Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study evaluates indicators in Swedish spruce forests. We ask whether different species groups co-vary in their occurrence and to what extent species richness and composition is predictable from habitat structures. We studied 10 boreal spruce forest stands constituting a gradient in degree of selective logging. Occurrences of vascular plants, bryophytes, epiphytic lichens and wood-inhabiting fungi as well as habitat structures was inventoried. In addition, in five of the stands, beetles were sampled with windows traps. Total species richness was correlated with several habitat factors, mainly particular substrates and degree of forestry impact. However, the richness of a set of species regularly used as indicators did not correlate with habitat factors. Correlation in species richness among different organism groups were few and scale dependent. Only lichens and vascular plants formed nested subset patterns (i.e. species composition at poorer sites is subsets of the species present at richer sites) among the study sites. The study shows that in this forest type one cannot a priori assume that richness in one group of species correlated with richness in other, and measures of single habitat features may be relevant only to particular groups of species. Instead, monitoring and inventories should be based on a set of factors reflecting important aspects for different groups of organisms and if indicator species are to be used these should be chosen from several species groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L and Jalas J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 169–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P (1997) Towards a logic for assessing biodiversity in boreal forest. In: Bachmann P, Köhl M and Päivinen R (eds) Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1994) Skogsvårdslagen, Handbok. Swedish Forestry Board, Jönköping

  • Aronsson M, Hallingbäck T and Mattsson L-E (1995) Rödlistade växter i Sverige 1995. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader P, Jansson S and Jonsson BG (1995) Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol. Conserv. 72: 355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å, Ehnström B, Gustavsson L, Hallingbäck T, Jonsell M and Weslien J (1994) Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å, Ehnström B, Gustavsson L, Hallingbäck T, Jonsell M and Weslien J (1995) Threat levels and threats to red-listed species in Swedish forests. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1629–1633

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernes C (ed) (1994) Biodiversity in Sweden. Monitor 14. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Solna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A (1991) Nested faunas and extinction in fragmented habitats. Conserv. Biol. 4: 496–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling F (1978) Nordsvenska skogstyper. Sveriges Skogsvårdsf. Tidsk. 4: 340–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehnström B, Gärdenfors U and Lindelöw Å (1993) Rödlistade evertebrater i Sverige 1993. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson et al. (1973–1987) The Corticiaceae of North Europe. Fungiflora, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries C, Johansson O, Pettersson B and Simonsson P (1997) Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 94: 89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53: 7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen V (1964) Fortegnelse over Danmarks biller 1. og 2. del. Entomologiske Meddelelser 33: 1–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding PT and Rose F (1986) Pasture-woodlands in lowland Britain. NERC Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF and van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R (1995) Nested species subsets and geographic isolation: a case study. Ecology 76: 458–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson T (1998) The vascular plants of Sweden – a checklist. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 91: 241–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohm KA and Franklin JF (1996) Creating a Forestry for the Twenty-First Century. Island Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruys N and Jonsson BG (1997) Insular patterns of calicioid lichens in a boreal old-growth forest-wetland mosaic. Ecography 20: 605–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Lämås T and Fries C (1995) Emergence of a biodiversity concept in Swedish forestry policy. Water, Air, nd Soil Pollution 82: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Landres PB, Verner J and Thomas JW (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv. Biol. 2: 316–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (1996) Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: selective immigrations or extinctions? J. Biogeog. 23: 699–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg S and Gustavsson B (1995) Catalogus Coleopterorum Sueciae. Naturhistoriska riskmuseet, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B and Mefford MJ (1995) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 2.0. MjMSoftware Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol. Rev. 73: 181–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson SG, Arup U, Baranowski R and Ekman S (1995) Tree-dependent lichens and beetles as indicators in conservation forests. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1208–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson SG and Baranowski R (1997) Habitat predictability and the occurrence of wood beetles in oldgrowth beech forests. Ecography 20: 491–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitare J and Norén M (1992) Nyckelbiotoper kartläggs i nytt projekt vid Skogsstyrelsen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Noren M, Hultgren B, Nitare J and Bergengren I (1995) Datainsamling vid inventering av nyckelbiotoper. Skogstyrelsen, Jönköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4: 355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland B, Bakke A, Hågvar S and Kvamme T (1996) What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 75–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm T (1951) Die Holz und Rindenkäfer der nordschwedische Laubbäume. Meddelanden från statens skogsforskningsinstitut 40: 1–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm T (1959) Die Holz und Rindenkäfer der Süd-und Mittelschwedischen Laubbäume. Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 16: 1–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD and Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. In: Heaney LR and Patterson BD (eds) Island Biogeography of Mammals, pp 65–82.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28 Academic Press and Linnean Society of London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD (1987) The principle of nested subsets and its implication for biological conservation. Conserv. Biol. 1: 323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD (1990) On the temporal development of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oikos 59: 330–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC and Gibbons DW (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose F (1992) Temperate forest management: its effects on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In: Bates JW and Farmer AM (eds) Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, pp 211–233. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryvarden L and Gilbertson RL (1993–1994) European Polypores, Part 1. Fungiflora, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Santesson R (1993) The Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi of Sweden and Norway. SBT-förlaget, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J and Martikainen P (1994) Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula: A comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 185–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1979) Rarefaction as a distribution-free method of expressing and estimating diversity. In: Grassle JF, Patil GP, Smith W and Taillie C (eds) Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, pp 159–176. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passe in the landscape era? Biol. Conserv. 83: 247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström L (1988) The occurrence of epixylic bryophytes and lichen species in an old natural and a managed forest stand in northeast Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 45: 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström L and Hedenäs L (1998) Checklista över Sveriges mossor – 1998. Myrinia 8: 58–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation. Council of Europe, Strasbourg ter

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak CJF and Prentice IC (1987) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271–317

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jonsson, B.G., Jonsell, M. Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1417–1433 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008900309571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008900309571

Navigation