Skip to main content

Corporate Governance and Stockholder/Stakeholder Activism in the United States, 1790–1860: New Data and Perspectives

  • Chapter
Origins of Shareholder Advocacy

Abstract

The early United States based much of its financial development on European precedents modified to fit American circumstances and to take advantage of opportunities presenting themselves to a new nation. One area of financial development in which the United States most differed from European precedents was that of the business corporation. In Europe, corporations tended to be privileged monopolies, and there were relatively few of them. The first promoters of U.S. corporations may have had the European model in mind, but increasingly found themselves overwhelmed by democratic political forces that insisted upon the extension of corporate privileges to nearly all white males who desired them. It was in the United States, therefore, starting in the 1790s when about 300 corporations were chartered, that the old European idea of the corporation as privileged monopoly began to be transformed into the modern idea of the corporation as a competitive enterprise.

Robert E. Wright is the Nef Family Chair of Political Economy at Augustana College in South Dakota. Richard Sylla is Henry Kaufman Professor of the History of Financial Institutions and Markets in the Department of Economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angell, Joseph, and Ames, Samuel. 1832. A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations Aggregate. Boston: Hilliard, Gray, Little & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1800. Extracts from the Resolutions of Stockholders on the Delaware and Schuylkill Canal Navigation and the Procedure of the Managers Thereon in Order to Carry the Same into Effect. Philadelphia: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1841. Several Acts of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Great Falls Manufacturing Company. Great Falls: Light Press, W.D. Crockett in Wright et al. 2004, 3: 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1850. “Maine Stage Company.” Portland Daily Advertiser (August 9, 10, 12, 13, 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1851. Report of a Committee Appointed to Investigate the Affairs of the Staunton and James River Turnpike Company. Scottsville: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1856. “Real Estate.” Boston Daily Atlas (October 10, 25, 27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1871. “A Railroad Struggle in Maine.” New York Times (February 5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1881. History of Schuylkill County, Pa. with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of Some of Its Prominent Men and Pioneers. New York: W. W. Munsell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1883. “New England Gleanings.” Boston Journal (April 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banner, Stuart. 1998. Anglo-American Securities Regulation: Cultural and Political Roots, 1690–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Virginia. 1836. An Act for Incorporating the Bank of Virginia… With the Rules and Regulations for the Government of the Bank. Richmond: J. Warrock in Wright et al. 2004, 2: 207–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, Jonathan Barron. 1988. “The Development of Corporate Financial Markets in Britain and the United States, 1600–1914: Overcoming Asymmetric Information.” Business History Review, 62: 199–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverely Family Papers. Virginia Historical Society. Richmond, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn, Howard. 2002. State Banking in Early America: A New Economic History. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cadman, John. 1949. The Corporation in New Jersey: Business and Politics, 1791–1875. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge, A. J. and Mansfield, J. B. 1859. A History and Description of New England: General and Local. 2 vols. Boston: Austin J. Coolidge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Joseph S. 1917. Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin Manufacturing. 1834. By-Laws of the Franklin Manufacturing Company of Richmond. Richmond: T. W. White in Wright et al. 2004, 2: 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedeman, Charles E. 1979. Joint-Stock Enterprise in France, 1807–1867: From Privileged Company to Modern Corporation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halifax Gas. 1840. Report of the Provisional Committee Appointed by the Stockholders of the Gas-Light and Water Company to Ascertain the Whole Cost of Erecting Gas Works for the Town of Halifax. Halifax: John Munro in Wright et al. 2004, 3:165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Samuel. 1801. To All Whom They May Concern, Stockholders As Well As Others. Washington: n.p. in Wright et al. 2004, 1:115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Ron. 2000. Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720–1844. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, Louis. 1948. Economic Policy and Democratic Thought: Pennsylvania, 1776–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Milton. 1954. Constructive Liberalism: The Role of the State in Economic Development in Georgia to 1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilt, Eric. 2009. “Rogue Finance: Life and Fire Insurance Company and the Panic of 1826.” Business History Review 83: 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilt, Eric and O’Banion, Katherine E. 2009. “The Limited Partnership in New York, 1822–1858: Partnerships Without Kinship.” Journal of Economic History 69: 615–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, Morton. 1977. Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, James Willard. 1970. The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States, 1780–1970. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Reverdy. 1834. Reply to a Pamphlet Entitled: “A Brief Exposition of Matters Relating to the Bank of Maryland.” Baltimore: J. Lucas and E. K. Deaver in Wright et al. 2004, 2: 75–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamensky, Jane. 2008. The Exchange Artist: A Tale of High-Flying Speculation and America’s First Banking Collapse. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, James. 1894 (first published 1826–30). Commentaries on American Law 4 vols. New York: Banks and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, William G. 1948. “Incorporation in New England: A Statistical Study, 1800–1975.” Journal of Economic History 8 (May), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, Charles P., and Aliber, Robert. 2005. Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. Fifth edition. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, Shepherd. 1855. Letter to the Stockholders of the Mechanics’ Bank from Shepherd Knapp in Reply to the Defence of Francis W. Edmonds, Their Late Cashier. New York: H. Anstice & Co., in Wright et al. 2004, 4: 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, Naomi. 1995. “Constructing Firms: Partnerships and Alternative Contractual Arrangements in Early-Nineteenth-Century American Business.” Business and Economic History 24: 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, Naomi. 2004. “Partnerships, Corporations, and the Limits on Contractual Freedom in U.S. History: An Essay in Economics, Law, and Culture,” in Kenneth LiPartito and David Sicilia, eds., Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, Naomi and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. 2005. “Legal Regime and Contractual Flexibility: A Comparison of Business’s Organizational Choices in France and the United States During the Era of Industrialization.” American Law and Economics Review 7:28–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, Naomi and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent.2006. “Corporate Governance and the Plight of Minority Shareholders in the United States Before the Great Depression,” in Edward Glaeser and Claudia Goldin, eds., Corruption and Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster and Schuylkill Bridge Company. 1814. Report of the Managers of the Lancaster and Schuylkill Bridge Company. Philadelphia: Office of the United States’ Gazette in Wright et al. 2004, 1: 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livermore, Shaw. 1939. Early American Land Companies: Their Influence on Corporate Development. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine. 1849. Documents Printed by the Order of the Legislature of the State of Maine During Its Session A. D. 1849. Augusta: William T. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts. 1815. An Act to Incorporate the President, Directors, and Company of the Dedham Bank. Dedham: Gazette Office in Wright et al. 2004, 1:403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York and Boston Railroad Company. 1850. Address of the Board of Directors of the New York and Boston Railroad Company to the Stockholders and Friends of the Road. Middletown, Conn.: n.p. in Wright et al. 2004, 4: 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Thomas. 1991. The Corporation Under Russian Law, 1800–1917: A Study in Tsarist Economic Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Philadelphia and Reading Rail Road Company. 1846. Report of a Committee of Investigation into the Affairs of the Philadelphia and Reading Rail Road Company. Boston: Eastburn’s Press in Wright et al. 2004, 3: 379–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poultney, Evan. 1834. A Brief Exposition of Matters Relating to the Bank of Maryland. United States: n.p. in Wright et al. 2004, 2: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuylkill Permanent Bridge Company. 1807. To the Stockholders of the Schuylkill Permanent Bridge Company. Philadelphia: n.p. in Wright et al. 2004, 1: 155–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigourney, Charles. 1837. To the Stockholders of the Phoenix Bank. Hartford: Case, Tiffany & Co. in Wright et al. 2004, 3: 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Robert. 2009. Don’t Blame the Shorts: Why Short Sellers Are Always Blamed for Market Crashes and How History Is Repeating Itself. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T Cadell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Canal and Rail Road Company. 1828. By-Laws of the South Carolina Canal and Rail Road Company. Charleston: James S. Burges in Wright et al. 2004, 2: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, Richard. 2005. “Comment,” in Randall K. Morck, ed., A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, Richard. 2009. “Comparing the UK and US financial systems, 1790–1830,” in J. Atack and L. Neal, eds., The Origin and Development of Financial Markets and Institutions, From the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, Richard, Wilson, Jack, and Wright, Robert E. 2004. “America’s First Securities Markets, 1787–1836: Emergence, Development, Integration.” National Science Foundation, Grant no. SES-9730692. Data available at: http://eh.net/databases/early-us-securities-prices.

  • Sylla, Richard and Wright, Robert E. 2009. “U.S. Corporate Development, 1801–1860.” NSF Grant No. 0751577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, George. 1833. Effect of Incorporated Coal Companies Upon the Anthracite Coal Trade. Pottsville: Benjamin Bannan in Wright et al. 2004, 2: 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, Horst. 1960. “Statistische Materialien zur Konzessionierung von Aktiengesellschaften in Preussen bis 1867.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, No. 2, 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginian. 1847. A Letter Addressed to Those Capitalists of Boston Who Are Invited to Take Stock in Purchasing and Reviving the Portsmouth and Roanoke Railroad in Virginia. Boston: Samuel N. Dickinson in Wright et al. 2004, 4:85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Mutual Assurance Company of the City of New York. 1809. The Washington Mutual Assurance Company of the City of New York: Charter, Bye-Laws, and Rates of Insurance. New York: T. and J. Swords in Wright et al. 2004, 1:163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • West Virginia Iron Mining. 1837. Prospectus of the West Virginia Iron Mining and Manufacturing Company. Richmond: n.p. in Wright et al. 2004, 3: 133–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E. 2002a. Hamilton Unbound: Finance and the Creation of the American Republic. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E. 2002b. Wealth of Nations Rediscovered: Integration and Expansion in American financial Markets, 1780–1850. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E. 2005. The First Wall Street: Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, and the Birth of American Finance. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E. 2008. One Nation Under Debt: Hamilton, Jefferson, and the History of What We Owe. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E. 2009. “Corporations and the Economic Growth and Development of the Antebellum Ohio River Valley.” Ohio Valley History 9 (Winter): 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E., Barber, Wray, Crafton, Matthew, and Jain, Anand, eds. 2004. History of Corporate Governance: The Importance of Stakeholder Activism. 6 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Robert E. and Cowen, David J. 2006. Financial Founding Fathers: The Men Who Made America Rich. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Jonathan GS Koppell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, R.E., Sylla, R. (2011). Corporate Governance and Stockholder/Stakeholder Activism in the United States, 1790–1860: New Data and Perspectives. In: Koppell, J.G.S. (eds) Origins of Shareholder Advocacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116665_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics