Skip to main content
Log in

Design Optimization of Multibody Systems by Sequential Approximation

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design optimization of multibody systems is usually established by a direct coupling of multibody system analysis and mathematical programming algorithms. However, a direct coupling is hindered by the transient and computationally complex behavior of many multibody systems. In structural optimization often approximation concepts are used instead to interface numerical analysis and optimization. This paper shows that such an approach is valuable for the optimization of multibody systems as well. A design optimization tool has been developed for multibody systems that generates a sequence of approximate optimization problems. The approach is illustrated by three examples: an impact absorber, a slider-crank mechanism, and a stress-constrained four-bar mechanism. Furthermore, the consequences for an accurate and efficient accompanying design sensitivity analysis are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabriele, G.A., 'Optimization in mechanisms', in Modern Kinematics: Developments in the Last Forty Years, A.G. Erdman (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993, Chapter 11, 471–519.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sohoni, V.N. and Haug, E.J., 'A state space technique for optimal design of mechanisms', ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 104, 1982, 792–798.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haug, E.J., Wehage, R.A. and Mani, N.K., 'Design sensitivity analysis of large-scale constrained dynamic mechanical systems', ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 106, 1984, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashrafiuon, H. and Mani, N.K., 'Analysis and optimal design of spatial mechanical systems', ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 112, 1990, 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bestle, D., Analyse und Optimierung von Mehrkörpersystemen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schiehlen, W., 'Multibody system dynamics: roots and perspectives', Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 149–188.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K. and Komkov, V., Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erdman, A.G., 'Computer-aided mechanism design: now and the future', ASME Special 50th Anniversary Design Issue 117(B), 1995, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barthelemy, J.-F.M. and Haftka, R.T., 'Approximation concepts for optimum structural design – A review', Structural Optimization 5, 1993, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haftka, R.T. and Gürdal, Z., Elements of Structural Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh, C.C. and Arora, J.S., 'Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response', Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 43, 1984, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bestle, D., 'Zur Optimierung von Mehrkörpersystemen', Institutsbericht IB-14, Institut B für Mechanik, University of Stuttgart, 1989.

  13. Grandhi, R.V., Haftka, R.T. and Watson, L.T., 'Design-oriented identification of critical times in transient response', AIAA Journal 24, 1986, 649–656.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vanderplaats, G.N., 'Thirty years of modern structural optimization', Advances in Engineering Software 16, 1993, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Etman, L.F.P., 'Optimization of multibody systems using approximation concepts', Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1997.

  16. NAG FORTRAN Library Manual, Mark 15, Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford, 1991.

  17. Sepulveda, A.E. and Schmit, L.A., 'Approximation-based global optimization strategy for structural synthesis', AIAA Journal 31, 1993, 180–188.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fleury, C. and Braibant, V., 'Structural optimization: A new dual method using mixed variables', International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 23, 1986, 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Svanberg, K., 'The method of moving asymptotes – A new method for structural optimization', International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 24, 1987, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Svanberg, K., 'A globally convergent version of MMA without linesearch', in WCMSO-1 First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, N. Olhoff and G.I.N. Rozvany (eds), Pergamon, Oxford, 1996, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bestle, D. and Eberhard, P., 'Analyzing and optimizing multibody systems', Mechanics of Structures and Machines 20, 1992, 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Afimawala, K.A. and Mayne, R.W., 'Optimum design of an impact absorber', ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 96, 1974, 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paradis, M.J. and Willmert, K.D., 'Optimal mechanism design using the Gauss constrained method', ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 105, 1983, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  24. {SAMCEF MECANO Manual, Version 5.1}, Samtech, Liège, 1994.

  25. Etman, L.F.P., van Campen, D.H. and Schoofs. A.J.G., 'Optimization of multibody systems using approximation concepts', in IUTAM Symposium on Optimization of Mechanical Systems, D. Bestle and W. Schiehlen (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Etman, L.F.P., Thijssen, E.J.R.W., Schoofs, A.J.G. and van Campen, D.H., 'Optimization of multibody systems using sequential linear programming', in ASME Advances in Design Automation, Vol. DE 69-2, B.J. Gilmore, D.A. Hoeltzel, D. Dutta and H.A. Eschenauer (eds), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1994, 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bischof, C.H., 'On the automatic differentiation of computer programs and an application to multibody systems', in IUTAM Symposium on Optimization of Mechanical Systems, D. Bestle and W. Schiehlen (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eberhard, P., Zur Mehrkriterienoptimierung von Mehrkörpersystemen, VDI Fortschritt-Berichte 11 (227), VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etman, L., van Campen, D. & Schoofs, A. Design Optimization of Multibody Systems by Sequential Approximation. Multibody System Dynamics 2, 393–415 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009780119839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009780119839

Navigation