Abstract
In this paper I examine and reply to a deflationary challenge brought against virtue ethics. The challenge comes from critics who are impressed by recent psychological evidence suggesting that much of what we take to be virtuous conduct is in fact elicited by narrowly specific social settings, as opposed to being the manifestation of robust individual character. In answer to the challenge, I suggest a conception of virtue that openly acknowledges the likelihood of its deep, ongoing dependence upon particular social relationships and settings. I argue that holding this conception will indeed cause problems for some important strands of thought in virtue ethics, most notably in the tradition of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. But an approach to virtue ethics modeled on David Hume's treatment of virtue and character in A Treatise of Human Nature promises to escape these problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Annas, J., Virtue and Eudaimonism, Social Philosophy and Policy 15(1) (1998), pp. 37–55.
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, tr. David Ross, revised by J.L. Ackrill and J.O. Urmson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Badhwar, N.K., The Limited Unity of Virtue, Nous 30(3) (1996), pp. 306–329.
Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1986.
Cantor, N., and Kihlstrom, J.F., Personality and Social Intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Prentice Hall, 1987.
Crisp, R., Modern Moral Philosophy and the Virtues, in R. Crisp (ed.), How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 1–18.
Darley, J.M., and Batson, C.D., From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27(1) (1973), pp. 100–108.
Doris, J.M., Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics, Nous 32 (1998), pp. 504–530.
Driver, J., The Virtues and Human Nature, in R. Crisp (ed.) How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 111–129.
Flanagan, O., Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.
Harman, G., Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error, in Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 99 (1998-99), pp. 315–331.
Hume, D., in L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), A Treatise of Human Nature, 1739-40, 2nd Ed. revised by P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1978.
Isen, A.M. and Levin, H., Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21(3) (1972), pp. 384–388.
Mischel, W. and Shoda, Y., A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing the Invariances in Personality and the Role of Situations, Psychological Review 102(2) (1995), pp. 246–268.
Ross, L. and Nisbett, R., The Person and the Situation: perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1991.
Sayre-McCord, G., Hume and the Bauhaus Theory of Ethics, in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XX. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996, pp. 280–298.
Stocker, M., The Schizophrenia of Modern Moral Theories, Journal of Philosophy 73 (1976), pp. 453–466.
Williams, B.A.O., A Critique of Utilitarianism, in J.J.C. Smart and B.A.O. Williams (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Williams, B.A.O., Virtues and Vices, in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London; New York: Routledge, 1998.
Sayre-McCord, G., Hume and the Bauhaus Theory of Ethics, in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XX. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996, pp. 280–298.
Stocker, M., The Schizophrenia of Modern Moral Theories, Journal of Philosophy 73 (1976), pp. 453–466.
Williams, B.A.O., A Critique of Utilitarianism, in J.J.C. Smart and B.A.O. Williams (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Williams, B.A.O., Virtues and Vices, in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London; New York: Routledge, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merritt, M. Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3, 365–383 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009926720584
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009926720584