Skip to main content
Log in

Negation And Negative Concord In Romance

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the two interpretations that a combination ofnegative indefinites can get in concord languages like French:a concord reading, which amounts to a single negation, and a doublenegation reading. We develop an analysis within a polyadic framework,where a sequence of negative indefinites can be interpreted as aniteration of quantifiers or via resumption. The first option leadsto a scopal relation, interpreted as double negation. The secondoption leads to the construction of a polyadic negative quantifiercorresponding to the concord reading. Given that sentential negationparticipates in negative concord, we develop an extension of thepolyadic approach which can deal with non-variable binding operators,treating the contribution of negation in a concord context assemantically empty. Our semantic analysis, incorporated into agrammatical analysis formulated in HPSG, crucially relies on theassumption that quantifiers can be combined in more than one wayupon retrieval from the quantifier store. We also considercross-linguistic variation regarding the participation ofsentential negation in negative concord.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abeillé, Anne and Danièle Godard: 1997, ‘The Syntax of French Negative Adverbs’, in Paul Hirschbuhler and F. Martineau (eds), Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo and Tim Stowell: 1997, ‘Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every’ in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 71–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, Johan: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, Johan: 1989, ‘Polyadic Quantifiers’ Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 437–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, Gosse, Robert Malouf, and Ivan A. Sag: 2001, ‘Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction, Parts I and II’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(1), 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corblin, Francis: 1996, ‘Multiple Negation Processing in Natural Language’ Theoria 17, 214–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corblin, Francis and Ivan Derzhansky: 1997, ‘Multiple Negation, Optional Arguments and the Reification of Eventualities’, in Francis Corblin, Danièle Godard and Jean-Marie Marandin (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, Peter Lang, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Anthony: 2001, Linking by Types in the Hierarchical Lexicon, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déprez, Viviane: 1997, ‘Two Types of Negative Concord’ Probus 9, 103–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déprez, Viviane: 2000, ‘Parallel (A)symmetries and the Internal Structure of Negative Expressions’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 253–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donka and Anastasia Giannikidou: 1995, ‘How Clause-Bounded is the Scope of Universals’ Proceedings of SALT VI, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannikidou, Anastasia: 1998, Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannikidou, Anastasia: 2000, ‘Negative ...concord’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 457–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag: 2000, English Interrogative Constructions, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevisse, Maurice: 1993, Le Bon Usage (13th revised edition), Duculot, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, Liliane: 1995, The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, Liliane and Rafaella Zanuttini: 1996, ‘Negative Concord in West Flemish’ in Andrea Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 117–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James and Robert May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’ The Linguistic Review 1, 41–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1917, ‘Negation in English and Other Languages’ Reprinted in Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen (1962), George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 3–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael Allan: 1993, Sardinian Syntax, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, Robert: ????, ‘The Semantics of Recursive Modification’ unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.

  • Kayne, Richard: 1981, ‘ECP-Extensions’ Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward: 1987, ‘Unreducible n-ary Quantifiers in Natural Language’ in Peter Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 109–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward: 1992, ‘Beyond the Frege Boundary’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward and Dag Westerståhl: 1997, ‘Generalized Quantifiers in Linguistics and Logic’, in Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 837–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jongbok and Ivan A. Sag: 1995, ‘The Parametric Variation of English and French Negation’ in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jongbok and Ivan A. Sag: in press, ‘Negation without Head Movement’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.

  • Ladusaw, William: 1992, ‘Expressing Negation’ Proceedings of SALT 2, The Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka Mugarza, Itziar: 1990, Negation in Syntax, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Laka Mugarza, Itziar: 1993, ‘Negative Fronting in Romance’ in William Ashby (ed.), Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 315–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, P.: 1966, ‘First Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers’ Theoria 35: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F.-H.: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.

  • Manning, Christopher and Ivan A. Sag: 1998, ‘Argument Structure, Valence, and Binding’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 21, 107–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Christopher, Ivan A. Sag, and Masayo Iida: 1999, ‘The Lexical Integrity of Japanese Causatives’ in Robert Levine and Georgia Green (eds.), Readings in Modern Phrase Structure Grammar, Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–70.

  • May, Robert: 1989, ‘Interpreting Logical Form’ Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 387–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike: 1995, ‘Exception Sentences and Polyadic Quantification’ Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 223–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike: 1996, ‘Resumptive Quantifiers in Exception Sentences’ in Makoto Kanazawa, Chris Piñón, and Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Quantifiers, Deduction, and Context, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Claude: 1991, La Négation en Français, Droz, Genève.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag: 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Eun Jung Yoo: 1998, ‘A Unified Theory of Scope for Quantifiers and wh-Phrases’ Journal of Linguistics.

  • Przepiórkowski, Adam: 1999, Case Assignment and the Complement-Adjunct Dichotomy: A Non-Configurational Constraint-Based Approach, Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przepiórkowski, Adam and Anna Kupść: 1999, ‘Eventuality Negation and Negative Concord in Polish and Italian’ in R. Borsley and A. Przepiórkowski (eds.), Slavic in HPSG, Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, Frank and Manfred Sailer: 1999, ‘A Lexicalist Collocation Analysis of Sentential Negation and Negative Concord in French’ Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Universität Tübingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan A. and Thomas Wasow: 1999, Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction, CSLI Publications, Stanford. Distributed by Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, Henriëtte: 1998, ‘La Position de ni dans le système de la négation’ in Denis Delfitto, Jan Schroten, and Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Recherches de Linguistique Française et Romane, Vol. 17, UiL-OTS/Romance Languages, Utrecht, pp. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, Henriëtte: 1998, ‘Licensing of Negative Polarity Items under Inverse Scope’ Lingua 105, 175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, Henriëtte: 2001, ‘Négation et coordination: la conjonction ni’, in Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bob de Jonge, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, and Arie Molendijk (eds.), Adverbial Modification, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997, ‘Strategies for Scope Taking’ in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 109–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallduví Enric: 1994, ‘Polarity items, n-Words and Minimizers in Catalan and Spanish’ Probus 6, 263–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, Dag: 1989, ‘Quantifiers in Formal and Natural Languages’ in Dov Gabbay and Frantz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 4, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wouden, Ton: 1997, Negative Contexts. Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wouden, Ton and Frans Zwarts: 1993, ‘A Semantic Analysis of Negative Concord’ Proceedings of SALT 3, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wouden, Ton: 1994, Negative Contexts, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Warner, Anthony: 1993, English Auxiliaries: Structure and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Anthony: 2000, ‘English Auxiliaries without Lexical Rules’ in Robert Borsley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 32: The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories, Academic Press, San Diego and London, pp. 167–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, Rafaella: 1991, Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation, Doctoral dissertaton, University of Pennsylvania.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Swart, H., Sag, I.A. Negation And Negative Concord In Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 373–417 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020823106639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020823106639

Navigation