Skip to main content
Log in

The Comparative Set Fallacy

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues for the validity of inferences that take the form of: A is more X than B; therefore A and B are both X. After considering representative counterexamples, it is claimed that these inferences are valid if and only if the comparative terms in the inference are taken from no more than one comparative set, where a comparative set is understood to be comprised of a positive, comparative, and superlative, represented as {X, more X than, most X}. In all instances where arguments appearing to be of this form are invalid, it is the case that the argument has fallaciously taken terms from more than one comparative set. The fallacy of appealing to more than one comparative set in an inference involving comparative terms is shown to be analogous to the fallacy of equivocation in argumentation. The paper concludes by suggesting a conflation of logical issues with grammatical issues is the core difficulty leading some to consider inferences in the form of A is more X than B; therefore A and B are X to be invalid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, E.: 1993, ‘Formalizing the Logic of Positive, Comparative, and Superlative’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34, 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Jonathan Barnes, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W.: 1870, The English Language in its Elements and Forms with a History of its Origin and Development, Harper & Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, I.: 1970, English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, H.: 1920, Greek Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, John: 1972, ‘Positive, Comparative, Superlative’ The Journal of Philosophy 69, 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dougherty, M.V. The Comparative Set Fallacy. Argumentation 18, 213–222 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024022.45061.c7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024022.45061.c7

Navigation