Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric tolerance verification using superquadrics

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

Standards for Geometric Tolerance Verification such as ANSI Y14.5 have been in practice for many years. These standards were developed for hard gage technology, and provide little guidance for how tolerances should be verified for flexible technologies such as coordinate measuring machines or laser scanners. As a result, most techniques used in practice do not make use of proper statistical analysis of results. We present a statistically-based technique using jackknifing for geometric tolerance verification. The techniques are constructed for the superquadric parametric model representation, but are applicable to any parametric representation. The techniques are illustrated by examples, and a simulation study is provided for comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (1994) American National Standard Engineering Drawings & Related Documentation Practice, Dimensioning & Tolerancing, ANSI Y14.5M-1994, ASME, New York.

  • Bárcenas, C.C. (1998) Geometric tolerance verification using super-quadrics. Ph.D. thesis, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bárcenas, C.C. and Griffin, P.M. (2000) Parametric-based determination of cylindrical variations in geometric tolerancing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 122(3), 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bárcenas, C.C., Griffin, P.M. and Heikes, R. (1999). Statistical comparison of sampling and fitting procedures for geometric tolerance verification. Tech Report 829, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A. (1981) Superquadrics and angle preserving transformations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caskey, G., Hari, Y., Hocken, R., Palanivelu, D., Rava, J., Wilson, J., Chen, R., Chen, K. and Yang, J. (1990) Sampling techniques for coordinate measuring machines. in Proceedings of the Design and Manufacturing System Conference, American Society of Precision Engineering, Rochester, NY, pp. 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, W., Kurfess, T.R. and Cagan, J. (1998) Sampling uncertainty in coordinate measurement data analysis. Precision Engineering, 22(3), 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M.M., Griffin, P.M., Tsui, K.L. and Zhou, C. (1995) A comparison of the orthogonal least squares and minimum enclosing zone methods for form error estimation. Manufacturing Review, 8(2), 120–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M.M., Griffin, P.M., Tsui, K.L. and Zhou, C. (1997) Statistical issues in geometric feature inspection using coordinate measuring machines. Technometrics, 39, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T., Hinkley, D. and Larntz, K. (1980) Jackknifing in nonlinear regression. Technometrics, 22(1), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. and Messimer, S. (1992) Object pose determination from range data. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 22(3), 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, T.H. (1993) Computational metrology. Manufacturing Review, 6(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.-S., Vaghese, P. and Zhang, C. (1997) Statistical tolerance analysis based on beta distributions. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 16(2), 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.-S., Vaghese, P., Zhang, C. and Wang, H.-P. (1995) A comparative analysis of CMM form-fitting algorithms. Manufacturing Review, 8(1), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, D.W. (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 11, 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, T.S.R. and Abdin, S.Z. (1980) Minimum zone evaluation of surfaces. International Journal of Machine Tool Design Research, 20, 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. (1981) Robot Manipulators, MIT Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, A.P. (1986) Perceptual organization and the representation of natural forms. Artificial Intelligence, 28(2), 293–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G.A.F. and Wild, C.J. (1989) Nonlinear Regression, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shunian, Y., Zhu, L. and Guangying, L. (1988) Statistical inference of form error distribution function. Precision Engineering, 10(2), 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solina F. and Bajcsy, R. (1990) Recovery of parametric models from range images: the case for superquadrics with global deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(2), 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traband, M.T., Joshi, S., Wysk, R. and Cavalier, T. (1989) Evaluation of straightness and flatness tolerances using the minimum zone. Manufacturing Review, 2(3), 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bárcenas, C.C., Griffin, P.M. Geometric tolerance verification using superquadrics. IIE Transactions 33, 1109–1119 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010974704308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010974704308

Keywords

Navigation