Abstract
The ability of clonal plants to transport substances between ramets located in different microsites also allows them to modify the plastic responses of individual ramets to local environmental conditions. By equalising concentrations of substances between ramets, physiological integration might decrease responses to local conditions. However, integration has also been observed to increase plasticity and induce novel plastic responses in ramets. To ask how integration modifies plant plasticity in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis, ramets were given either low light and high nitrogen or high light and low nitrogen, simulating a pattern of resource patchiness in their native habitat. Ramets in contrasting light/nitrogen treatments were either connected or single. Effects of light/nitrogen and connection were measured at three levels of morphological organisation, the organ, the ramet, and the clonal fragment. Connection between ramets reduced or had no effect on plastic responses in leaf size at the level of the plant organ. This suggested that integration dampened certain plastic responses. Connection induced a new plastic response at the level of the clonal fragment, an increase in allocation to vegetative reproduction in patches of low light and high nitrogen. It is concluded that clonal integration can have different effects on plant plasticity at different levels of plant organisation. It appears that, at least in this species, integration can increase plasticity at the level of the clonal fragment and concentrate vegetative reproduction in particular microsite types.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpert, P. 1991. Nitrogen-sharing among ramets increases clonal growth in Fragaria chiloensis. Ecology 72: 69–80.
Alpert, P. 1996. Nutrient sharing in natural clonal fragments of Fragaria chiloensis. J. Ecol. 84: 395–406.
Alpert, P. & Mooney, H. A. 1986. Resource sharing among ramets in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis. Oecologia 70: 227–233.
Alpert, P. & Mooney, H. A. 1996. Resource heterogeneity generated by shrubs and topography on coastal sand dunes. Vegetatio 122: 83–93.
Alpert, P. & Stuefer, J. F. 1997. Division of labour in clonal plants. Pp. 137–154. In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds), The ecology and physiology of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bradshaw, A. D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13: 115–155.
de Kroon, H. & Hutchings, M. J. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered. J. Ecol. 83: 143–152.
de Kroon, H. & Kalliola, R. 1995. Shoot dynamics of the giant grass Gynerium sagittatum in Peruvian Amazon floodplains, a clonal plant that does show self-thinning. Oecologia 101: 124–131.
Dong, M. 1995. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration. Oecologia 101: 282–288.
Evans, J. P. & Cain, M. L. 1995. A spatially explicit test of foraging behavior in a clonal plant. Ecology 76: 1147–1155.
Friedman, D. & Alpert, P. 1991. Reciprocal transport between ramets increases growth of Fragaria chiloensis when light and nitrogen occur in separate patches but only if patches are rich. Oecologia 86: 76–80.
Hickman, J. C. (ed.) 1993. The Jepson manual. Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Hutchings, M. J. 1997. Resource allocation patterns in clonal herbs and their consequences for growth. Pp. 161–189. In Bazzaz, F. A. & Grace, J. (eds), Plant resource allocation. Academic Press, New York.
Hutchings, M. J. & Bradbury, I. K. 1986. Ecological perspectives on clonal perennial herbs. BioScience 36: 178–182.
Hutchings, M. J. & Price, E. A. C. 1993. Does physiological integration enable clonal herbs to integrate the effects of environmental heterogeneity? Plant Spec. Biol. 8: 95–105.
Hutchings, M. J. & Wijesinghe, D. K. 1997. Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 390–394.
Marshall, C. 1990. Source-sink relations of interconnected ramets. Pp. 23–41. In: van Groenendael, J. & de Kroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants – regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Méthy, M., Alpert, P. & Roy, J. 1990. Effects of light quality and quantity on growth of the clonal plant Eichhornia crassipes. Oecologia 84: 265–271.
Sachs, T. & Hassidim, M. 1996. Mutual support and selection between branches of damaged plants. Vegetatio 127: 25–30.
Sachs, T. & Novoplansky, A. 1997. What does aclonal organization suggest concerning clonal plants? Pp. 55–77. In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds), The ecology and evolution of plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Scheiner, S. M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 24: 35–68.
Stuefer, J. F., de Kroon, H. & During, H. J. 1996. Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. Funct. Ecol. 10: 328–334.
Turkington, R., Hamilton, R. S. & Gliddon, C. 1991. Withinpopulation variation in localized and integrated responses of Trifolium repens to biotically patchy environments.Oecologia 86: 183–192.
Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston, Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alpert, P. Effects of clonal integration on plant plasticity in Fragaria chiloensis. Plant Ecology 141, 99–106 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009823015170
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009823015170