Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular and other biological evidence supports the recognition of at least three species of brown kiwi

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of morphologically crypticlineages within the threatened brown kiwi ofNew Zealand has confounded their taxonomy. Recent genetic studies (Herbert and Daugherty1994; Baker et al. 1995) revealed that atleast two phylogenetic species exist within thebrown kiwi, and suggested that further researchshould resolve the taxonomic problems. In thispaper we extend genetic analyses to includesequences from 58 brown kiwi representing fivephylogenetic lineages for four mitochondrialloci (control region, cytochrome b,ATPase 6 and ATPase 8). Major lineages ofbrown kiwi are shown to be reciprocallymonophyletic, and align with other biologicaldifferences in the ecology, behavior,morphology and parasites of kiwi. BecausemtDNA sequences of major lineages of kiwi arenot evolving in a clocklike manner, we used anew penalized likelihood method withrate-smoothing to date the divergence of NorthIsland brown kiwi and the geographicallyisolated Okarito population (rowi) at about 6.2Mya. These lineages diverged about 8.2 Myafrom the brown kiwi in Fiordland and Haast inthe southern part of the South Island, and arethus older than the species of spotted kiwi(5.8 Mya). Given their distinctness, long-termgeographical isolation, lack of hybridizationin introduced populations, and accumulation ofnew biological characters within theselineages, we hypothesize that reproductiveincompatibilities have probably arisen as well. We therefore recommend that these divergentlineages be formally recognized as fullspecies; Apteryx mantelli should bere-instated for the North Island brown kiwi,A. australis should be restricted to thetokoeka, and a new species A. rowiishould be erected to describe the rowi atOkarito. Tokoeka should be split into at leastthree conservation management units (Haast,Fiordland and Stewart Island [Rakiura]), butfurther research is required to determine theexact relationships and status of theselineages. Further investigation is alsorequired into the genetic structuring of theNorth Island brown kiwi to confirm conservationmanagement units on the North Island.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allibone RM, Crowl TA, Holmes JM, King TM, McDowall RM, Townsend CR, Wallis GP (1996) Isozyme analysis of Galaxias species (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) from the Taieri River, South Island, New Zealand: A species complex revealed. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 57, 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC (1989) A Role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends Ecol. Evol., 4, 279–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC, Nelson WS (1989) Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct dusky seaside sparrow. Science 243, 646–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AJ, Daugherty CH, Colbourne R, McLennan JL (1995) Flightless brown kiwi of New Zealand possess extremely subdivided population structure and cryptic species like small mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 92, 8254–8258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett AD (1850) On the genus Apteryx. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1850, 274–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles WE (1992) Revision of Dromaius gidju Patterson and Rich 1987 from Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland, Australia with a reassessment of it generic position. Nat. Hist. Mus. LA County Sci. Ser., 36, 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller WL (1882) Manual of the Birds of New Zealand. Government Printer, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller (1891) On the large kiwi from Stewart Island (Apteryx maxima). Trans. Proc. NZ Inst., 24, 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller (1896) Notes on the ornithology of New Zealand. Trans. Proc. NZ Inst., 29, 179–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, McLennan J (1991) Kiwi Recovery Plan. Department of Conservation, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabot E, Beckenback AT (1985) Simultaneous editing of multiple nucleic acid and protein sequences with ESEE. Comp. App. Bios., 5, 233–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Adachi J, Pääbo S, Heasegawa M (1994) Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: Instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol., 39, 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B, Lande R (1982) Morphological stasis and developmental constraint: No problem for Neo-Darwinism. Nature, 296, 610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A, Lalueza-Fox C, Anderson S, Rambaut A, Austin J, Ward R (2001) Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature, 409, 704–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr. Ornithol., 1, 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty CH, Patterson GB, Thorn CJ, French DC (1990) Differentiation of the members of the New Zealand Leiolopisma nigriplantare species complex (Lacertilla: Scincidae). Herp. Mon., 4, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean AD, Greenwald JE (1995) Use of filtered pipet tips to elute DNA from agarose gels. BioTechniques, 18, 980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen VL, Baker AJ, Piatt JF (1996) Phylogenetic relationships within the Alcidae (Charadriiformes: Aves) inferred from total molecular evidence. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddrath O, Baker AJ (2001) Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268, 939–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall T (1997) BioEdit 4.8.8. North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heather BD, Robertson HA (2000) The Field Guide to the Birds of New Zealand, revised edn. Viking, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert J, Daugherty CH (1994) Genetic Variation, Systematics and Management of Kiwi. Unpub. report. Department of Conservation, Wellington.

  • Hitchmough R (1997) A Systematic Revision of the New Zealand Gekkonidae. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM (1993) Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol., 42, 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton FW, Drummond J (1904) The Animals of New Zealand. Whitcombe and Tombs, Christchurch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly JN (1989) A Field study of the breeding biology of the little spotted kiwi (Apteryx owenii) with emphasis on the causes of nest failures. J. Roy. Soc. NZ, 19, 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1981) Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78, 454–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Hanner R (1998) Cryptic species in a “living fossil” lineage: Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lepidurus (Crustacea: Notostraca) in North America. Mol. Phyl. Evol., 10, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Pääbo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 6196–6200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Bioinfor, 17, 1244–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews GM (1927) Systema Avium Australasianarum. British Ornithologists' Union, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews GM (1931) A List of the Birds of Australasia (Including New Zealand, Lord Howe and Norfolk Island and the Australasian Antarctic Quadrant). Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan J, McCann T (1989) Incubation by female great spotted kiwis. Notornis, 36, 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan J, McCann T (1991) Incubation temperatures of great spotted kiwi, Apteryx haastii. NZ J. Ecol., 15, 163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionary Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 373–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver WRB (1930) New Zealand Birds. Fine Art, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver WRB (1955) New Zealand Birds, 2nd edn. AH and AWReed, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RDM, Holmes EC (1998) Molecular Evolution a Phylogenetic Approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts TH (1872) Trans Proc. NZ Inst., 5, 171–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo CAM, Takezaki N, Nei M (1996) Efficiences of different genes and different tree-building methods in recoverying known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, 525–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson MJ (2001) R8S, Version 1.01 (beta) Users'Manual. University of California, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturmbauer C, Meyer A (1992) Genetic divergence, speciation and morphological stasis in a lineage of African cichlid fishes. Nature, 358, 578–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1998) PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and other Methods. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 10, 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall C (1994) Setting Priorities for the Conservation of New Zealand Threatened Plants and Animals. Department of Conservation, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewick SA, Wallis GP, Morgan-Richards M (2000) Phylogeographic pattern correlates with Pliocene mountain building in the alpine scree weta (Orthoptera, Anostostomatidae). Mol. Ecol., 9, 657–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters JM, Wallis GP (2000) Across the Southern Alps by river capture? Freshwater fish phylogeography in South Island, New Zealand. Mol. Ecol., 9, 1577–1582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2000) Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML), Version 3.0. University College London, London, England (http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryann L. Burbidge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burbidge, M.L., Colbourne, R.M., Robertson, H.A. et al. Molecular and other biological evidence supports the recognition of at least three species of brown kiwi. Conservation Genetics 4, 167–177 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023386506067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023386506067

Navigation