Skip to main content
Log in

Plant regeneration from embryogenic cultures of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud.

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embryogenic cultures of the common reed [Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex. Steud.] were induced on Murashige and Skoog (1962)-based medium with 2% (w/v) sucrose, B5 vitamins and 4.5 μM 2,4-dichlorphenoxyacetic acid. Four independent culture lines, two initiated from stem nodes and two from roots, were established. These cultures underwent somatic embryogenesis. In one line of stem node origin, the somatic embryos germinated and developed into plants, following transfer of embryogenic cultures to Murashige and Skoog (1962)-based medium lacking growth regulators, with 108 ± 17 plants being recovered per 100 mg fresh weight of culture. In other lines, the somatic embryos developed roots, but not shoots. Shoot regeneration via somatic embryogenesis offers potential as anin vitro system for physiological studies, including assessments of the response of common reed to environmental pollutants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong J, Armstrong W & van der Putten WH (1996) Phragmites die-back: bud and root death, blockages within the aeration and vascular systems and the possible role of phytotoxins. New Phytol. 133: 399–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emons AMC & Kieft H (1991) Histological comparison of single somatic embryos of maize from suspension culture with somatic embryos attached to callus cells. Plant Cell Rep. 10: 485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKee J & Richards AJ (1996) Variation in seed production and germinability in common reed (Phragmites australis) in Britain and France with respect to climate. New Phytol. 133: 233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch JP & Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163: 85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF & Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan RS & Gorenflot R (1975) In vitro culture of Phragmites tissues. Callus formation, organ differentiation and cell suspension culture. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 75S: 256–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub PF, Decker DM & Gallagher JL (1988) Tissue culture and long-term regeneration of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex. Steud. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 15: 73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye ZH, Wong MH, Baker JM & Willis AJ (1998) Comparison of biomass and metal uptake between two populations of Phragmites australis grown in flooded and dry conditions. Ann. Bot. 82: 83–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Davey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Máthé, C., Hamvas, M.M., Grigorszky, I. et al. Plant regeneration from embryogenic cultures of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud.. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 63, 81–84 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006471515103

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006471515103

Navigation