Skip to main content
Log in

Conventions in Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventionalistic aspects of physical world perception are reviewed with an emphasis on the constancy of the speed of light in relativity theory and the irreversibility of measurements in quantum mechanics. An appendix contains a complete proof of Alexandrov's theorem using mainly methods of affine geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. W. Bridgman, The Logic of Modern Physics (New York, 1927).

  2. P. W. Bridgman, “A physicists second reaction to Mengenlehre,” Scripta Mathematica 2, 101–117, 224–234 (1934). Cf. R. Landauer.(36)

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. W. Bridgman, The Nature of Physical Theory (Princeton, 1936).

  4. P. W. Bridgman, Reflections of a Physicist (Philosophical Library, New York, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. W. Bridgman, The Nature of Some of Our Physical Concepts (Philosophical Library, New York, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arthur I. Miller, Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (Springer, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albert Einstein, “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper,” Ann. Phys. 17, 891–921 (1905). English translation in the Appendix of Ref. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Malament, “Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaniety,” Noûs 11, 293–300 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michael Redhead, “The conventionality of simultaneity,” in Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds, J. Earman, A. Janis, G. Massey, and N. Rescher, eds. (University of Pittsburgh Press and Universitätsverlag Konstanz, Pittsburgh and Konstanz, 1993), pp. 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Allen I. Janis, “Conventionality of simultaneity,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 1998 Edition. (The Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information, Ventura Hall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4115, 1998, Internet address: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-convensimul/.)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karl Svozil, “Relativizing relativity,” Found. Phys. 30(7), 1001–1016 (2000); e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0001064.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Asher Peres, “Defining length,” Nature 312, 10 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. J. Boskovich, De spacio et tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur (Vienna, 1755); English translation in Ref. 37.

  14. George F. FitzGerald, in The Scientific Writings of the Late George Francis FitzGerald, J. Larmor, ed. (Dublin, 1902).

  15. John S. Bell, “How to teach special relativity,” Progress in Scientific Culture 1(2) (1976). Reprinted in Ref. 38, pp. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  16. John S. Bell, “George Francis FitzGerald,” Physics World 5(9), 31–35, September 1992; abridged version by Denis Weaire.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. D. Alexandrov, “On Lorentz transformations,” Uspehi Mat. Nauk. 5(3), 187 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. D. Alexandrov, “A contribution to chronogeometry,” Can. J. Math. 19, 1119–1128 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. D. Alexandrov, “Mappings of spaces with families of cones and space-time transformations,” Annali die Matematica Pura ed Applicata 103, 229–257 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. D. Alexandrov, “On the principles of relativity theory,” in Classics of Soviet Mathemotics, Volume 4, A. D. Alexandrov. Selected Works, pp. 289–318 (1996).

  21. H. J. Borchers and G. C. Hegerfeldt, “The structure of space-time transformations,” Comm. Math. Phys. 28, 259–266 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walter Benz, Geometrische Transformationen (BI Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. June A. Lester, “Distance preserving transformations,” in Handbook of Incidence Geometry, Francis Buekenhout, ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karl Svozil, “Connections between deviations from Lorentz transformation and relativistic energy-momentum relation,” Europhysics Lett. 2, 83–85 (1986), excerpts from Ref. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karl Svozil, “Operational perception of space-time coordinates in a quantum medium,” Nuovo Cimento 96B, 127–139 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karl Svozil, “Quantum interfaces,” in Sciences of the Interface (Genista Verlag, Tübingen, Germany, 2001) pp. 76–88; e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0001064.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Daniel B. Greenberger and A. YaSin, “‘Haunted’ measurements in quantum theory,” Found. Phys. 19(6), 679–704 ( 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Daniel M. Greenberger, Solar Eclipse Workshop, Vienna, August 1999.

  29. Thomas J. Herzog, Paul G. Kwiat, Harald Weinfurter, and Anton Zeilinger, “Complementarity and the quantum eraser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 75(17), 3034–3037 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Niko Donath and Karl Svozil, “Finding a state in a haystack,” arXiv:quant-ph/ 0105046 (2001).

  31. Erwin Schrödinger, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,” Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812, 823–828, 844–849 (1935). English translation in Refs. 40 and 41, pp. 152–167; a copy can be found at www.emr.hibu.no/lars/eng/cat/.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Josef Gruska, Quantum Computing (McGraw-Hill, London, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  34. K. W. Gruenberg and A. J. Weir, Linear Geometry, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hans Havlicek, private communication.

  36. Rolf Landauer, “Advertisement for a paper I like,” in On Limits, John L. Casti and J. F. Traub, eds. (Santa Fe Institute Report 94-10-056, Santa Fe, NM, 1994), p. 39.

  37. R. J. Boskovich, “De spacio et tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur,” in A Theory of Natural Philosophy, J. M. Child, ed. (Open Court (1922) and MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1966), pp. 203–205.

    Google Scholar 

  38. John S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Karl Svozil, “On the setting of scales for space and time in arbitrary quantized media,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory preprint, LBL-16097, May 1983.

  40. J. D. Trimmer, “The present situation in quantum mechanics: a translation of Schrödinger's “cat paradox,” Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 124, 323–338 (1980); reprinted in Ref. 41, pp. 152–167.

    Google Scholar 

  41. John A. Wheeler and Wojciech H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svozil, K. Conventions in Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 32, 479–502 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015017831247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015017831247

Navigation