Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Analysis of U.S. and World Oil Production Patterns Using Hubbert-Style Curves

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quantitative analytical method, using a spreadsheet, has been developed that allows the determination of values of the three parameters that characterize the Hubbert-style Gaussian error curve that best fits the conventional oil production data both for the U.S. and the world. The three parameters are the total area under the Gaussian, which represents the estimated ultimate (oil) recovery (EUR), the date of the maximum of the curve, and the half-width of the curve. The “best fit” is determined by adjusting the values of the three parameters to minimize the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the data and the Gaussian. The sensitivity of the fit to changes in values of the parameters is indicated by an exploration of the rate at which the RMSD increases as values of the three parameters are varied from the values that give the best fit. The results of the analysis are as follows: (1) the size of the U.S. EUR of oil is suggested to be 0.222 × 1012 barrels (0.222 trillion bbl) of which approximately three-fourths appears to have been produced through 1995; (2) if the world EUR is 2.0 × 1012 bbl (2.0 trillion bbl), a little less than half of this oil has been produced through 1995, and the maximum of world oil production is indicated to be in 2004; (3) each increase of one billion barrels in the size of the world EUR beyond the value of 2.0 × 1012 bbl can be expected to result in a delay of approximately 5.5 days in the date of maximum production; (4) alternate production scenarios are presented for world EURs of 3.0 and 4.0 × 1012 bbl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adelman, M. A., and Lynch, M. C., 1997, Fixed view of resource limit creates undue pessimism: Oil & Gas Journal, v. 95, no. 14, p. 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. A., 1978, Forgotten fundamentals of the energy crisis: Am. Jour. of Phys., v. 46, p. 876–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. A., 1997-98, Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment— revisited: Renewable Resources Jour., v. 15, no. 4, Winter 1997–1998, p. 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. J., and Laherrere, J. H., 1998, The end of cheap oil: Scientific American, v. 278, no. 3, p. 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. D., 1997, Crude oil and alternate energy production forecasts for the twenty-first century: The end of the hydrocarbon era: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Bull., v. 81, no. 8, p. 1292–1305. [Much of this work was available earlier in a report from the Energy and Minerals Applied Research Center (EMARC) (1996), Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0250.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert, M. K., 1974, U.S. energy resources, a review as of 1972; A background paper prepared at the request of Henry M. Jackson, Chairman, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, United States Senate, Pursuant to Senate Resolution 45, A National Fuels and Energy Policy Study: Serial No. 93-40 (92-75), Part 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1974, p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert, M. K., 1982, Oil and gas supply modeling: NBS special publication 631, U.S. Department of Commerce/National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute of Standards andTechnology, NIST) May 1982, p. 90.

  • Ivanhoe, L. F., 1995, Future world oil supplies: There is a finite limit: World Oil, v. 216, no. 10, p. 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, L. F., 1997, King Hubbert—updated: Hubbert Center Newsletter, No. 97/1 Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, J. J., 1996, Oil as a finite resource: When is global production likely to peak? World Resources Institute, 1709 New York Ave., NW, Washington, DC, 20006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, C. D., Root, D. H., and Attanasi, E. D., 1994, World petroleum assessment and analysis: Proceedings of the 14th World Petroleum Congress: John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 529–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration, 1995, Annual Energy Review, DOE/EIA(95). (The U.S. production data are from the column “Crude Oil” of Table 5.1, p. 141; The world production data are from the column “ World” of Table 11.5, p. 297.)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, 80309-0390

    Albert A. Bartlett

Authors
  1. Albert A. Bartlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartlett, A.A. An Analysis of U.S. and World Oil Production Patterns Using Hubbert-Style Curves. Mathematical Geology 32, 1–17 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007587132700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007587132700

Search

Navigation