Skip to main content

Querying Postfeminism in Lisa Cholodenko’s The Kids Are All Right

  • Chapter

Abstract

Against a backdrop of the gay marriage debate and queer fears of homonormativity, the work of Lisa Cholodenko explores (unconventional) family values, sitting comfortably within the domestic-romantic conventions of archetypal postfeminist romantic comedies but with a same-sex twist. She has been championed by newspaper critics from the left-wing Guardian to the right-wing Daily Mail, been awarded by festivals from Sundance to the Oscars, has headlined not only the London Lesbian and Gay Film Festival (LLGFF) but also the London Film Festival itself.1 Cholodenko’s oeuvre hence encapsulates the contradictions surrounding the figure of the lesbian on the contemporary screen who, at the threshold of the convergence between queer and feminist discourses, is marked by a burden of visibility and invisibility. As LLGFF programmer Brian Robinson recognizes, Lisa Cholodenko’s success is an exception in an industry in which ‘lesbian directors remain marginalised’. ‘How many other lesbians can you name?’, Robinson demands, ‘who have made more than three narrative features?’2 Rare indeed are those intellectually-informed, feminist-helmed, queer-centred films that prove their mainstream potential by garnering Oscar nominations. As rarities, then, the films of Lisa Cholodenko are uniquely situated to assess the intersections and interactions of postfeminism and queer theory in a contemporary society for which popular culture is a major mouthpiece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sara Ahmed, Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006), p. 70

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, ‘Foreword’, in Reading the L Word, ed. by Kim Akass and Janet McCabe (London: I.B. Tauris, 2006), pp. xix–xxiv

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra, ‘Introduction: Feminist Politics and Postfeminist Culture’, in Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, ed. by Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), pp. 1–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Stéphanie Genz and Benjamin A. Brabon, Postfeminism: Cultural Texts and Theories (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amelia Jones, Susan Bee, Mira Schor and Johanna Drucker, ‘“Post-Feminism”: A Remasculinization of Culture?’, in Amelia Jones, Susan Bee, Mira Schor and Johanna Drucker (eds), M/E/A/N/I/N/G: An Anthology of Artists’ Writings, Theory and Criticism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000), pp. 7–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. See for example: Angela McRobbie, The Aftermath ofFeminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change (London: Sage, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dianne Negra, What A Girl Wants? Fantasizing the Reclamation of Self in Postfeminism (London: Routledge, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sarah Projansky, Watching Rape: Film and Television in Postfeminist Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For discussions of the interrelatedness of capitalism and queerness in particular, see for instance Alexandra Chasin, Selling Out: The Gay and Lesbian Movement Goes to Market (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wendy Lynne Lee and Laura M. Dow, ‘Queering Ecological Feminism: Erotophobia, Commodification, Art, and Lesbian Identity’, Ethics and the Environment, 6 (2001), pp. 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alan Sears, ‘Queer Anti-Capitalism: What’s Left of Lesbian and Gay Liberation?’, Science and Society, 69 (2005), pp. 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dereka Rushbrook, ‘Cities, Queer Space, and the Cosmopolitan Tourist’, GLQ, 8 (2002), pp. 183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yvette Taylor, ‘Queer, but Classless?’, in The Ashgate Research Companion to Queer Theory, ed. by Noreen Giffney and Michael O’Rourke (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), pp. 199–218

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glen Elder, Lawrence Knopp and Heidi Nast, ‘Sexuality and Space’, in Geography in America at the Dawn ofthe 21st Century, ed. by Gary L. Gaile and Cort J. Willmott (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 200–208

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee Edelman, No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004), p. 21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Negra, What A Girl Wants?: Fantasizing the Reclamation of Self in Postfeminism (London; New York: Routledge, 2009); Edelman, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See for instance Judith Roof, ‘Generational Difficulties;or, the Fear of a Barren History’, in Generations: Academic Feminists in Dialogue, ed. by E. Ann Kaplan and Devoney Looser (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), pp. 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See for instance Marilyn French, The War against Women (New York: Ballantine Books, 1992), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cheshire Calhoun, Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See for instance Only Women Press, Love Your Enemy?: The Debate between Heterosexual Feminism and Political Lesbianism (London: Only Women Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stéphanie Genz, ‘Singled Out: Postfeminism’s “New Woman” and the Dilemma of Having It All’, Journal of Popular Culture, 43 (2010), pp. 97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elspeth Probyn, ‘New Traditionalism and Post-Feminism: TV Does the Home’, Screen, 31 (1990), pp. 147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harry M. Benshoff, ‘Queers and Families in Film: From Problems to Parents’, in A Family Affair: Cinema Calls Home, ed. by Murray Pomerance (London: Wallflower, 2008), pp. 223–233

    Google Scholar 

  24. Suzanne Ferriss and Mallory Young (eds), Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies (New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Judith Halberstam, In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives (New York: New York University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hilary Radner, Neo-Feminist Cinema: Girly Films, Chick Flicks and Consumer Culture (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peter Wollen, Signs and Meaningin the Cinema (London: British Film Institute, 1969), p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Clara Bradbury-Rance

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradbury-Rance, C. (2013). Querying Postfeminism in Lisa Cholodenko’s The Kids Are All Right. In: Gwynne, J., Muller, N. (eds) Postfeminism and Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137306845_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics