Abstract
This paper presents an interpretation of Husserl's phenomenological epoché or bracketing ( Einklammerung), which makes it possible to compare his position with philosophical programs developed within the framework of modern analytical philosophy. At the same time it asks in what sense Husserl's phenomenology is a form of idealism or exceeds the traditional discussion of idealism versus realism.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Husserl, Edmund: 1950ff, Husserliana (Gesammelte Werke), Haag.
Husserl, Edmund: 1982[1970], Logical Investigations, J. N. Findlay (trans.), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Henley, U.K.; Humanities Press, NJ, U.S.A.
Husserl, Edmund: 1962[1931], Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, R. Boyce Gibson (trans.), Macmillans, London.
Husserl, Edmund: 1960, Cartesian Meditations, D. Cairns (trans.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Netherlands
Husserl, Edmund: 1970, The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, David Carr (trans.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lübcke, P. A Semantic Interpretation of Husserl's EpochÉ. Synthese 118, 1–12 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005101213436
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005101213436