Skip to main content
Log in

The Psychic Life of Fragments: Splitting from Ferenczi to Klein*

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The present paper starts from the reflection that there is a curious “phenomenological gap” in psychoanalysis when it comes to processes of splitting and to describing the “life” of psychic fragments resulting from processes of splitting. In simpler terms, we are often in a position to lack a precise understanding of what is being split and how the splitting occurs. I argue that although Melanie Klein’s work is often engaged when talking of splitting (particularly through discussions on identification, projection and projective identification), there are some important phenomenological opacities in her construction. I show that by orchestrating a dialogue between Melanie Klein and Sándor Ferenczi, we arrive at a fuller and more substantive conception of psychic splitting and of the psychic life of fragments which are the result of splitting. This is even more meaningful because there are some unacknowledged genealogical connections between Ferenczian concepts and Kleinian concepts, which I here explore. While with Klein we remain in the domain of “good” and “bad” objects—polarised objects which are constantly split and projected—with Ferenczi we are able to also give an account of complicated forms of imitation producing psychic fragments and with a “dark” side of identification, which he calls “identification with the aggressor”. While attempting to take steps toward imagining a dialogue between Klein and Ferenczi, I note a certain silent “Ferenczian turn” in a late text by Melanie Klein, “On the Development of Mental Functioning”, written in 1958. In particular, I reflect on her reference to some “terrifying figures” of the psyche, which cannot be accounted for simply as the persecutory parts of the super-ego but are instead more adequately read as more enigmatic and more primitive psychic fragments, resulting from processes of splitting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bálint, A. (1931). Identification. In A gyermekszoba pszichologiája, 4th Chapter. [The psychology of the nursery] Original Hungarian work is republished in 1943 in the International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 24, 97–107.

  • Bell, D. (2001). Projective identification. In C. Bronstein (Ed.), Kleinian theory: A contemporary perspective (pp. 125–147). London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, M. S. (1996). The tragic encounter between Freud and Ferenczi. In P. Rudnytsky, A. Bokay, & P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis (pp. 145–159). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1955). Language and the schizophrenic. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, & R. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis (pp. 220–239). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40, 308–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabant, É. (2003). Les voies de la passion. Les rapports entre Freud et Ferenczi. Le Coq-Héron, 3, 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, R. (1998). Introduction to belief and imagination (pp. 1–7). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canestri, J. (2002). Projective identification: The fate of the concept in Italy and Spain. Psychoanalysis in Europe, Bulletin, 56, 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. (1997). Projective identification: The analyst’s involvement. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, 227–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1908). Psycho-analysis and education. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher, et al. (Trans.). (pp. 280–290). London: Karnac Books. 1994.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1909). Introjection and transference. In First contributions to psycho-analysis. E. Mosbacher (Trans.). (pp. 35–93). London: Karnac Books. 1980.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1912a). The symbolic representation of the pleasure and reality principles in the Oedipus myth. Sex in psychoanalysis (pp. 253–269). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1912b). On the definition of introjection. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.). (pp. 316–318). London: Karnac Books. 1980.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1921). Psycho-analytical observations on tic. In Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis. (J. I. Suttie, Trans.). (pp. 142–174). London: Karnac Books.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1922). Freud’s “Group psychology and the analysis of the ego”. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.). (pp. 371–376). London: Karnac Books.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1925). Psychoanalysis of sexual habits. In Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis. J. I. Suttie (Trans.). (pp. 259–297). London: Karnac Books, 1980.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1929). The principle of relaxation and neocatharsis. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. Ed. M. Balint, E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.). (pp. 108–125). London: Karnac Books, 1980.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1930a). Each adaptation is proceeded by an inhibited attempt at splitting. Notes and fragments. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. Ed. M. Balint. E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.) (p. 220). London: Karnac Books.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1930b). Autoplastic and alloplastic adaptation. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.) (p. 221). London: Karnac Books.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1931a). Trauma and anxiety. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.). (pp. 249–250). London: Karnac Books.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1931b). The birth of the intellect. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of Psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher et al. (Trans.). (pp. 244–246). London: Karnac Books.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1932a). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1988.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1932b). On shock. First contributions to psycho-analysis (pp. 253–254). London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child: The language of tenderness and of passion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 225–230, Published in 1949. Also in Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. M. Balint (Ed.), E. Mosbacher, et al. (Trans.). (pp. 156–167). London: Karnac Books. 1994.

  • Ferenczi, S., & Rank, O. (1924). The development of psychoanalysis. (C. Newton, Trans.). New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.

  • Flaskay, G. (2012). From patient to founder of a psychoanalytic school: Ferenczi’s influence on the works of Melanie Klein. In Ferenczi for our time. Theory and practice. J. Szekacs-Weisz & T. Keve (Eds.). (pp. 3–17). London: Karnac.

  • Freud, S. (1912–1913). Totem and taboo. Standard edition, 13. (pp. 1–161). London: Hogarth Press.

  • Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes. Standard edition, 14. (pp. 117–140). London: Hogarth Press.

  • Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Standard edition, 18. (pp. 65–143). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. & Freud, A. (1904–1938). Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud Correspondence. N. Somers (Trans.) Introduction by I. Meyer-Palemedo. London: Polity. 2013.

  • Green, J. (1949). If I were you. JHF McEwen (Trans.). New York: Harper.

  • Groddeck, G. (1923). The book of the it. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynal, A. (1997–1998). The Freud–Ferenczi relationship and its bearing on contemporary psychoanalysis. East Central Europe, 2425(1), 27–38.

  • Haynal, A. (2002). Disappearing and reviving: Sándor Ferenczi in the history of psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynal, A. E., & Haynal, V. D. (2015). Ferenczi’s attitude. In A. Harris & S. Kuchuck (Eds.), The legacy of Sándor Ferenczi: From ghost to ancestor (pp. 52–74). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Halton, I. (2015). Klein, Ferenczi and the Clinical Diary. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshelwood, R. (1988). A dictionary of Kleinian thought. London: Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, H. (2002). Projective identification: The fate of the concept in Germany. Psychoanalysis in Europe, European Psychoanalytical Federation Bulletin, 56, 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein M. (1921). The development of a child. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol.1. Love, guilt and reparation and other works 19211945. (pp. 1–53). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1925). A Contribution to the psychogenesis of tics. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol.1. Love, guilt and reparation and other works 19211945. (pp. 107–127). London: Hogarth Press, 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1928). Early stages of the Oedipus conflict. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol.1. Love, guilt and reparation and other works 19211945. (pp. 186–198). London: Hogarth Press, 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1930). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 1. Love, guilt and reparation and other works 19211945. (pp. 219–232). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1933). The early development of conscience in the child. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol 1. Love, guilt and reparation and other works 19211945. (pp. 248–257). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 3. Envy and Gratitude and other works 19461963. (pp. 1–24). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1946–1963). The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 3. Envy and Gratitude and other works 19461963. London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1955). On identification. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 3, Envy and Gratitude and other works 19461963. (pp. 141–175). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Klein, M. (1958). On the development of mental functioning. In The writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. 3, Envy and Gratitude and other works 19461963. (pp. 236–246). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Likierman, M. (2012). The “here-and-now” in Ferenczi’s thinking and its influence on Melanie Klein. In J. Szekacs-Weisz & T. Keve (Eds.), Ferenczi for our time: Theory and practice (pp. 19–25). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein. M (1948). On the theory of anxiety and guilt. In The writings of Melanie Klein, vol. 3. Envy and Gratitude and other works 19461963. (pp. 25–42). London: Hogarth Press. 1975.

  • Martín-Cabré, L. (1997). Freud-Ferenczi: Controversy terminable and interminable. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinodoz, J.-M. (2002). Projective identification: What do French-speaking analysts think? Psychoanalysis in Europe. European Psychoanalytical Federation Bulletin, 56, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesenberg-Malcolm, R. (1986). Interpretation: The past in the present. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 13, 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, H. R. (1947). Analysis of a schizophrenic state with depersonalization. In Psychotic states. (pp. 13–33). London: Hogarth Press, 1965.

  • Rosenfeld, H. R. (1964). On the psychopathology of narcissism: A clinical approach. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 45, 332–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, H. R. (1971). Contribution to the psychopathology of psychotic states: The importance of projective identification in the ego structure and object relations of the psychotic patient. In E. B. Spillius (Ed.), Melanie Klein today, vol. 1, Mainly theory (pp. 117–137). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (1988). Le trauma et la filiation paradoxale: de Freud à Ferenczi. Paris: Ramsay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38, 391–397.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1964). An introduction to the work of Melanie Klein. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodré, I. (2004). Who’s who? Notes on pathological identifications. In E. Hargreaves & A. Varchevker (Eds.), In pursuit of psychic change: The Betty Joseph workshop (pp. 53–68). London: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillius, E. (Ed.) (1988). Melanie Klein today, vol. 1, Mainly theory, vol. 2, Mainly practice. London: Routledge.

  • Spillius, E. (1991). Clinical experiences of projective identification. In R. Anderson (Ed.), Clinical lectures on Klein and Bion (pp. 59–73). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillius, E. (2007). Encounters with Melanie Klein. Selected papers of Elizabeth Spillius. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, M. (1990). Sándor Ferenczi. Reconsidering active intervention. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Mônica Aguiar, Stephen Frosh, Giselle Galdi, Marcel Hudon, Endre Koritar and Carlos Lannes. The writing of this article was supported through a Wellcome Trust Fellowship in the Medical Humanities (Grant 200347/Z/15/Z).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raluca Soreanu.

Additional information

Address correspondence to Raluca Soreanu, Ph.D., Department of Psychosocial Studies, School of Social Science, History and Philosophy, Birkbeck, University of London, 26 Russell Square, Room 230, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 5DQ, UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soreanu, R. The Psychic Life of Fragments: Splitting from Ferenczi to Klein*. Am J Psychoanal 78, 421–444 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-018-9167-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-018-9167-0

Keywords

Navigation