Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

While mereotopology – the theory of boundaries, contact and separation built up on a mereological foundation – has found fruitful applications in the realm of qualitative spatial reasoning, it faces problems when its methods are extended to deal with those varieties of spatial and non-spatial reasoning which involve a factor of granularity. This is because granularity cannot easily be represented within a mereology-based framework. We sketch how this problem can be solved by means of a theory of granular partitions, a theory general enough to comprehend not only the familiar sorts of spatial partitions but also a range of coarse-grained partitions of other, non-spatial sorts. We then show how these same methods can be extended to apply to finite sequences of granular partitions evolving over time, or to what we shall call coarse- and fine-grained histories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Bettini, X.S. Wang and S. Jajodia, A general framework for time granularity and its application to temporal reasoning, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 22(1/2) (1998) 29-58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Bittner, A qualitative coordinate language of location of figures within the ground, in: Spatial Information Theory-A Theoretical Basis for GIS, COSIT'97, Laurel Highlands, PA, eds. S. Hirtle and A.U. Frank, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2205 (Springer, Berlin/New York, 1997) pp. 223-240.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Bittner and B. Smith, A taxonomy of granular partitions, in: Spatial Information Theory, COSIT '01, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin/New, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Bittner and J.G. Stell, A boundary-sensitive approach to qualitative location, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 24 (1998) 93-114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Bub, Interpreting the Quantum World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Cantor, Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre, Mathematische Annalen 47 (1895) 481-512; 49 (1897) 207-246.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Casati and A.C. Varzi, Parts and Places (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.G. Cohn and M. Gotts, N. The 'egg-yolk' representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries, in: Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, eds. P. Burrough and A.U. Frank, GISDATA Series II (Taylor and Francis, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Erwig and M. Schneider, The honeycomb model of spatio-temporal partitions, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Database Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1678 (Springer, Berlin, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Freksa and T. Barkowsky, On the relation between spatial concepts and geographic objects, in: Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, eds. P. Burrough and A.U. Frank (Taylor and Francis, 1994).

  11. A. Galton, The mereotopology of discrete space, in: Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1661 (Springer, Berlin/New York, 1999) pp. 251-266.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Gell-Mann and J.B. Hartle, Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, eds. S. Kobayashi et al. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Gell-Mann and J.B. Hartle, Classical equations for quantum systems, Physical Review A (1993).

  14. R. Griffiths, Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics, Journal of Statistical Physics 36 (1984) 219-272.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Griffiths, The consistency of consistent histories, Foundations of Physics 23 (1993) 1601-1610.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Guarino and C. Welty, Ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships, in: Proceedings of ER-2000: The 19th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, eds. A. Laender and V. Storey, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin/New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Lewis, Parts of Classes (Blackwell, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.M. Mark, Topological properties of geographic surfaces: applications in computer cartography, in: Harvard Papers on Geographic Information Systems, Vol. 5, Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.G. Millikan, A common structure for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: more mama, more milk, and more mouse, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9(1) (1998) 55-100.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Omnès, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Omnès, Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Simons, Parts, a Study in Ontology (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Smith, Relevance, relatedness and restricted set theory, in: Advances in Scientific Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Paul Weingartner, eds. G. Schurz and G.J.W. Dorn (Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, 1991) pp. 45-56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. Smith, Fiat objects, Topoi 20(2) (2001).

  25. B. Smith and B. Brogaard, A unified theory of truth and reference, Logique et Analyse, forthcoming.

  26. J.G. Stell, Granulation for graphs, in: Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, eds. C. Freksa and D.M. Mark, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1661 (Springer, Berlin/New York, 1999) pp. 417-432.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.G. Stell, The representation of discrete multi-resolution spatial knowledge, in: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference (KR2000), eds. A.G. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia and B. Selman (Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 2000) pp. 38-49.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.G. Stell and M.F. Worboys, Generalizing graphs using amalgamation and selection, in: Advances in Spatial Databases, Proceedings, eds. D. Papadial et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science,Vol. 1651 (Springer, Berlin/New York, 1999) pp. 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, B., Brogaard, B. Quantum Mereotopology. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 36, 153–175 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015860121607

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015860121607

Navigation