Abstract
Ryle (1949, Chapter V) discusses a range of predicates which in different ways exemplify a property I shall call quasi-duality – they appear to report two actions or events in one predicate. Quasi-duality is the key property of predicates Ryle classed as achievements. Ryle's criteria for classification were not temporal or aspectual, and Vendler's subsequent adoption of the term achievement for the aktionsart of momentary events changes the term – Rylean achievements and Vendlerian achievements are in principle different classes. Nevertheless, I shall argue in this paper that certain kinds of quasi-duality do have aspectual significance.
This paper examines a number of quasi-dual predicates which are not generally discussed in the aktionsart literature, includingbreak a promise, miscount, and cure the patient. Two types of quasi-dual predicates are identified and dubbed criterion predicates and causative upshot predicates. It is shown that both types of quasi-dual predicate lack process progressives, despite being durative, and it is argued that the lack of process progressives identifies these predicates as (aspectual) achievements. They are termed durative achievements to distinguish them from canonical, momentary achievements.
It is argued that these predicates lack process progressives, and hence are achievements, because they express individual-level predicates on the event argument. A process progressive is stage-level for the event, and hence is incompatible with a predicate which is lexically individual-level for the event.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Asher, Nicholas: 1992, ‘A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 463–508.
Austin, J. L.: 1962/1975, in J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa (eds.), How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Bennett, Jonathan: 1994, ‘The “Namely” Analysis of the “By”-Locution’, Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 29–51.
Bennett, M. and B. H. Partee: 1978, ‘Towards the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English’, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Bonomi, Andrea: 1997, ‘The Progressive and the Structure of Events’, Journal of Semantics 14, 173–205.
Brentano, Franz: 1973, Psychology from an Empirical Point of View, translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister from Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (1874, 1924), Sections V–IX.
Buyssens, E.: 1968, Les Deux Aspectifs de la Conjugaison Anglaise au XXe Siècle, Presses Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels.
Carlson, Gregory N.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Carlson, Gregory and Francis Pelletier (eds.): 1995, The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Chomsky, Noam: 1975, ‘Questions of Form and Interpretation’, Linguistic Analysis 1, 75–109.
Dowty, David: 1977, ‘Toward a Semantic Analysis of Verb Aspect and the English “Imperfective” Progressive’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 45–77.
Eckardt, Regine: 1998, Adverbs, Events, and Other Things, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
Jespersen, Otto: 1932, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Kearns, Kate: 1988, ‘Light Verbs in English’, manuscript, MIT.
Kearns, Kate: 1998, ‘Extraction from Make the Claim Constructions’, Journal of Linguistics 34, 53–72.
Kenny, Anthony: 1963, Action, Emotion and Will, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
König, Ekkehard: 1980, ‘On the Context-Dependence of the Progressive in English’, in Christian Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification, pp. 269–291, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tuebingen.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1988/1995, in Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier (eds.), Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates, pp. 125–175.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffrey Pelletier, Gregory C. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link, and Gennaro Chierchia: 1995, ‘Genericity: An Introduction’, in Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier (eds.), pp. 1–124.
Kuroda, S.-Y.: 1972, ‘The Categorical and the Thetic Judgment’, Foundations of Language 9, 153–185.
Kuroda, S.-Y.: 1992, Japanese Syntax and Semantics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Ladusaw, William: 1994, ‘Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong’, in Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV (SALT IV), pp. 220–229, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Lascarides, Alex: 1991, ‘The Progressive and the Imperfective Paradox’, Synthese 87, 401–447.
Milsark, G.: 1977, ‘Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities in the Existential Construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–30.
Mittwoch, Anita: 1988, ‘Aspects of English Aspect: On the Interaction of Perfect, Progressive and Durational Phrases’, Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 203–254.
Mittwoch, Anita: 1991, ‘In Defence of Vendler's Achievements’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6, 71–85.
Mittwoch, Anita: 1998, ‘Cognate Objects as Reflections of Davidsonian Event Arguments,’ in Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 309–332, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Moens, Marc: 1987/2001, Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference, Ph.D. dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, revised text.
Moltmann, Frederike: 1991, ‘Measure Adverbials’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 629–660.
Parsons, Terence: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Piñòn, Christopher: 1997, ‘Achievements in an Event Semantics’, in Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII (SALT VII), pp. 276–293, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Piñòn, Christopher: 1999, ‘Durative Adverbials for Result States’, in S. Bird, A. Carnie, J, Haugen, and P. Norquest (eds.), WCCFL 18 Proceedings, pp. 420–433, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.
Portner, Paul: 1998, ‘The Progressive in Modal Semantics’, Language 74, 760–787.
Ramchand, Gillian: 1997, Aspect and Predication, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Ryle, Gilbert: 1949/1963, The Concept of Mind, Penguin/Peregrine Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
Taylor, Barry: 1977, ‘Tense and Continuity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 199–220.
Vendler, Zeno: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Zucchi, Sandro and Michael White: 1996, ‘Twigs, Sequences and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates’, in Teresa Galloway and Justin Spence (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VI (SALT VI), pp. 329–346, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kearns, K. Durative Achievements and Individual-Level Predicates on Events. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 595–635 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025803912153
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025803912153