Abstract
This chapter demonstrates that in sixteenth-century France the body politic metaphor was extremely flexible, providing answers — including contradictory ones — to a range of heated contemporary debates. As absolutist and constitutionalist conceptions of monarchy jostled for precedence, the metaphor could either locate sovereignty uniquely in the ‘head’ or disperse it through the ‘body’. At a time of civil war, it could be harnessed to support peace or, conversely, the resumption of hostilities. The healthy body could represent the unified French body politic but, as France became increasingly divided in the wars, a resemblance between disease and disharmony was highlighted as much as that between health and harmony. In addition, nature could constitute the target domain rather than the source, and interpretations of the metaphor in one domain influenced those in the other. This chapter highlights historically specific factors behind the use of the metaphor. I will show how the seventeenth century witnessed a more radical adaptation of the metaphor, as a mechanical and artificial ‘person’ provided a solution to problematic interpretations of the natural body.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anon. (1575). La Resolution claire et facile sur la question tant de fois faite de la prise des armes par les inferieurs (Basle: les héritiers de Jehan Oporin).
Anon. (1585). Apologie de la Paix. Representant tant les profficts et commodités que la Paix nous produict, que les malheurs, confusions, et desordres qui naissent durant la Guerre (Paris: Jean Richer).
Anon. ([1589]). Origine de la maladie de la France, avec les remedes propres à la guarison d’icelle, avec une exhortation a l’entretenement de la guerre (Paris: Jacques Varangues).
Aulotte, R. (1965). Amyot et Plutarque: La Tradition des Moralia au XVIe siècle (Geneva: Droz).
Banks, K. (2008). Cosmos and Image in the Renaissance: French Love Lyric and Natural-Philosophical Poetry (Oxford: Legenda).
Blackmore, S. (1999). The Meme Machine (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Braunrot, B. (1973). L’Imagination poétique chez Du Bartas: éléments de sensibilité baroque dans la ‘Création du monde’ (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
Burke, P. (1969). ‘Tacitism’. In T. A. Dorey (ed.), Tacitus (pp. 149–71) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Burke, P. (1991). ‘Tacitism, scepticism, and reason of state’. In J. H. Burns (ed.), The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700. (pp. 479–98) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Church, W. F. (1969). Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France (New York: Octagon Books).
Clark, C. E. (1970). ‘Montaigne and the imagery of political discourse in sixteenth-century France’, French Studies XXIV, 337–55.
Diefendorf, B. B. (1991) Beneath the Cross: Catholics and Huguenots in Sixteenth-Century Paris (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Du Bartas, Guillaume de Saluste (1935–40). La Sepmaine. In The Works of Guillaume De Salluste Sieur Du Bartas, ed. by U. Tigner Holmes, J. Coriden Lyons, R. White Linker, et al. (vol. II, pp. 193–440). (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
Fraisse, S. (1962). Une Conquête du rationalisme: l’influence de Lucrèce en France au seizième siècle (Paris: A. G. Nizet)
Frank, R. M. (in this volume). ‘Shifting identities: metaphors of discourse evolution’.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hale, D. G. (1971). The Body Politic: A Political Metaphor in Renaissance English Literature (Paris: Mouton).
Hobbes, T. (1996), Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Jouanna, A. (1989). Le De voir de ré volte: La Noblesse française et la gestation de l’État moderne, 1559–1661 (Paris: Fayard).
Kantorowicz, E. H. (1957). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Kany-Turpin, J. (1991). ‘Une Réinvention de Lucrèce par Guillaume du Bartas’. In Y. Bellenger (ed.), La Littérature et ses avatars: discrédits, déformations et réhabilitations dans l’histoire de la literature. (pp. 31–52) (Paris: Klincksieck).
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press).
Lamacz, S. (2002). ‘La Construction du savoir et la réécriture du De rerum natura dans la Sepmaine de Du Bartas’. Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance LXIV, 617–38
Lloyd, H. A. (1983). The State, France, and the Sixteenth Century (London: George Allen & Unwin).
Lycosthenes, C. (1614). Parabolarum sive similitudinum, quae ex Aristotele, Plutarcho, Plinio ac Seneca, gravissimis authoribus, olim ab Erasmo Roterodamo collectae, … loci communes (Lyon: Joannem Gazeau).
Maclean, I. (1998). ‘Foucault’s Renaissance episteme reassessed: an Aristotelian counterblast’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 59, 149–66.
Musolff, A. (2004a). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Musolff, A. (2004b). ‘Metaphor and conceptual evolution’. metaphorik.de 7 , 55–75. http://www.metaphorik.de/07/ (accessed: 2 August 2007).
O’Brien, J. (forthcoming). ‘Intestinal disorders’. In E. Vinestock and D. Foster (eds.) Writers in Conflict in Sixteenth-Century France: Essays in Honour of Malcolm Quainton (Durham: University of Durham).
Parel, A. J. (1992). The Machiavellian Cosmos (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
Pasquier, E. (1560). ‘Pourparler du prince’, in E. Pasquier, Les Recherches de la France, Livre Premier, plus, un Pourparler du prince (Paris: Vincent Sertenas).
Plutarch/Amyot (1572). Les Œuvres morales & meslees, trans. by Jacques Amyot (Paris: Michel de Vascosan).
Roberts, P. (2007). ‘The kingdom’s two bodies? Corporeal rhetoric and royal authority during the Religious Wars’, French History, 21, 147–64
Rousset, J. (1954). La Littérature de l’âge baroque en France: Circé et le paon (Paris: J. Corti).
Rousset, J. (1976). L’Intérieur et l’extérieur: essai sur la poésie et sur le théâtre au XVIe siècle (Paris: Librairie José Corti).
Seyssel, Claude de (1960). La Monarchie de France, ed. by J. Poujol (Paris: Librairie d’Argences).
Skinner, Q. (2002).Visions of Politics, vol. 3: Hobbes and Civil Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Soll, J. (2002). ‘Healing the body politic: French royal doctors, history, and the birth of a nation 1560–1634’, Renaissance Quarterly, 55, 1259–86.
Sontag, S. (1991). Illness as Metaphor and Aids and its Metaphors (London: Penguin.
Thickett, D. (1956). Bibliographie des Œuvres d’Estienne Pasquier (Geneva: Droz).
Thickett, D. (1979). Estienne Pasquier (1529–1615): The Versatile Barrister of 16th-Century France (London: Regency Press).
Zavadil, J. (in this volume). ‘Bodies politic and bodies cosmic: the Roman Stoic theory of the “two cities”’.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Kathryn Banks
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banks, K. (2009). Interpretations of the Body Politic and of Natural Bodies in Late Sixteenth-Century France. In: Musolff, A., Zinken, J. (eds) Metaphor and Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35903-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59464-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)