Korea has rich traditions |
aesthetic5 | South Korea has beautiful scenery |
aesthetic6 | South Korea has a lot of preserved nature |
aesthetic7 | South Korea has lots of charismatic people (e.g., in politics, sports, media, etc.) |
Appendix 2: Supplementary data
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varpahovskis, E., Ayhan, K.J. Impact of country image on relationship maintenance: a case study of Korean Government Scholarship Program alumni. Place Brand Public Dipl 18, 52–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00177-0
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00177-0