Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of genes to reduce seed size in shape Arabidopsis and tobacco and their application to shape Citrus

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seedlessness is a highly desirable characteristic in fresh fruit. Marketability of a fruit as seedless does not require complete absence of seeds as long as the seed structures are imperceptible during consumption. Chimaeric genes comprised of soybean β-conglycinin seed storage protein gene promoters linked to the bacterial RNase gene, Barnase, were tested for their efficacy to cause seed death and decrease seed size in tobacco and Arabidopsis. These species were used because they undergo two distinct seed developmental pathways and produce albuminous and exalbuminous seeds, respectively. In both species, the death of embryo and endosperm tissues occurred, resulting in a dominant seed lethal phenotype with segregation distortion. Reduction in seed size was only observed in Arabidopsis seeds and the phenotype resembled that of stenospermocarpic seeds in grape. Some transformants of both species were male-sterile and this correlated with the expression of the gene in anthers indicating that expression of the gene is not strictly seed-specific. The promoters also direct expression of a linked GUS gene to Citrus embryos of various developmental stages, and Citrus forms exalbuminous seeds, therefore, the Barnase constructions may be useful in eliciting a reduction in seed size of around 75% of the seeds found in the fruit. This may be sufficient to warrant marketing as ‘less seedy’ if trials in the cultivar of interest indicate that the smaller seeds are less detectable to the consumer. Abbreviations: GUS, β-glucuronidase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DTA, diphtheria toxin-A chain; CFDA, 5(6)-carboxy-fluorescein di-acetate; CG, β-conglycinin; DAP, days after pollination; FAA, formaldehyde-acetic acid alcohol fixative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An G: Binary Ti vectors for plant transformation and promoter analysis. Meth Enzymol 153: 292–305 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avery GS Jr: Structure and germination of tobacco seed and the developmental anatomy of the seedling plant. Am J Bot 20: 309–327 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barker SJ: Developmental regulation of soybean (-conglycinin gene expression. Ph D thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, CA (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker SJ, Harada JJ, Goldberg RB: Cellular localization of soybean storage protein mRNA in transformed tobacco seeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 458–462 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Catsimpoolas N, Campbell TG, Meyer EW: Immunochemical study of changes in reserve proteins of germinating soybean seeds. Plant Physiol 43: 799–805 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czako M, Jang J-C, Herr JM Jr, Marton L: Differential manifestation of seed mortality induced by seed-specific expression of the gene for diphtheria toxin A chain in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Mol Gen Genet 235: 33–40 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denis MR, Delourme R, Gourret J-P, Mariani C, Renard M: Expression of engineered male sterility in Brassica napus. Plant Physiol 101: 1295–1304 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle JJ, Schuler MA, Godette WD, Zenger V, Beachy RN, Slightom JL: The glycosylated seed storage proteins of Glycine max and Phaseolus vulgaris. J Biol Chem 261: 9228–9238 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erdelska O: Dynamics of the development of embryo and endosperm I [Papaver somniferum, Nicotiana tabacum, Jasione montana]. Biologia (Bratislava) 40: 17–30 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erdelska O: Cytolysis of the endosperm in different types of correlation in endosperm and embryo development. Acta Bot Neerl 35: 437–441 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finer JJ, Vain P, Jones MW, McMullen MD: Development of the particle inflow gun for DNA delivery into plant cells. Plant Cell Rep 11: 323–328 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gillaspy G, Ben-David H, Gruissem W: Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5: 1439–1451 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg RB, Hoschek G, Tam SH, Ditta GS, Breidenbach RW: Abundance, diversity and regulation of mRNA sequence sets in soybean embryogenesis. Devel Biol 83: 201–217 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldman MHS, Goldberg RB, Mariani C: Female sterile tobacco plants are produced by stigma-specific cell ablation. EMBO J 13: 2976–2984 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harada JJ, Barker SJ, Goldberg RB: Soybean β-conglycinin genes are clustered in several DNA regions and are regulated by transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes. Plant Cell 1: 415–425 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hartley RW: Barnase and barstar. Expression of its cloned inhibitor permits expression of a cloned ribonuclease. J Mol Biol 202: 913–915 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hidaka T, Omura M: Control of embryogenesis in Citrus cell culture: regeneration from protoplasts and attempts to callus bank. Bull Fruit Tree Res Stn B16: 1–17 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hidaka T, Omura M, Ugaki M, Tomiyama M, Kato A, Ohshima M, Motoyoshi F: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of Citrus spp. from suspension cells. Jpn J Breed 40: 199–207 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins TJV, Newbigin EJ, Spencer D, Llewellyn DJ, Craig S: The sequence of a pea vicilin gene and its expression in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 11: 683–695 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirai MY, Fujiwara T, Goto K, Komeda Y, Chino M, Naito S: Differential regulation of soybean seed storage protein gene promoter-GUS fusions by exogenously applied methionine in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 35: 927–934 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffman NL, Eicholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT: A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227: 1229–1231 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW: GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase is a sensitive and versatile fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6: 3901–3907 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jofuku KD, den Boer BGW, Van Montagu M, Okamuro JK: Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene apetela-2. Plant Cell 6: 1211–1225 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kandasamy MK, Thorsness MK, Rundle SJ, Goldberg ML, Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME: Ablation of papillar cell function in Brassica flowers results in the loss of stigma receptivity to pollination. Plant Cell 5: 263–275 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim Y, An G: Pollen-specific expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana α 1-tubulin promoter assayed by β-glucuronidase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase and diphtheria toxin reporter genes. Transgen Res 1: 188–194 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klein TM, Gradziel T, Fromm ME, Sanford JC: Factors influencing gene delivery into Zea mays cells by high velocity microprojectiles. Bio/technology 6: 559–563 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koltunow AM: Isolation and construction of genes to control seed production in Citrus. In: Hayashi T, Omura M, Scott NS (eds) Techniques on Gene Diagnosis and Breeding in Fruit Trees, pp. 101–108. Fruit Tree Research Station, Tsukuba, Japan (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koltunow AM, Brennan P: Paternal transmission of a seed size reduction gene varies with age of a primary transformant and seed set is also influenced by gene expression in maternal tissues. Mol Breed 4: 253–261 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koltunow AM, Truettner J, Cox KH, Wallroth M, Goldberg RB: Different temporal and spatial gene expression patterns occur during anther development. Plant Cell 2: 1201–1224 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koltunow AM, Soltys K, Nito N, Mc Clure S: Anther, ovule, seed and nucellar embryo development in Citrus sinensis cv. Valencia. Can J Bot 73: 1567–1582 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koltunow AM, Hidaka T, Robinson SP: Polyembryony in Citrus: accumulation of seed storage proteins in seeds and embryos cultured in vitro. Plant Physiol 110: 599–609 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM: A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4: 403–410 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koning, A, Jones A, Fillatti J, Comai L, Lassner MW: Arrest of embryo development in Brassica napus mediated by modified Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Plant Mol Biol 18: 247–258 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ledbetter CA, Ramming DW: Seedlessness in grapes. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural Reviews, pp. 159–184. Timber Press, Portland Oregon (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee TD: Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: Doust JL, Doust LL (eds) Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies, pp. 179–202. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leon-Kloosterziel KM, Keijzer CJ, Koornneef MA: A seed shape mutant of Arabidopsis that is affected in integument development. Plant Cell 6: 385–392 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Luckwill LC: Fruit growth in relation to external and internal chemical stimuli. In: Rudnick D (ed) Cell, Organism and Milieu, pp. 223–251. Ronald Press, New York (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mariani C, De Beuckeleer M, Truettner J, Leemans J, Goldberg R.B: Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347: 737–741 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mariani C, Gossele V, De Beuckeleer M, De Block M, Goldberg RB, De Greef W, Leemans J: A chimaeric ribonuclease-inhibitor gene restores fertility to male sterile plants. Nature 357: 384–387 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Meinke DW, Sussex IM: Embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. A model system for genetic analysis of plant embryo development. Devel Biol 72: 50–61 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moore GA, Jacono CC, Neidigh JL, Lawrence SD, Cline K: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of stem segments and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 11: 238–242 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  43. O'Brien TP, McCully ME: The study of plant structure. Principles and selected methods. Termacarphi Press, Australia (1981).

  44. Pearson HM: Parthenocarpy and seed abortion in Vitis vinifera. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 29: 169–175 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pena L, Cervera M, Juarez J, Navarro A, Pina JA, Duran-Vila N, Navarro L: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sweet orange and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 14: 616–619 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Quiggin D: Transcriptional regulation of a pea vicilin gene. Ph D thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reynaerts A, Van de Wiele H, De Sutter G, Janssens J: Engineered genes for fertility control and their application in hybrid seed production. Sci Hort 55: 125–139 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Roth I: Fruits of angiosperms. Borntraeger, Berlin (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sano M, Kawashima N: Isolation and partial characterization of the major seed protein from Nicotiana tabacum and accumulation during development. Agric Biol Chem 47: 1305–1310 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schuler MA, Schmitt ES, Beachy RN: Closely related families of genes code for the α and α′ subunits of the soybean 7S storage protein complex. Nucl Acids Res 10: 8225–8244 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Spurr AP: A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26: 31–43 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stout AB: Seedlessness in grapes. New York State Agric Exp Stn (Geneva) Tech Bul 238 (1936).

  53. Sykes SR, Possingham JV: The effect of excluding insect pollinators on seediness of Imperial mandarin fruits. Aust J Exp Agric 32: 409–411 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sykes SR, Koltunow AM, Lee LS: The genetic improvement of mandarins in Australia. Aust Citrus News 70: 8–12 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thanh VH, Shibasaki K: Heterogeneity of β-conglycinin. Biochim Biophys Acta 439: 326–338 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thorsness MK, Kandasamy MK, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB: Genetic ablation of floral cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5: 253–261 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Valvekens D, Van Montagu M, Lijsebettens M: Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 5536–5540 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  58. van der Geest AHM, Frisch DA, Kemp JD, Hall TC: Cell ablation reveals that expression from the phaseolin promoter is confined to embryogenesis and microsporogenesis. Plant Physiol 109: 1151–1158 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Weber H, Borisjuk L, Wobus U: Sugar import and metabolism during seed development. Trends Plant Sci 2: 169–174 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Weinberger JH, Harmon FN: Seedlessness in vinifera grapes. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 85: 270–274 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koltunow, A.M., Brennan, P., Bond, J.E. et al. Evaluation of genes to reduce seed size in shape Arabidopsis and tobacco and their application to shape Citrus. Molecular Breeding 4, 235–251 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009610819338

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009610819338

Navigation